Ducky

No, we know you aren't a religious fanatic. We understood that when you want to kill everyone and yet still believe in the 10 Commandments.

Rofl Bye

I wasn't aware Christians were the only charity organization for both faith and material means. My bad

I am still in shock myself Bacchus. But then I recall the majority of christian faithed americans and realize how things came to be. Although I wouldn't mind every last bible thumper to be mercifully slaughtered by my god, I must respect the decision of majority no matter how inane those views tend to be. Unlike 2000 where he did not recieve the popular vote, I will give him support this 4 years. He did not desearve the win then, but he does now.

I thought it was funny to hear that the younger voters had the same turnout as they did in 00 despite wide speculation that there would be a dramatic increase. In other words, PUFFY THREATENED NO ONE

It sure would be interesting. I can't take a local view of who would satisfy this areas needs better (Pittsburgh) because both candidates pour money into us. Bush has lent hand with numerous medical things and as past shows, the first lady takes care of her area also. I am hoping a win/win situation is in order for us specifically. IE, Teresa getting bored and helping the locals out

http://media.ebaumsworld.com/index.php?e=floridavoting.wmv

Heh, Liberals are sure hoping that for some miracle reason, Ohio saves them. Don't see it happening though lol

Agreed, very much an idiot because I am not stuck on century year old traditional conservative bigotted views, and those that only want to appease the people who disagreed with the prior presidential term. Despite fancy wording and overthought "logic", You tend to throw out the most inane garbage more than most in this forum. If I prefer Yellow over Red and Blue, who in the world are you to tell me to choose between Red and Blue. You can wait for things to be broken all you want before mending, but you should fix and upgrade things before it breaks as soon as sign of tension is seen. Learn that if anything. Now if you would, begone and realize that it is your !@#$%^&*ty media views and spins that make people like me say !@#$%^&* you and your election. Oh Noes

I am liberal, people have noticed. I don't take a stance on the election though as I don't like Kerry or Bush. I don't feel I "Need" To vote someone who is a lesser evil. That is absurd. I see Bush winning overall, but I am interested to see the final populus vote rather than electoral.

I am gonna watch the daily show for this one. GO JOHN STEWART AND YOUR BLATANT LIBERAL SLANT.

You misread his statement. Without reproduced children, there is no one new to "learn" those acts of violence. It was said without any conclusion involving genetics.

He should have been found long ago way before Iraq.

Posts: 300 Joined: Oct 12, 2003 300 Posts in a year is no life? !@#$%^&*, where am I

It's no different than the girl who got mutilated from the seriel killer last month. I didn't care about her, don't see why I should about someone else. Not to say I am not just and believe the people responsible should have nothing done to them. But It isn't my call to carry those things out.

I didn't notice an outcry from the other beheadings. Heh. Didn't recognize any names also. Must be my anti war care. Bad things are happening to good people. Suprise suprise?

It's an efficiency issue. It isn't broke, it doesn't need fixed. But who wouldn't mind an upgrade? Isn't that the theory over the past few decades? We need newer and better things?

http://www.informationhigh.net/upload_files/grammarnazi.jpg

Heh, because we don't use the war at all in our political agendas :-p

I took the slave comment as, "How long exactly does France have to be the US' yes man before he can think for himself again."

Your arguement not applying to general animals and just humans was my arguement.

I gave no definate number as I don't know it Drake. The latter 10% could be 9.9% disabled for all I know. The system does need worked out, and to meet Bacchus' point, I would prefer to live in an over expended system that is righteous to it's people than one that turns the other eye. Although that seems the course of action for most things important, I wouldn't mind it being better.

Woot woot Israel

Was he trying to justify it? I must have missed that part.

We could kill two birds with one stone? Give christian conservatives the lead with welfare and let them tweak it. I assume Monte is raising the point that welfare abuse is a minority, and that the majority of people honestly do need it. It seems he is taking a crack of the over exaggerated conservative view on the subject. 9x% of people are only supported by welfare within a 2 year period; those that extend that period of time are disabled to the point of needing it and abusers. 9x% is a good number, so the issue needs only tweaked as earlier mentioned. I agree that corruption in the system needs to end, but the majority of say (drug users) are in the situation where that welfare is needed, and the goverment has an incredibly hard time catching those who dishonor the system and determining whether or not the money is for legit reason. That last paragraph can be ripped apart, but I can't think of how to word it more appropriately at the moment.