Lynx

Are you going to actually build it, or use a tool to build it for you? Good luck either way.

Just let DSB die so that it can start up again under new management already? Seems a lot harder than dealing with an obvious problem.

Cheers, that second article is brilliant. I was previously using the Inet data type in my schemas however I was just having a hard time actually storing it as the scaffold didn't inherently know how to display it properly - but I think I have it down now. Thanks again. =)

OKay, so I know a few good Java coders/programmers regularly read the forums here, so I have a quick question. This is more of a "What's the best way of doing this" question... I have a network address (192.168.192.0/24 for example) that I need to use to derive a subnet mask from, and also derive all possible valid IP addresses from (as they need to be allocated/relinquished properly). I can work out the netmasks easy enough, however the allocation of valid IP addresses is confusing me a little. The application I'm writing is Groovy/Grails (I have no choice, it's what my client uses on his servers). I've started by creating a domain class which asks the user for each octet, and then a controller which simply scaffolds the domain. Here's an example: package ipna3 class Network { int octet1 int octet2 int octet3 int octet4 int cidrNotation static constraints = { octet1(blank: false, range: 0..255) octet2(blank: false, range: 0..255) octet3(blank: false, range: 0..255) octet4(blank: false, range: 0..255) cidrNotation(blank: false, range: 0..32) } static mapping = { table 'networks' octet1 column: 'octal_1' octet2 column: 'octal_2' octet3 column: 'octal_3' octet4 column: 'octal_4' cidrNotation column: 'cidr_notation' } } The subnet masks I can calculate easy enough (I'm storing them in another table) however I am having trouble figuring out the best way to ensure that I am allocating valid IP addresses to service users. The client has over 10mln addresses once all blocks are expanded so I can't just pool them all into a table and just check that the address specified doesn't belong to user 'unallocated' as queries take forever... So the method I am thinking of doing is to firstly check if the address is valid, then disallow duplicate values. There's one thing that's miffing me a little, though - what is the best way (algorithmically) to check if an address is valid? I've checked the Java.net packages and I can't seem to find a way in there - and nobody else seems to have done it (unless I'm failing at Google) so how would any of you guys do it? Thanks in advance

Which is likely why they're in the mess that they're in now.

For those that do need asss hosting, feel free to contact me.

What security concerns are there?

Have her contact me, and yes I'll host any good zone free of charge.

I'll be hosting indefinitely, and I'm willing to host any zone without question provided they're run professionally and don't break any common sense rules. Also, as a reminder as the server will have to reboot on the weekend, I'll restart the zones myself however as I don't keep a track of what bots you're running please check that your zone is running stable.

Lol typo - backup your stuff**

Hi, I'll be upgrading the server over the weekend, I have backed up all of your files (however it's better if you also backup your stuff) - I am warning you guys just as a precaution. Cheers

serious?

Nice, I'll seed these from a few computers and my server.

I actually miss Omega Fire a little.

L.C. every time you make one of these threads I die a little.

Afaik, you can't do android development in msvs2010 anyway. I was tinkering around last night in eclipse and got a connection using Brains code, the GUIs on android are XML managed - I'll tinker around and see if I can get something half decent done during idle time...

It's easy to code, but who has the time? Brain and d1st0rt have stated their requirements to code it.

Android can't run .jar files unfortunately.

I use Linode, and I can vouch that they're excellent. Everspace also uses Linode.

I'm considering one of these Android tablets if they can prove themselves.

ASSS doesn't run too great on Windows x64, so I ran it inside a VMWare XP session, and I got to a limit of ~492 bots. Once this limit was reached, the following occurred: I <arenaman> {0} [bot532] entering arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot533] entering arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot534] entering arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot535] entering arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot536] entering arena I <net> [bot532] [pid=459] player kicked for too many outgoing packets I <net> [bot533] [pid=460] player kicked for too many outgoing packets I <net> [bot534] [pid=461] player kicked for too many outgoing packets I <net> [bot535] [pid=516] player kicked for too many outgoing packets I <net> [bot536] [pid=563] player kicked for too many outgoing packets I <arenaman> {0} [bot532] leaving arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot533] leaving arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot534] leaving arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot535] leaving arena I <arenaman> {0} [bot536] leaving arena I also tried running the bots from the host OS into the VMWare session, but got the same error. I'll load ASSS in a linux distro later, and see if the same occurs. L.C., have you tried changing Net:MaxOutlistSize?

Good luck charging an Australian for treason in America. Going by your logic, Aileron, they'd also have to charge every news outlet for the same crimes (and those charged would face the same punishments).

Android has an emulator, you'll be able to use that for testing without any real problems.

I've heard Android is based on Java, or is at least very similar to Java - it'd probably be very easy to do.

I'm curious, why is the 'latency handling' on asss no good?