SVS

Cool

If you are going to move a thread out of the SSC forum please don't leave a link. Sure I "play" this game still. You?

You make yourself look re!@#$%^&*ed in every single attempt to insult me. Seriously, I don't know what makes you think this stuff is "cool" before you type it. This is one of the more pathetic posts in the history of this forum system yet you actually try to end it with a jab at me. Nice... Bravo to you kind sir! Oh, by the way, you might want to correct your signiture. It is a tad (okay, REALLY) incorrect. Cheers, SVS

Me Better question is why would anyone want to go to Seattle in the middle of winter?

So why is halo music being played and tested in it? HAHAHA Because they are trying to gain population for the zone by tricking players into visiting it when they intend to visit Halo. There is no rule against it, it is just rather "lame"

I will keep reposting this until you wake up and UNDERSTAND IT. Agreed. Good thing Iran don't want nukes, aren't making nukes and have never expressed a desire to have nukes. The reason why no one cares to read your posts Sever is you keep posting your opinions as absolute facts. You have no way of knowing Iran's intention for nuclear weapons (for sure), none of us do. If your opinion is that their goal is not to ever develop a nuclear warhead that is fine, go ahead and state that. But stop stating your opinions as absolute facts especially when it is obvious you have no way of knowing the accuracy of your statement. You are saying that FOR SURE Iran is not after nuclear weapons and when we confront you on that claim (a claim you obviously are not capable of making since you aren't the Iranian government) you back it up by saying that there is no EVIDENCE that they are after nuclear weapons. Well for starters you are wrong that there is no EVIDENCE (Iran has purchesed nuclear technology specificly related to developing nuclear warheads from Pakistan, why would they purchase such information if they weren't planning on eventually building them, feel free to argue whether or not this is evidence but as I am about to point out...) but that doesn't even matter because we are only saying that you can't possibly know for certain that the Iranian government is not after nuclear warheads. It doesn't matter if there is no evidence (in your opinion) or not, the fact still remains that you are claiming absolute knowledge of a governments intentions when you have no way of knowing the truthfulness of your statement. This is obvious to everyone BUT you. I don't really know what else to say to you at this point, I hope you now understand why we have a problem with how you express your OPINIONS.

Agreed. Good thing Iran don't want nukes, aren't making nukes and have never expressed a desire to have nukes. The reason why no one cares to read your posts Sever is you keep posting your opinions as absolute facts. You have no way of knowing Iran's intention for nuclear weapons (for sure), none of us do. If your opinion is that their goal is not to ever develop a nuclear warhead that is fine, go ahead and state that. But stop stating your opinions as absolute facts especially when it is obvious you have no way of knowing the accuracy of your statement.

You can't help but make fun of him JUST for the "I'm the decider" line. I am a Republican and I think it is just GREAT!

Remember, President Bush is the "decider"

Agreed. Good thing Iran don't want nukes, aren't making nukes and have never expressed a desire to have nukes. The reason why no one cares to read your posts Sever is you keep posting your opinions as absolute facts. You have no way of knowing Iran's intention for nuclear weapons (for sure), none of us do. If your opinion is that their goal is not to ever develop a nuclear warhead that is fine, go ahead and state that. But stop stating your opinions as absolute facts especially when it is obvious you have no way of knowing the accuracy of your statement.

Depends on what you are printing, in some cases (depending on the quality of the printer in question), you would be correct.

I would agree that the war in Iraq has fueled the efforts of terrorism accross the region however I disagree with the notion that pulling out of Iraq would help the situation. To pull out would leave open a huge power vacuum, a vacuum that would more likely be filled by terrorist networks then the legitimate government of Iraq.

Not really, Bush has already moved on to new figure heads of evil.

Also true.

It means that for some reason they were unable to deliver the package. The address could be wrong, the recipient could of been away. Something that prevented it from being delivered once it reached whatever city in Canada it was destined for.

The tracking number shows the package was attempted to be delievered in Canada I just checked it.

Halo isn't down right now, I am sitting in it as we speak.

If it is true it would hardly be surprising.

I read about this a long time ago, it is OLD news. Anyways, if you don't want to worry about it don't eat "Diet" foods. In most cases people eating that crap would lose their sanity if they knew what had been done to it to make it "Lighter"

The fear isn't so much that Iran will get and use nuclear weapons, the fear is more that once they acquire them they will provide them to extremist factions who WILL use them. Although I really don't know how rational that fear is. It doesn't take a genious to forsee the US obliterating Iran if an Iranian made nuke ends up taking a chunk out of a US city. Just the fact that the US still has enough nuclear weapons to completely destroy the earth should be enough to prevent even the most pyschotic leader from helping proliferate nuclear weapons. Just one US ICBM is enough to entirely wipe out most countries. It is fairly frightening to think about This doesn't mean we should allow them to go ahead and develop them, just because other nations possess them doesn't mean everyone should have them. It would be nice to go back in time and kill any person who ever considered using fision to create weapons but that is unrealistic. We have to live with the situation we have been dealt and it is better off for everyone involved if LESS not MORE nations have nuclear arsenals.

I am an athiest. I was confirmed Catholic but I never held any belief in that organized religion nor any other organized religion. No one here is arguing that Catholicism has not also done its far share of violance (If they were to do so it would be asinine), what I pointed out along with several other people in this thread is the current propensity towards violance by certain segmants of CURRENT Muslim populations. Physical violance carried out over a quote (or a cartoon) being read is just rediculous and if you can't understand why that concerns rational people then I don't know what to tell you. We could go on and on over which faith has slaughtered more people in the name of god but that discussion is not what my post and the general point of this thread is about. If you are unable to enter into a discussion ON topic without resorting to insults and SWEEPING accusations about the personal education or beliefs of every single poster in disagreement with you... you should probably stop reading threads in this forum.

I guess my opinion on the site is if you are going to do something illegal, you might as well not pay anything at all.

The pope wasn't even expressing his personal opinion on the subject, he was quoting a 14th century emperor. The reaction by some segments of the Muslim community is rediculous and would be halarious (if it weren't so !@#$%^&*ing frightening). Let us all take notes on what is okay for people to say about Islam. You may not redicule Islam in any way. Be it thorugh CARTOONS or reading QUOTES. If you dare read a QUOTE that Muslims do not like no matter how long ago the quote was made you better be prepared for buildings to be burned and people to be murdered. Because isn't it rational to get all worked up over a QUOTE from the 14th CENTURY. I mean holy !@#$%^&*ing !@#$%^&*. What the !@#$%^&*ing !@#$%^&* is wrong with some people.

It is a legal gray area in RUSSIA which is why dispite !@#$%^&*ing and moaning from dozens of countries Russia has been unable to shut it down. It is much like how The Pirate Bay is immune because in its home country its specific actions are legal. In most western countries (EU/USA/ETC) it IS illegal. If you live in any country where it is ILLEGAL then you are not LEGALLY acquiring that property. So unless any of you happen to live in Russia or one of the few handfuls of nations that view this as legal using this site to download music is not a legal act. Just something to keep in mind. PS - doc flabbys post is similiar to mine which is why I quoted it.

Erm, I used to own a D-Link Wireless Router that I used at my house... upgraded awhile back but I was able to control the amount of BW given to different people connecting. I would read the help file that came with the router and if needed you can also call Tech Support. Keep in mind that if you got a cheapie that you get what you pay for. Less expensive models have less features.