LearJett+

Hm I'm sure those comments were necessary. This is a case where someone got owned by cold hard facts so now they're trying to pull out by calling a foul.

BooYa

I thought it made him sound more intelligent. He wasn't flaming - he was breaking down what you said and giving you facts why you were wrong.

Hmph, I don't believe that list . The word 'but' doesn't denote where anything is - does it? I thought 'but' and 'and' were the two main conjunctions, heh

They don't want a bullet to detonate a bomb, so they shoot him five times? If it was a suicide bomber wouldn't he run toward the closest group of people, instead of running away from everything?

I agree with Worthless on everything again... except one thing. (Depending on which sentence you were talking about) 'But' or 'What' are not prepositions. 'But' is a conjunction, and I'm not quite sure what 'what' is. I know it's not a preposition, however

If a suspect is running, police are taught to shoot to maim - Not shoot multiple times. When he said that he didn't literally mean realize that we were in a war. He meant that it actually hit home to a different country than the US. Some nay-sayers in Britain are pulling a 180 and now like the war. After all, approval ratings of the war went up in Britain.

I like what this guy has to say

Bush doesn't have the authority to keep Congress in session. Are you a fan of outsourcing, then? It's the same idea

Romp

Astro, have you ever taken Economics? Social security is completely over drawn. It was a great idea during the Great Depression, but now it's just not.

<3 Worthless

Biased viewpoint or not, they both present facts. Heh, oops that I read that wrong

Heh, I guess the sarcasm didn't broadcast well with my bullets comment? I agree that some, if not most, gun-related incidents are heat of the moment. However, guns are part of the culture in many regions of the United States. If we ban guns because someone things they're dangerous, then what's next? Knives? Pointy things? Who decides what's dangerous, anyway? Next thing you know, it's 1984 and we're hailing Big Brother. An interesting link. Read it. >>>>Link<<<< Hm, another one. >>>>Link<<<< ^This one says that only 4.46 homicides out of 100,000 are with a firearm.

If someone is crazy enough to kill another person, I don't think the fact that guns would be illegal would stop them. My solution is to make bullets really really expensive. Like $5000 each. If bullets were $5000, people wouldn't waste them on other people.

Obesity (hehe) If someone wants to get a gun - they'll get it. Legally or Illegally. This would just making it harder for law-abiding folks to get it, ya know, the ones who aren't going to kill anyone.

It would also abandon a government that is not yet stable. If we left now, it would still be easy for the next warlord over to just come in and take over - or for an extremist revolution to happen and a newer, worse-than-Baath party to take over. Hitler had it easy coming to power after we ditched them in the end of WWI.

Hmm... I like GWB's approach with pre-emption, but I do admit - it leaves a lot of "what-if"s. Heh, on a side note I don't think some of us would consider Social Security a success for the future. Especially when we won't have it

Lard-y

Lol it's not like there's just 10 guys in someone's basement that don't like us. There are loads of extemists. I was merely commenting however that the majority of Iraq is in fact favor of us being there. As we speak, the US is trying to make it so that we can train the Iraqis to guard their own country so that we can pull out. Whenever we see on the news about America sending more troops over, it is merely to relieve the ones there already. The local marine detachment around here is actually coming home in about a month. Lol you discount my sources because they are conservatie whereas you support your because they are liberal . As for video footage, I'll go get some consertive footage and make a movie. Deal?

Heh, simple mistake. Jab, make a new text do!@#$%^&*ent in the !@#$%^&* folder. Name it !@#$%^&*.bat. Edit it so it looks like this - "C:\Program Files\Java\j2re1.4.2_08\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\My Do!@#$%^&*ents\!@#$%^&*\!@#$%^&*pr2.jar" Where C:\Program Files\Java\j2re1.4.2_08\bin\java.exe is the complete path to java.exe and C:\My Do!@#$%^&*ents\!@#$%^&*\!@#$%^&*pr2.jar is the complete path to !@#$%^&*. (They're probably different on your computer.) Also, don't forget the quotation marks

I have Millenium Edition too, and it didn't work like that. BaK- told me to use a .bat file. I'm almost sure it will work for Jab, too.

I had to make a .bat file. Does anyone think he'll have to do that?

Wow that made me feel surprisingly good lol. Probably is propaganda. I read it in a biography once... a shady one though, heh.

The majority of Iraq, the average Joes, like us. The people attacking us are the extremists. Lmfao... you mean Michael Moores' take on what's really going on? There is too much I can say, I'll just link you >Link< >Link<>Link< I can get you more, if you want. Do you think GW would get the vote or support if we went to war with Saudi Arabia and our gas prices sky rocketed? No! I do admit that in some aspects George Bush is being a politician, but that's what he is - a politician. There has been talk of taking action against North Korea. Saddam may have been tyrannical, but Kim is totally insane. He killed a man once for pushing the wrong button on the elevator - and he has nukes. Saddam wasn't crazy enough to use anything like that (if he had it) whereas Kim is. This topic is dear to me too. People think they are being educated by 'do!@#$%^&*entaries' such as Fahrenheit 9/11 - I think it's a good laugh to watch. My father got his Master's Degree in Middle Eastern relations to become a colonel - and if I could remember to tell you the facts that he's told me - you would support the same ideals that I do. Let the flaming continue !