Lynx

Yeah, and seeing as this forum is pretty dead...

Me neither.

Have you read the thread?

Ahh, rub on rub off?

How can you screw up a map? It's not like it's the first time they've done it either. Fox = retarded.

4chan

There's a word for people who believe that they are their own God, and it has a nice broad description to fit you into a sect that probably in fact makes you religious. I just can't be arsed to research it to find out what that word is. -L

Depends on what parsing the sysadmins have allowed. -L

I've only skim-read this thread. I'll map for you if you give me an idea of what you'd like (i.e. I'll cover anything you need - borders, base style, goals etc) however I don't really have the time for monotonous tile-sets. Message me if you're in need of assistance.

Whatever floats your boat, I guess.

Your definite lining is incorrect. Not all atheists disprove God through Science, but question God through what they perceive as either believable, logical or pragmatic. Furthermore, not all atheists are there to disprove God, depending on explicit or implicitness can just not believe in God, and therefore be atheist. I find that atheists use Science as further ground to discredit religion (i.e. point out the stupid loopholes, mistakes etc. that should not have been there, being the 'word of God' and all), but Science used as a vessel to disprove God is completely pointless. It's impossible to disprove something which is 100% based through faith (imaginary) with Science, as Science requires proof, empirical evidence and so on... It's easy to disprove some retard who thinks he's Jesus - but that is not disproving God - that's disproving a delusional moron. Now, as I said - you have explicit and implicit atheists. Those who are extremely explicit, can easily believe without a shadow of doubt that there is no God, and therefore be atheist. They'd most likely be a moron, but it's still possible. Just like it's possible for a Christian to believe without a shadow of doubt that there *is a God. Like I said, they'd have to be a moron, but it happens. -L

If they're changing your price, you have every right to terminate any contract that you have with them. -L

---- And to me not understanding what being religious means: I think that we've covered that. Read a book on Linguistics, you'll understand that definitions aren't the primary answer to any question. I know that I have faith in many different things, however that faith doesn't make me part of any group, or belief structure. It simply means that I accept a broad range of things to possibly be true, but with a questionable doubt. As you can tell from the above quote, I do not believe that there is no God - however, I have more faith that Science is correct, and that God is just something for those who need that comfort, or have lost a loved one or something. The only reason I think that God could possibly ever exist, is because what we have is so advanced and that there are currently *THAT many unanswered, or impossible to answer questions laying around. When I was a naive child, I had a stronger belief in God, because I understood less about the world - however, now I understand more and therefore, have less faith in God. The very fact that I fight that there is no God? I'm searching? I'm asking 'What If?' - I'll soon be 'free'? Firstly, it's healthy to scrutinise what's infront of you. If you didn't you'd be left with a bum deal all of the time, and the world wouldn't progress. I'm asking 'What If?' - Yes I am, and everybody should be. I'll be 'Free'? - I'm as free as I let myself be, I guess. I don't need a God or a religion to make me free, just myself. -L

Okay, ignoring the fact that you're being very presumptuous about me in your post, I'll reply... Yes, there are several things in Science that simply cannot be proven, however those things generally provide me a very pragmatic and well-described logic. For example, I cannot prove infinity, however I understand what infinity is. I also cannot prove God, however I can understand what God is. I have faith in my understanding of both things, but I lack belief in both, also. I do not believe that there is infinity, however I believe that it's a possible concept. I do not believe in God, either, however I believe that it's a possibility there is some omnipotent power. But that's beside the point, we're talking Religion/Religious here. I believe more in Science, because as I said it provides me a very realistic reasoning that I can relate to - and therefore from that reasoning I have more faith that there is no God. However, I do realise that I *might be wrong, but I have little doubt there... The truth is, that I simply do not know if there is a God or not, however with what I have portrayed to me daily, in all probability (I think) there is no God. I'm happy this way, and I am happy to know that I am not a part of any religion. Therefore... No, I am not the same as any person that believes in a God. Oh, and I'm not religious, either. -L

It depends how you depict faith, too. I have no faith in God, or the Bible because the logic that has been portrayed to me in any religion (Christianity, Islam, Catholicism...) has been completely bastardised and has shown all too evidently that these religions are only for a few greedy needs. However, I do have faith in Science, that it provides me the right answers through logic and Math. I also have faith in my cat, that it will eat the cat food I put out for him, and faith in my dishwasher (most of the time) that it will clean my dishes when I turn it on... Don't get me wrong, I have faith, however faith is nothing more than confidence that something is correct. I also have many other invisible things, like Trust, Honor, Pride, Morals, Ethics, Standards... -L Edit: Also, a definition is merely a guide to meaning. The meaning is determined by the individual, how cloudy that meaning may be would only depend on the linguistic skill of the individual.

'yes, but thats ON AVERAGE.... not always...' However, if the number goes low enough it no longer stays as an average and becomes a constant. 'and by that logic, that would mean you are reaching it around and f***ing yourself.' No, because the population density would be so high that we'd all be crushed (for it to reach a level of 0.00000), but theoretically you'd be fucking the closest person crushed into you, or they'd be fucking you. -L

If sea levels keep rising, that number will keep falling... Oh, but then I guess there's Swine Flu! Gah

I think that we should all agree to disagree. This is simply a discussion of definition - I believe that if you're religious about something, you must have a belief in a certain relative deity, strictly speaking of course. However, if you simply have some beliefs or values, then that's what they are exactly. If you, for example, simply don't know whether God does or doesn't exist, and simply sit on the fence of the matter, I think it's fair to say that you do not have any religion. I also think that if you don't believe in any kind of deity, then you also have no religion. But that's just what I define religious as. -L

Yeah, if Sprint never sucked so much. -L

I worked it out as 124 meters from me.

No, but you get why I ask the question?

Readfail. SSCI MERC GROUND WARFARE Comprehensionfail. SSCI servers are offline.

SSCI wut?

More money, amirite?