This thread is pointless and only thrives off one line of bullshit. Firstly, if you request the morning after pill - you get it. That's it... You don't get asked any other questions other than: Do you have severe liver disease? Do you suffer from porphyria (Which I might add is a *VERY* rare condition)... If either of them answers are yes, then you will be provided another form of post coital contraception. If a doctor wants to share their opinion, that's their right. Most won't, as the morning after pill is completely harmless and even on a moral ground, is hugely acceptable. If a doctor/gp/pharmacist refuses to provide you it, then they're not fit for their job - and somebody has quite obviously made a rather large flip flop somewhere hiring them into a position where their ethical judgement clouds pragmatic medical opinion. Aceflyer> Unlike clerks or pharmacists, whose jobs do not involve making judgment calls, doctors' jobs actually involve making judgment calls. Every decision about whether or not to prescribe a specific medication or whether or not to recommend a specific procedure involves a judgment call about what the doctor believes would be best for the patient. You can't regulate how people think. In the case of a pro-life doctor, for instance, he or she is not going to think that prescribing the morning after pill is best for the patient. You can't force the aforementioned doctor to make the judgment call that prescribing the MAP would be best for the patient. This is a completely fair argument on the basis that the morning after pill is going to kill them if they take it... That's about the only grounds for that argument - but is completely off-topic to the point that was being made by BaK in the initial post. Aceflyer> Medicine is an art - not a hard, black-and-white science like, say, mathematics. Doctors' professional opinions are necessarily based not only on their objective knowledge but also on their experience, feelings, instincts, and beliefs. Even many/most objective/quantitative results in medicine require an accompanying subjective analysis and judgment call based on said experience, feelings, instincts, and beliefs. Medicine isn't an art - it is a Science, we're just far too simple to treat it like a Science. Any decent doctor will only focus on how to cure you, or help you out of your problems causing the least distress as possible - and that's it. If it clouds their personal beliefs, they're in the wrong line of work. BaK> That's assuming that you can figure out that your doctor is withholding information. But you went to the doctor for the information. If you go to a doctor asking for family planning, you'll be referred to a family planning centre where the staff have been trained to provide you impartial advice. If this doesn't happen, somebody done an oopsie. Dav> I always thought if a doctor refused to treat on moral or religious grounds you had to be referd to another doctor I think this only ever happens in cases of euthanasia, which is rare and off point. -Lynx