Bacchus

that benefit from the arms/weapons industry in USA is 10 403 billion $ and that USA alone holds 40.3% of the world weapon market. thoughts? p.s.: apart from GG USA i mean.

isn't why the USA is at war now? fear?

why not just gtfo of Itaq? then USA would stop being a victim. If the world must accept that USA is the strongest, purest, cleanest..what else? the archetypical ideal in the platonician sense of a truly GOOD nation. Then you should accept that those not in "the garden of Eden" long for redemption and prsence in the eye of the earthly gods...in fact, its their way of saying "we love you america". ok...now i can go back and rest my hangover.

Hooray, can we go to Disney now? aah yea, i'm from Quebec...no US protection now...we're such losers...

Yeah, that's why and what i'm afraid of.

(freaking keyboard) Tas said: Bacchus....ironic you tell Zig to end his 'radical' comment with Insha'alla - an Islamic arabic term meaning 'walk with Allah'. Just think about that eh? Yea, i thought about it, it was meant as sarcasm. Your account isn't far from the truth i think. but, i'm in a bar atm...drinking quite an amount of alcohol...i'll refrain from posting tonite. Nite all. Have Fun! peace.

as we speak, 10 k civilians were killed in this war. The justifications for this act of ILLEGAL war were never found. USA disrupted the world consensus. USA is killing his own in a 4 billions $$$ a day ILLEGAL conflict. USA is above dialogue, above consensus, above international law. It is basically above the law. USA is messing up. Since 1800, USA took an active part in 163 armed conflicts. USA is trigger happy, a loose canon, a dangerous war mongering nation obsessed with a "divine" mission of bringing peace by making war. And your prez fell down a bike...what a loser. And Moore won the Canne's Festival Palme d'Or. And i'm done.

lol 200 years of US history: 0.81 war a year Iraq is a country, were after Saddam or after Iraq. Get your facts straight plz. That soundd invasive and conqueror-like. mmh....you didn't thought about it very long, did you? btw, before someone starts flaming me for anti-americanism, this isn't meant as an insult (well not quite ), but Zig, you're basically saying:" Don't do as i do, but do as i say". I simply disagree. And your comment is so radical you could end it with "Insh'Allah" or something. Edited: The Picture was offensive... -nintendo64 (ok, understood Nin- Bacchus)

what'S wrong with Iraq then? oh...it's the rebels and the news..it looks like a mess but the truth is that everything is good in a perfect world...a paradise.. ok, now i get it. oh, and pollution is also a WMD.

Well, you should...after all you're the one responsible for other people posting moronic thoughts about it...

ok, would you be my friend then?

hum..no. We don't need "answers" to stop whining about it. US gov. sucks that's it. End of transmission, End of discussion. US blundered in Vietnam they are blundering in Iraq, that's the end of it. What's the fuss about? Isn't it clear enough? All in all, wether there'S conspiracy or not, who cares? USA LOSED THAT FECKING WAR!!!! JUST ADMIT IT! YOU WERE WRONG! that's about it.

hey, i suspect the usa to use torture on prisoners at Guantanamo bay...if i go there with Amnesty international, will they let me in?

lol, the only thing it's proving right now is that they found a sarin nerve gaz s-*BAD WORD*- somewhere in Iraq.

Who's siding with the terrorists? Iraqis? lol, considering it was the USA that armed, trained and paid Osama and Saddam...i wonder....

No it isn't, but what's your point in returning the question?

What's your thoughts about that: Jack Reed (d) :" do you think couching naked for 45 mins while being questionned is humane?" P.Wolfowitz, Joint Def. Secretary:" blabla" Jack Reed (d):"no no, answer the question: do you think that crouching naked for 45 mins while being questionned is humane??" P.Wolfowitz: *pause* "I don't know" Jack Reed:" How about sleep deprivation for 36 hours, sir?" P.Wolfowitz:*pause*"i don't know" And this man is USA Joint Defense Secretary...lol. pathetic.

mine?

hehe, rofl. seeing you guys freaking out at referendums...i understand why you'd want us to hush

because Quebec's western frontier is Ontario, southern frontier is Maine and NY. That's why oh, and because Quebec is generally regarded as a "rogue" province by the rest of Canada. mind you, not surrounded as in "under attack".

-*BAD WORD*-. That's depressing. i had the sound off. No thoughts. Just stop the madness.

it's all in your head, Brain...all in your head.

pathetic emotions heh? very biased reporter? rofl, you're a farce Ail. I never even saw a supported opinion coming from you. nada, nothing, rien. So please, find something else. Thomas Aquinas has rewritten parts of platonician and aristotelician philosophy with the objective of re-founding christian dogmas. It's dating back to what? twelfth, thirteenth century? Haven't you heard about about Rousseau, Locke, Mill, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Nietzche, Heidegger, Foucault...etc. No you haven't. International law is about ethics and ethics are a thing of consensus. Once upon a time, some founders sat together and thought about ideas that would protect people from harm. an ideology of respect, dialogue and consensus. This is your Cons!@#$%^&*ution. International rights are based on the same "effort" at dialogue and consensus. It was thought, written and implemented through a will to have a more peaceful, stable, better world. By being unilateral and by rejecting the UN consensus, US Gov. just spat on all that, declared it unfit and looked the other side pretending to be "pure, and good". in other words: US defiled the basic principles upon what its justifying its Foreign Affairs policies. In short, US Gov. is the epitome of hypocrisy. If you think that Democracy can be "implemented", you're living in a LIE. It only means you don't even understand the word :"democracy". And if you don't understand the word, you can't understand what consensus is and even less "International Law". Petty emotions? off course, people that are obscured and obtuse, polluted by so many misunderstanding and prejudice, usually pisses me off.

no, no, no...not quite.. Live was saying that the iraqis were graduating from barbarism 101 to submission 201 under the ever loving eyes of the glorious american soldiers. Hence the analogy between peeing and undergraduates initiation. Next they'll have a drinking party at Orlando beach with nude "saved" iraqis women flashing their boobs to the watchful eyes of CNN and everyone will be happy again. Gotta love american pedagogic strategy!

aha, Ail...your country is one of the most criminalised country in the world, one of the most violent and one most certainly the most criticized. US seen almost as an nmy by half the world and 3/4 of it is angry at US. and you dare post those kind of comments: by whom moral authority can you say such bs? By your words, if my country doesn't have enough military might to ensure a political stability, you'll demote the my country gov and replace it with something more to your liking??? This is called "Dictatorship"...o yea, true...typical US procedure! you did it in chiapas, you did it in Iraq..it was US who put Saddam in power in the first place. political idea! laugh. Come on, you losed. It's over, done. It's a second Vietnam or whatever. Us army just isn't ready to face this kind of context.