Sketter

Depends. There are a lot of stuff happing in the background it's hard to tell. But what ever happens will set the tone for the rest of the country.

Love U!

Clearly a bad joke gone wrong. she isn't a man.

Should be fairly easy to make a ready-to-play ASSS setup, if it's not done already... With most standard modules included by default. 90% of the time when someone has a problem with his ASSS zone, it's because he forgot to include a module, even if it's pretty standard (flags, directory server, ...) Last i heard from Snrrrub is that As3 needs a lot of work still. And for shanky.com/server would be nice to have a "how-to-Asss" like it does with subgame. Some my find my next point useless, but the command lines have changed quite a bit, that the use of a bot is useless in a As3 zone. Yes as3 can do everything a bot can do and more, but not everyone can code. There are many zones that relied on preexisting bots and plugins for their zone. Now their even limited and will have to find a coder to implant any idea then looking for a pluing for a bot that may already exist, and that as we all know it is even more scares. As for the topic. You need a new client. You can only go as far as a game will let you. It isn't even just about bug fixes and making setting work better. With being able to update the game you can perhaps allow new features into the game to create different type of game playing other then turf, flagging, and balling. I would prefer Snrrrub's client, (since he stepped back into the picture and i trust him on a personal level) however any client that is adequate, and kept up to date is a go.

I agree with Chambahs there. I think the process of sharing areas will need to be well thought out and redesigned to fulfill your purpose. However, to even then work on that area would need a very strong union of zones. As what is seen with what happened to SSC forums, we are polite at best, but hardly united. It's not a bad idea, but our community isn't there yet.

That's exactly what i was thinking. Didn't they go bankrupt already? What's keeping them alive?

belated

Get 48 inch (or greater) LCD or plasma TV, and good 5.1 or 7.1 or 8.1 sound. Go out and buy snack food for the movie. And it's not stealing, it's sharing. Invite friends over. And if you can't get friends to come over then go outside and talk to some people, about the movie you watched, (trust me, if you can't get friends to come over to watch a movie you might as well make new friends) cause really, there is no differences. You now have successfully socialized, and supported local economy for purchase of foods and goods from local stores that DO need your money, that is not highly overpriced. The only movies worth going to the theaters are those that do 3D IMAX.. until you can start viewing that at home. Edit: I forget to also mention the added benefits is that you can "Pause and Rewind" ...something you can't do in those moments when you couldn't make out what the actors said. Take that Paramount! /fix

IC, however i think an overview and a full description of tiles would be better. Still good work tho.

"Explain what DCME is" and "Explain Unique tiles" have the same link to video.

Seems to be fixed. TY

What? People still use IE? ... why? It's like dead technology. It's only good for updating windows, if auto update is giving you problems.

If they keep that at $50 it will drive more ppl to the black market. Since (if) it is legal more will be willing to smoke weed, meaning more users, and frequent users, and the need to look for a deal. To actually make this work they need to bring that number way down. But again, this is just a bill, it isn't law, and I'm sure there will be a lot of people who are going to fight this, just like gay marriages.

Relax kids, this is still just a bill.

Those that you have underlined, can you please link them to your src?

He was 12 at the time he had sex. Wow. I don't' know why but i find this rather funny. He has zero clue what exactly is going on. The general perception is that the caretakers will likely be the grand parents, and making the impact of what they done less then if any of us (people with age of consent) had a child. What i took note is their family seemed to be quite large as is. And with the shot of sex ed in that article, wounder if it is in fact that sex ed failed, or other roles played a key part. But it seems Sex ed is getting criticized a lot. Age is very important when i look at stuff like this. 12-14 or 12-15 (it doesn't say how old she was at the time) may only look 2 or 3 years part, but your brain is still being developed, it does mean a lot. And not to say he isn't at fault, but this story puts a lot of focus on him (and i guess that's easy he looks but it never put the spot light on her. (it did but hardly) While she equally responsible to for having sex, she should have more maturity then a 12 year old. She in fact can be charged with statutory rape. Well... not sure if that applies in Britain.

This is a good read. One states what "should" in theory, and the other states what "is" in practice. And then some in between stuff. In respects to the illegal immigrants, i would like to know what each party's solution(s) are.

I have never thought about it like that, it's actually a scary thought, and easily controlled by the government. Hhm, makes me think of China now.

I tried to open a map over a network and i get infinite crash with "Critical error (Bad file name or number) in MDIForm_Load" and as for infinite, it closes and restarts after i hit ok on the error box. I need to win task it close.

Since some1 opened something about the wii, has anyone thought about opening this up for wiibrew? http://wiibrew.org/wiki/Main_Page It might actually be an incentive for population since it's getting a lot of attention.

It is not ideal to have those that commit crime to answer for it? What are the odds that Bush will even get punished if anything is found? Well you need to start somewhere. Obama is the message of "yes we can" and "change" how much he can do time will tell. But he is off to a good start. So is it alright to turn a blind eye when something seems fishing and deceiving? Oh he's the president, we can't investigate him.... why? In my opinion presidents should not be immune. If they are then you just opening up to a lot of abuse. And that has happened over the years. People got to take away this silly notion that the president is above all. He works for the people of the country. Isn't that your the democratic way? Isn't that why you put him up there? Then shouldn't he answer for the people he works for? If you take away the immunity then you can start to take away the abuse. By not looking into it then are you allowing it. It's like watching a murder happen and you walked away and said nothing, then the murderer goes free cause no one can testify. Better yet, lets take your approach and not even have an investigation because that is the message your sending. You can't say that you don't think there shouldn't BE an investigation, but then at the same time then say lets look at more important issues. You sympathize cause you felt you should, but lets not take care of the problem, lets look over here. Yes there is big problems, but doesn't everyone? When isn't there one? When would be the most convenient for you.. and your mother, and your dad, and, the lady next door, the guy down the street, the post office man, the school teacher, and the rest of everyone else. When do you think it's convenient? Either you take care of it, or don't. But don't' throw excuses. If Hillary gets her balls busted then so be it. And if they are that worried, but concerned for the future of America, then perhaps they should pass it so that only future presidents can be prosecuted.

So? Stick to your guns? As much as i am interesting in the history lesson of W/D and the forums as a hole, it is actually e-relevant. Using your logic, it is still out of place, and knowing what as done to gaming, should apply to it as well. (Not that i expect anything will happy, but how you justified it with a history lesson didn't do the trick) Yes i have noticed what you have done to dev section, however, they still exist in a parent form. Gaming was simply wiped. So other then cleaning/organizing the forums, i don't know what you really meant by it, other then leaving a big gap for what I am about to say next.... (btw, i think what you did with dev was a great idea, it does look much neater) Well one could suggest that you combine it into the World Discussions and do what you did to dev and create a it under a parent. And perhaps a change in the title to let others know what is i there. No matter how you say it, it looked like you were trying to hide it by placing at the bottom. (I like to see the good in people) Perhaps you really did mean well with where you placed it, but it was truly an epic failure move. I see your point. And it's valid, but again, if i don't know where to post it (probably because i didn't bother looking at the very bottom of the abyss(hehe Hakaku)) then it will be shot into general. Well I for one didn't know this came back a 4th time. Perhaps it should have died a while back and stay dead, but you brought it back. It seems Swift stuck to his guns. And you still can't ignore the fact of where you placed it didn't contribute to the problem. You can't in a fair way said you give it the opportunity. Life is full of perceptions especially when actions are done before reasoning is explained. In fact, you might have left more questions then answers. I'm not really sure if people are looking for you to bring the forums back, (maybe some are) but i think some are looking for you to take responsibility on how badly this ended. Sketter Oh... Happy Hanukkah!!

If you were THAT strongly apposed to it, you should have just stuck to your guns. He is only one man, how many of there are you? Sketter And a happy new year! you know whats funny... you bashed yourself.... No i was reinstating what i was saying. Perhaps there was a better way of doing it... maybe if i put the quote last i guess...or....how does it look now?

I really have nothing against anyone on these forums. So what ever tone is going to be token from my post is up to them. You're points cream is meh, kinda weak. The forums have worst issues then a gaming section. And with the game in the state how it is, you're better off starting to convert the forums to appeal other aspects. (Or so polix was led us to believe) Also, you now have topics of games being discussed in general. Unless you make a new rule, instead of having your visitors ignore any game topic that might persuade them to leave continuum, then now have to skim threads of it in general. Which do you think is more in your face of persuasion? And i know this is something you just made up. Cause if talking about other games was a problem, A-No section would have been made, B-There would be a rule. C-Certainly there wouldn't be a single topic in general about another game. But that isn't even my issue. My only input is if chambs wanted a section, is it to much to ask for one? The debate of it's usefulness is another topic, and something i did not comment on. My only problem is how the issue was resolved. If you put World Discussion at the bottom of the forum i bet you wouldn't notice much movement in there as well. The most important stuff goes on top and then down the line in priority. That's how things work. Having chamb's section at the bottom, come on. You can't even make agreement to support that. Even lynx said he didn't know it was there. Yes he said he wouldn't have visited it, but he still didn't notice it, so it is not Lynx was even given the change to say no. Sounds like you in a settle way, made that choice for him, and perhaps, many others. I believe (not that it matters to anyone) the intentions where set to fail. As I said... If you were THAT strongly apposed to it, you should have just stuck to your guns. He is only one man, how many of there are you? Sketter And a happy new year!

I suggest being consistent and apply the same attention/action to World Discussion. Yes good job on not taking sides Polix - What i question here is did you even try to give it a fair chance? Or just had your judgments dictating the course of action.? It honestly looked like you took some political twist where you added it, but in a way where it would be set up to fail. You're entitled to do what you want, but you gave false hope. It was pointless and mean (perhaps insulting) to even entertain chamb in the first place, if all you were trying to do is create epic failure to rub in his face in silence. Sketter Happy Holidays!!