Jump to content
SSForum.net is back!

Lynx

★ VIP
  • Posts

    2397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lynx

  1. Holy !@#$%^&* I nearly fell off my chair!
  2. Meh, he saw my !@#$%^&*... -Lynx
  3. You spent that much... calling somebody a pomp!@#$%^&* !@#$%^&*.. I !@#$%^&*ing hate you.. -Lynx
  4. Meh, I've got nothing better to do... than to bump another post showing how re!@#$%^&*ed Aceflyer is.. Wheee Right, so then I can be unbanned, and you can carry on with life as usual, without serving any kind of punishment (Albeit not an "official" punishment, but I think the fact that you're now a complete laughing stock, is more than good enough in my books) If you're facing any kind of technical difficulties with the ignore function, then you should talk to somebody who knows about how that function works (And, yes - there are plenty of people within your bubble of "friends" who do know how it works) - and if you can't overcome them technical difficulties, then you should simply avoid that player. I was in a chat - which I might add had NetOps inside it, and if I were actually breaking any kind of rules in that chat, I would have been banned anyway. The very fact that the chat had the more knowledgeable members within it while this whole thing happened, just makes the whole story even more laughable. The only thing, if anything at all that statement indicates is that either you are: i) a spineless lying !@#$%^&*, or; ii) a freaking moron, who can't even use one of the simplest tools that Continuum has to offer. Take your pick. How am I being a newb exactly? Bwahahaa This is of course, on the pretence that that player isn't such a newb that they know how to use the freaking ignore function in the first place. Nowhere in the rules does it say that SysOps have more rights to players. That rule would be completely illogical, and completely un-ethical. However, it would of course, make it a lot easier for abusive ASSS such as yourself to get more le-weigh and e-penis on this game, so feel free to keep muttering that kind of bull!@#$%^&*. I'll just sit here smiling at how re!@#$%^&*ed you look. Again, this is a complete figment of the basic and failed imagination from the clouded pathetic excuse for an organic life form we know as Aceflyer. Firstly, the "wisecracking" was there for good reason, and I believe you already muttered that you understood that it was a joke.. Remember... ... and secondly, you can't get a NetOp to make a netban, because "You deem har!@#$%^&*ment" - we've all seen how you choose appropriate penalties for rule breakers. (Recalls the 61 day ban for quickwinning) - so please, do yourself a favour, and never make judgement on anything, ever again... Ever. "The relevant excerpts from logs" - I love how you said that. I that's another way of saying "This is my attempt and putting the blame on Nighthawk - even though it shows I just epicly fail more at trying to do the 'right thing'" Generally eh? Another extremely loose word to use. OKay, generally netbans are made by netops who have actually seen the offending player do something "in person" - or have a significant amount of proof. They would also generally ask various questions, not just 'walk-in-the-park' questions. Again, you fail, re!@#$%^&*. Actually, on the SSC Forum, I was trying to help you to catch people who might have been doing it. But I guess selective reading is good in these kind of things, but at the end of the day - just shows that you are again, an idiot. And the reason you ignored me? Stop looking at symptoms, and look at causes. -Lynx
  5. Lol, Kudos. -Lynx
  6. But... They actually painted a plane, for a prank. Custom painting a car is expensive enough - but a freaking plane? That's basically the kind of boredom that Michael Jackson faces -Lynx
  7. Uh, that's not the dumbest thing he's thought.. (The so called "encryption" with our "BOP keys"... including Animates magical hot dog of Penis Zone being a critical key in the equation)... Oh, and not to mention rootbear75... -Lynx
  8. Haha... The 61 day ban for quick winning on the grounds that it is actually "hacking the client"... Anyway, I find it interesting how somebody can be netbanned because they refuse to leave a chat (Which is only owned by if anybody: the owners of the biller) - and furthermore netban by stamping "har!@#$%^&*ment" onto the claim. That's a pretty firm har!@#$%^&*ment rule - and it's something that rarely happens, however... I guess he "deems" his own rules. -Lynx
  9. attraction wants noods. -Lynx
  10. I'm not even going to reply to your post Ace - that was just... really stupid, even by your standards. I will apologise to Nighthawk for disrespecting him as much as I did - but again, he should have known Aceflyer was a newb, and probably should have asked for some evidence. I'm still not thrilled by the way this was later handled too, but that's another story I'm not really willing to go into. Also, I second Ceriums prediction that nothing will happen to Aceflyer - he's already weaned/!@#$%^&*-sucked his way into his comfortable little circle, and quite depressingly, even the more educated of that circle can't seem to see his transparency. Oh well, it's not like Subspace has ever followed the "qespondeat superior" trend, so I won't expect much more to come of this. I guess people can just read this and laugh at the foolishness of the under educated. -Lynx
  11. Wow, expensive hoax.. -Lynx
  12. He was talking to nighthawk, not you. Maybe
  13. Meh, if you had talked to me initially, I'm sure it would have all be fixed before this, I guess it's just a lesson learned. Cheers, -Lynx ---- Also, MTN - I'm not sure exactly what message you're trying to convey, and I'm not sure exactly how much you know of who initiates the talking and who doesn't - so I'll ignore my urge to retort to that comment.
  14. I PM'd Nighthawk as soon as I found out that he net banned me. Ab asino lanam That's as far as warning went, and I suppose in this case, is as far as warning will go. No doubt Nighthawk will face no repercussions as the ban was only a day, but I guess that will only publicly show exactly how !@#$%^&*ed up the SSC still is, even with SVS out of the picture. Good job night, you done well. -Lynx
  15. Well, he obviously has no understanding of how the ignore feature works - otherwise I wouldn't be net banned for whatever I'm net banned for... Another note, nighthawk, your ban comment is about as reliable as a water baloon. -Lynx
  16. (Copied directly from the SSC Network Dispute System)
  17. OKay - I've just come back from a few days of in-activity, so I pop into Continuum to catch up... anyway, as conversations go on, I ask Aceflyer if I'm still ignored... So yeah, anybody with even a basic understanding of how the chat client works, will understand that the ignore is enforced by the client (continuum) on the users (Aceflyers, in this case) computer. Anyway, so there's the first accusation of a netban. So, as usual, I just think it's a newb being a newb, and it's not the first time a power-mongering transparent fool has threatened to netban me, so I laugh it off, in-fact, pretty much the whole chat laughs it off, and we resume in our general conversation... ... You get the jist... Anybody with any kind of basic human comprehension would understand that these are jokes too... But, meh... I guess that some people have to use Crayons for longer than others in classrooms, so for the special people (person) who did not understand that this was a joke... It was a joke. Anywho, swiftly moving on... ^^ Eh??? OKay, people make mistakes... That's understandable... but this is more than a mistake. Nighthawk... You just !@#$%^&*ed up. Firstly, you're a re!@#$%^&*. Before you make a netban, you should understand that conflicts between people often do cause clouded judgements - Aceflyer is hated by more than a small group of people, and as I stated at the beginning of the post - I've not been on-line for a while. I'd love for a biller op to cross check my IP and MacID or even IP Range for the last few times I was actually connected to the biller, just so we can all laugh at how computer illiterate Nighthawk is a little more for making this pathetic excuse for a ban. Also, my IP has not changed in the past few weeks, so it should be easy to check for any other aliases logging in. Anyway, let me explain how it "works", just for you Nighthawk... If somebody is getting cross-zone spammed, you find out their alias by reverse engineering past all of the %%%% signs that they were using (Yes, I was informed that I was apparently using %%%% enabled aliases to spam Aceflyer) - then, with that information, you talk to a billing op, who then enters that alias into the biller, and cross checks for IP/MID/IP Range/IDData matches - with that data matching, it is then safe to make a netban. However, you can't just go on a whim, and ban people as you like because they "might" be the type of person to flame Aceflyer due to the conflicts, as that is what most people would call "re!@#$%^&*ed behaviour"... I hope you're following Nighthawk, if not, PM me and I'll draw you some nice pictures with annotation so you can understand better. Secondly, I've never "har!@#$%^&*ed" Aceflyer using any alias, let alone any alias other than L Y N X - we've had conversations, and we agreed to stop flaming each other, however, he then started flaming me again, so I kindly returned the favour. If you can provide any evidence of me doing otherwise, I'll be more than happy to prove that evidence as false. Also, to Aceflyer - please show me how I "admitted" to spamming you, and further more, if you can't take people talking !@#$%^&* to you on the internet, then don't initiate the !@#$%^&* with them. I'd also like to take this time to say that I've never actually done anything "over the top" to Aceflyer, he's just a sensitive little girl about his e-reputation. Furthermore, Nighthawk, I'd love if you could reply to me instead of pming me back when I say "Hey" but then freezing up when I actually ask you about your actions. Cheers, it's been fun -Lynx
  18. Ah yeah.. My bad, okay.. It's cooler now.. -Lynx
  19. I get 20MBPS near enough the whole time, great customer support, no downtime... But if I do get a letter threatening me with any kind of legal action, I'll leave them. The chances of me getting such a letter are.. slim. I don't even use Torrents much any more, I prefer using Private Networks with the TOR engine. -Lynx
  20. SSCW = Genimi Dreams old host name, right? Ew.. -Lynx
  21. This is extremely annoying, however, you can still get all of your pirating needs through other things such as the private TOR network, which uses a proxy to change your IP. Although this is slower - it is still the best way to go about it. I'm with Virgin internet, they're by far the best provider for my area (With me hitting 20MBPS near enough all the time) - and me paying a fraction of the price compared to other ISPs. I half expected this to happen though, after all there are still Virgin Mega stores, virgin TV... It's basically a small economy, and it's not surprising they're looking for their own interests as well as the "interests of it's users" by sending them threatening letters saying that they're breaking the law. It won't be long before more anonymity breaks into the "pirating" market. -Lynx
  22. Meh, I always thought flaming people on the internet was normal, I don't know why everybody is going so "Yeah the internet should be perfect, we should all talk flowers and poop butterflies".. :/ -Lynx
  23. Perfer et obdura, disce pati. -Lynx
  24. DESLEXIA ISN'T FUNNY FALAMUCKAS! Seriously though, I spell terribly in-game. Spelling Nazis should be !@#$%^&*!@#$%^&*inated anyway. -Lynx
×
×
  • Create New...