SVS

newbie

M. A. D.

autism

Rofl. You sir are an !@#$%^&* hat. http://sscouncil.com/bang.php Go there, note that it also contains the same language. Scan up to the prior posts and also see that they contain the same language. Good day sir !@#$%^&* hat. SVS

The only problem with your post is that no where did I say schitt had disrupted the security of the zone. I will quote myself.. AGAIN, just for you. Please refer back to the original post for more details. Also, the guidelines you posted suggests actually disrupting the security, does not say anything about THREATS to do so. I threat newbies everyday that I will come to their houses and stomp their nads out. Doesn't mean that I'm a criminal. Either way, the ban isn't legit. You know, I really can't help it if you can't read. This has already been quoted multiple times but I will do it one more time just for you (please learn to read, kkthx). *Read the bold section*

The only problem with your post is that no where did I say schitt had disrupted the security of the zone. I will quote myself.. AGAIN, just for you. Please refer back to the original post for more details.

cheese

Ban replaced by Viligante. Due to improper removal by a non BanG admin. The only people allowed to remove a network ban are bang admins or the person who placed it, seeing as how you are neither it was very wrong for you to touch it. I suggest next time you follow the guidelines, I know you are aware of them seeing as how you were there when they were adopted. SVS

latex

As he should be, little !@#$%^&*hat. He was annoying but I never thought he would do something like deleting all the posts in the general forum!

. Actually you have been pretty light on facts and very high on opinion. It isn't worth debating someone who doesn't care what facts anyone cites, who doesn't care when people point out how faulty his reasoning is. It is worth trolling though, you troll, I troll, we all troll. I wanted a debate of the issue, you wanted to just try to spin everything anyone says by citing your opinion as fact, that bores me so commence the trolling once more! Good day.

Stupid

Spyed isn't network banned.

At this point I now will explain why I told Viligante there was nothing wrong with his network ban. http://www.ssforum.net/index.php?showtopic=10804 One of the reasons for schitts network ban was threats to compromise the security of an SSC server which is clearly defined in the guidelines as being punishable by a network ban. I gave Viligante the go ahead for his ban because it was a ban with a reason obviously within the guidelines. If any of you doubt whether schitt actually did threaten DS and SSCC... how hard is it to believe that someone who would be pissed off enough to redirect the DS website to a porn site would be pissed off another to threaten the security of the server... or even pissed off enough to actually DO harm. I am sorry MTN had to be abusive and get your hopes up schitt but it is a *valid* ban. MTN never should of touched it and hopefully he will refrain from doing so in the future.

Please link me the quote bolded, if you can't find it effectivly removed any credibility you've established on this forum and declaired yourself bat!@#$%^&* crazy with a hint of partisan hackery. Please stop trying to use logic based comparisons, you're failing miserably. You just blew away your own arguement, the Palestinians have been given land to live on. YOU LOSE KTHXDRVTHRUNO!@#$%^&*INGREFUNDS. It was british owned land, who passed it over to the UN to divey it up, YOU LOSE AGAIN SIR. Aren't you the one who talks about spewing what others tell you all the time?http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_independe...mandate_end.php We just need to ignore Sever. He lacks any rational reasoning skills and a basic factual knowledge of current events.

The Native Americans are not at war with America and are happy to live on their land. If they were not happy then we'd need to do something about it, but its been quiet for the last century or so so i don't think there needs to be anything done. Muslims are constantly warring with Israel and its not just extremists. HAHA

We are on the same page. No matter how much security you have at the entrance to a plane, there is absolutely no way to prevent people from bringing something on board. If they want to smuggle explosives onto the plane and blow a hole in the skin of the plane over the Atlantic they are going to find a way to do it. Anyone who boards a plane thinking otherwise is kidding themselves. Still, even taking into account potential terrorist actions, flying commerical air is still statistically much safer then driving.

Hard to leave this game isn't it? Sorry things went sour for your zone in your absence. SVS

Please don't spam this forum. Closed.

Lebanon defending its country would of been disarming Hezballoh. Instead they allowed Hezballoh to grow, become intertwined in the government, and to continue to attack Israel. Inevitably bringing war. Lebanon has failed to protect its citizens from the start (By not acting to prevent full scale conflict between Lebanon and Israel), what makes you think they are in any posistion to do anything now? SVS

Its not irrational to point out that the extreme of indiscriminate killing would be to drop a nuke on Lebanon. I'm not actually suggesting that should be done. What the !@#$%^&* is your problem anyway? Point out where what i've said is irrational or shut the !@#$%^&* up. You can jump on the bandwagon that other posters have set up for you but if you can't back it up then you're a bigger re!@#$%^&* than they are. . You are right, pointing out an extreme would not by itself be considered asinine but you tried to cloak the irrationality of your opinions by being inflammatory. You ignore facts and just repeat your opinions over... and over... It doesn't matter what the facts are, what international law is, what the UN resolutions ordered, what the general international consensus of an act of war is, YOU DON'T CARE! No matter what facts we present to form our opinions you ignore *everything* and just repeat the same pile of crap we have already heard and when you find you can't do that anymore you just decide to say something completely absurd and inflammatory thinking it will make us forget how idiotic you are. That is why I stopped discussing this with you, this is why no one wants to discuss anything with you. There is no discussion present when you just repeat propaganda like a parrot. SVS

Your point? Are you suggesting this should be done? My point, if you did not grasp it, is that you have two extremes in this situation where you can destroy a whole country with no regard for civilians or you can send in forces who will take them out selectively. Then there are lots of ways in between, one of which Israel has chosen. I think they've gone too far into the realms of indiscriminate killing since they've destroyed whole sections of Beirut. Rockets cannot be fired from Beirut over the border and so the only reason Israel would have is that "the word is" Hezbollah has alot of support in that area. That isn't good enough reason to bomb such a large area. No, I was only pointing out how irrational you are. Good day.

HMM

So basicly your rationale is that since they don't "know" what Hezbollah is up to they are not held responsible for that groups actions within the countries borders? Dispite the fact they DO know that Hezbollah frequently attacks Israel. Dispite the fact they allow Hezbollah to take part in the government. Dispite the fact they refuse to deploy their armed forces along the southern border and disarm Hezbollah. Riggghhhhtttttt... ya, Lebanon is COMPLETELY innocent in all this. No offense, but I think at this point in time it is clear you lack any logical reasoning abilities and I must decline any further discussion with you. It is the responsility of the government to find these things out and monitor the populace to ensure the saftey of its people and that their laws are being followed. It is also the job of the governemt to secure and maintain their borders. The situation does not change who is responsible. If the minutemen organisation started attacking Mexican imigrants the US government would still be resopnsbile regardless of if they were involved in the planning. Exactly right Wonderer. This also happens to be why Israel has attacked Lebanon. To provide safety to the citizens of Israel and to defend the countries borders. Any other nation facing a similiar situation would of reacted in the same way which is why all the hypocritical whining occuring from some member nations of the EU is so asinine.

Its not an act of war from Lebanon. Its a particular terrorist organisation who do not own or operate the airport or South Beirut. This just shows how misinformed you are. Hazbollah is a part of the legitimate government of Lebanon. By allowing them to take part in government, by not deploying the army allowing the southern border, and by not forcing them to disarm... Lebanon is just as responsible for their actions.