Ducky

Why can't pedo's have a political party? Conservatives do.

yes, let's watch Crossfire instead.

I almost inserted a nice holocaust joke but caught myself.

While I do enjoy the show for its humor factor, It has an obvious liberal slant. It's not 'gnerally even'.

I think Worthless nearly explained it in full for me already. They already pay too much as it is. Because you legally worked hard for something doesn't mean you should be forced to give it up because someone else wants you to. Does it suck that there are plenty of people in the world that need money even for basic survival? Sure. No one is required to help though. That's a choice that resides in the individual. You spend a good portion of your life learning a craft that few have the ability to do. You work incredible hours, often miss your family and simply don't get the time to sit and enjoy small things on your way to monetary success. When you finally get there, you are rewarded by the government by them taking a larger percentage of your earnings than someone who works at Mcdonalds part time for 20 hours a week and does little but sit around and play video games?

This topic is one of few conservative viewpoints I actually take.

Again, WTH are you talking about. I'm talking about Christmas as it pertains to the context of holidays in which Syrus is going on about. Easter isn't even in Winter. I will edit my post to say Christmas, but Easter was only a side comment.

What are you going on about? The winter solstice was celebrated long before jesus was around. A celebration of the harvest of newly slaughtered cattle, fermented wine and other such things. Harvest doesn't solely pertain to crops. Fool

That's what the winter festival was about until christians jacked it and merged thier own traditions.(CHRISTMAS Sort of took on a whole new meaning eh? Forget celebrating a good harvest year, it's about a religious figure now. The most popular tradition will take precedence. It has always been that way and always will be that way. But while it is, Happy Easter. I enjoy chocolate and bunnies. I can at least prove they are real.

Our opinion right? http://www.globalwatchwalmart.com/photos/uncategorized/moore2.jpg http://images.ashley.hosts.rumandmonkey.com/memes/!@#$%^&*got/Fabulous.jpg

This is along the same premise as any other "What if" garbage created for an audience. I had a friend believing in witches and magical en!@#$%^&*ies for months after he watched something lame on the history channel.

9/11 Conspiracy of some sort riddled with twisted facts and what not.

Oh man... haha. A man walks down the street and steps in bubblegum. He stops and looks towards the trap that awaits a next victim. No one steps in it. He, Santa Claus and Hitler rob the 7/11 because of it. That had just about as much logical flow as your statement.

I have mad dodge skills. Interpretation of something is left to the reader and will not always be covered when you slap the term Libel and Lying with it. It wasn't lying. Muslims are a violent community. Opinion? Aye. And founded justly also. I saw the cartoon and interpretted it as a satirical play on what on the outside seems like a violent religion in general. Killing others in the name of a figurehead. --------------- The following is a characature about a situation during the clinton era. http://clinton-legacy.org/humor/gifts_cartoon_010219.jpg The administration were nothing but fat slob thieves? Isn't that libel if it were printed? Aren't millions of editorial cartoons like this printed everyday in newspapers. Either, you interpret it differently or you only speak up about random things that you claim break laws only when it affects you specifically. Both are personal faults.

That's silly Monte. It's all about email now adays.

I don't understand your first statement. Doesn't it indicate that Suddam trusted Germany. The agents got the information; but it doesn't exactly claim it was willingly handed over for the purpose it was used for.

I quit watching it about 30 seconds in when they showed the first quote by a FOX reporter.

Lost me on that one.

But Jesus and Moses are portrayed in various sarcastic natures all the time. Aileron just hasn't burned down my house because of it yet.

I will take Cedric the Entertainers character viewpoint from the Barbershop on that one quick. "There are three things that Black people need to tell the truth about. Number one: Rodney King should've gotten his !@#$%^&* beat for being drunk in a Honda a white part of Los Angeles. Number two: O.J. did it! And number three: Rosa Parks didn't do nuthin' but sit her Black !@#$%^&* down!"

Why the !@#$%^&* would he be banned because of insulting? Let alone acting stupid. He has every right to act whatever way he wants so long as it's with-in the zone specified rules. To those seeing him as an annoyance; ?ignore is implemented in game as well as in life. Apparently because the cartoon was published; it was with-in it's own limitations. I won't live forever, but I'm surely not about to start fires or yell back at someone for a cartoon about poor white trash. The ability to disregard such things is a strength. The inability for others to do so when I am able to is a weakness. Physical harm.Any and all words are capable of offending anyone. So why are some simply more tolerable than others? People themselves decide what they interpret and respond to. The cartoon shouldn't have been published; just out of mere courtesy if anything. But the cartoon doesn't harm anyone strong enough to note it as satire from another person perspective. Your reasons are invalid as far as I am concerned. Caricature (Which this is) is defined as the following; To represent or imitate in an exaggerated, distorted manner. As far as I am aware; it isn't considered libel at some point. Otherwise, there wouldn't be that weekly picture of the president in every paper saying; doing or commenting on something exagegrated. No one said they didn't. Let people !@#$%^&* and yell, hilarity will ensue. You won't be laughing; mainly because you get offended by words; but I will laugh two times as hard for the both of us. MorTality Monte :-p

And that effects someone how. Other than hurting someones emotional feelings because they don't understand people will say what they want, when they want; how is it harming anyone in the slightest bit. People feeling bad? There was no reason to print the cartoon as it proved no valid point; but someone did regardless. Who the !@#$%^&* cares? "Hey, that's your opinion; I know who Muhammed is and what he stands for. You disagreeing with me is no reason to get upset." "Sounds like a good plan."

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FCE...F0-DD1F354F1D9A Haha. You can't buy good comedy like this. I say do it; Free speech is free speech right? I won't ever understand why this was taken as it was. Whatever happened to Sticks and Stones? People who get upset over words are weak. Nothing more or less.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FCE...F0-DD1F354F1D9A Haha. You can't buy good comedy like this. I say do it; Free speech is free speech.

I'm one of the few who believe people put too much emphasis on racism where it doesn't exist. In my opinion regarding political caricatures; generally anything regarding a person of another race will always have features and ideas used that the race itself will find offensive. I don't personally believe it to be racism 'in essence' however due to the drawing being what it is at its root: An elaborate picture of warped perception. Hard for me to explain.