NBVegita

I've had bugs with the auto update script on nfl.com/scores. It will work for a while, random time frame, sometimes 5 mins then ff crashes, sometimes I can get it for almost an hour before it crashes.

Band Camp

I do believe that is what I was talking about. And I never knew balls were gay. I kinda thought they were an impartial party in the battle. Poor balls. Poor balls.

In no particular order: Vodka on the rocks (not bartons!) Vodka & cranberry Jager bombs (but the real way) Most non dry wine margarita (a must!) Most martini's (vodka) So. Co. and unsweetened Iced tea And as for beer...not really a huge fan. Only time I really drink it was at party's or out at a bar with friends. Sometimes you just can't afford to drink mixed drinks all night lol

Actually you would be committed to a mental hospital under the pretense of attempted suicide. Plain and simple, something you intake into your body that negetively effects brain function and your body, some of which have long term effects, some causing death, all containing many volatile chemicals, it is bad. Even the guys who are advocates/use them say that they're bad. I don't see how they cannot be bad, even the other guys (or so it seems) at least agree with me on that point.

This is something I would consider lending my services to.

I could organize it in 10 mins.

Kudos to cubs for being the first botter since mmav to actually spend most of his time working on bots supposed to talking about it...or making a pokemon bot.

dinosaur

You're trying to pull something out of your !@#$%^&*. I'm not oversimplifying, nor did I ever try to infer that you think pot is good. All I have been doing in every single post is restating my thesis that pot is bad, and will never become legal by just proving its not as bad as two other bad drugs. Whats over simple, or inferring in that?

10. You have ever played a game of SubSpace for more than 24 hours. 09. You don't have macros because you can type that fast now. 08. Your girlfriend calls your computer the "2nd woman" 07. You forgot you turned on ?log and have a 40Mb session.log file 06. You can predict what a green will give you 05. You completely refuse to tell anyone your usage 04. You have so much trash around your computer you need a snowshouvel to get to the fridge. 03. It's never occured to you to wonder why there are walls inspace. 02. You made a 'Songs I like hearing when playing SS' playlist And the #1 way to tell 01. You wake up in the middle of the night screaming "DID YOU SEE THAT FREAKING LAGGER GO THROUGH THOSE MINES!" (7/10) Well 5 is mostly because I really don't know anymore because I've forgotten the passes to my early accounts lol And for anyone who says #8...you and I must have a talk!!! Those japanese toys that you plug into your usb ports really are dangerous!!!

...when your friends only use your ss nick to refer to you irl. ...when both of your parents not only know what a "newb" is, they also use it to refer to people they work with.

SSCU

ownt.

Either that or the woman should be allowed to wear a big hat that says "I <3 Jesus. He is teh l337."

The issue I think Syrus is bringing up is the fact that muslims are allowed to outwardly show religious symbols because they are "impractical to hide under uniform". And if they can do, This woman should be able to wear her cross out of her uniform. My stand on the issue...I don't see why its such a big deal to wear your cross underneath your clothing. If you really love your religion, you don't need to wear it for the world to see. Wear it in your heart as thats all that matters. But that goes both ways. If you are really dedicated to your god, it shouldn't matter if you are wearing a turban, a cross, or anything at all. None of that matters in the least. Wearing a cloth on your head doesn't make you closer to god, neither does wearing a piece of metal on your chest.

Just an ironic quote from someone who's been debating on your side. I've never once even suggested that you think marijuana is good. I have in every post just simply been stating that it is bad. And just by the post I see that you seem to realize what my arguement is! No matter if you disagree or agree with the legalization of marijuana, it will never become legal by trying to prove if it is better or worse than smoking or alcohol. What part of that don't you understand!? Concerning my entire thesis of debate, why don't you understand that no matter how blue in the face you get trying to argue that this bad drug is better or worse than 2 other bad drugs, it is no arguement to have it legalized. This goes beyond if you agree or disagree with it.

<-- Secure enough to say I do so happen to have a penis...and am lacking a !@#$%^&*oris. Ahem. Sux for those of u who have both...def makes masterbation a two handed ordeal...kinda like patting your head and rubbing your tummy at the same time...yeah exactly like that.

laws

I am not at all talking about that film as I have not seen it, and I know it was greatly exaggerated. I'm just talking about the day to day controversies, like the repubs and the pages, and the dems and this land/money fraud thing. And I did not think you were talking about confess's post too.

That has been my whole arguement! If you work hard I have no problem with you getting aid! My problem is giving aid to those who come from poor families, do nothing about it, and expect just because their parents invest in drugs supposed to the stock market that they deserve something. That's an awful stereotype about drugs, and I don't mean it for the majority. But that has seriously been my arguement from the beginning. If you work hard, poor or not, then you should, and do get aid for school. At least in NY, as this is the only state I can make the arguement for as I am not versed with other states college and financial laws. If you should go for free or not depends on how hard you worked. The harder you work, the more money you get. If you don't work hard, you don't get money. Should be that simple.

Plain and simple, without conclusive evidence it will never be legalized. So try to step outside of that little liberal box you are living in and realize that you need conclusive evidence to make anything, pot included, legal. Our entire judicial system is based on this. I really thought it was common knowledge. When it comes down to it, it would not effect my life in anyway for it to stay illegal, or become legal. I think smoking pot is a terribly dumb thing to do, the act of smoking pot has no positive to it besides medicinal means. It's not my idea of a good time to inhale smoke containing thousands of carcinogens into my system, just to they can distort my brain function. But you know what, my opinion means squat. Your opinion means squat. In this arguement there is no room for opinion. And as long as evidence is credibly disputed there will be no legalization. I will ask you this, what do you not understand about that?

I never post anything as fact, unless I quote a study, so if I have to quote all of my posts and explain them to you like a child, as I have had to do with some of them already, I will. All of your positive effects of having it legalized are speculation. You cannot PROVE that any of those would happen. Remember, the government does not have to prove that they won't, you would have to prove that they will. If you knew anything about law in the state you are in, unless you are caught in possesion of a good amount of pot, or selling a good amount of pot, you get a slap on the hand and a fine. The majority of the pot users don't have with them/sell good amounts of pot. You guys just don't seem to get it. You have nothing but speculation. Plain and simple. If it was proven to be an advantage to making it legal, and a disadvantage for keeping illegal, it would be legal by now. You have failed at any time to argue anything beyond opinion. It is a fact, and I will state this as a fact, that there is no conclusive evidence that making marijuana legal would be good for the country. Because as you even stated in one of your posts, for every study that proves pot is good, there is one that disputes it. The problem is, at least from my personal research on the matter, is that the sources that are denouncing pot are more internationally accredited than the ones supporting it. I mean simple anology, a prosecuter lets two fellons off who have killed poeple. Now a third fellon comes up to bat, but he did bad things, just didn't kill anyone. Its ok to let him go because the other two got off, and he didn't do things as bad as them? And you yell at me for quoting things as fact, plain and simple astro there is no conclusive evidence that pot is better or worse as a whole than alcohol and or smoking.

cuddle

I have a minor in psychology thank you. And for that, these parents are not telling these kids what they can't do. They're just not telling them that they can do. It's negativety that you are showing that would influence it. This is not all parents, as some people are wretched parents and do such things to their children, but yet again, its not my fault if someone has bad parents. If its ingrained in their minds for 18 years, giving them free college won't change their minds one bit.