Falcoknight

lol at !@#$%^&* pelican

Congrats, you just disproved an internet joke that no one took seriously anyway.

The government would never ban something it makes that much money off.. Which is why I don't get why they don't just legalize marijuana and tax the !@#$%^&* out of it.

http://a966.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/59/m_2159c3e86f67f85cb7146468f2c818bd.jpg I'm way too !@#$%^&* sexy for a spoiler box. And no, I'm not posting my facebook link. You people are only for me to acknowledge in the context of SS and this forum. As far as I'm concerned, none of you actually exist outside this forum.

This isn't ridiculously old or over-used past the point where it could possibly still be funny at all.

I didn't know we could change clan names =o

Doesn't matter how ugly your car is if it costs a million bucks.

Will we see the individual scores and such like the end of last round?

+1

Sounds eerily similar to a Mainer accent.

Or... ARE YOU?! \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

sig

I have a fat, Jewish man in my signature.

I think life in prison can easily be a worse punishment. Quick death, or living out your days becoming an animal and being butt raped. I think the murderers deserve the buttseckz.

Root, I'm pretty sure he meant 'give him life' as in a life sentence.

Actually, surprisingly JDS, you're pretty much right. Ecoterrorism was a concept basically made up the U.S. government to be a way to kill the environmentalist movement. They use the label of ecoterrorism to get outrageous charges against anyone who commits a crime in the name of the environment. For example, one guy who torched 3 brand new pickup trucks, environmentalist, first time offender, but his actions, because he was doing it for the environment and protesting gas guzzling vehicles, led to him getting 23 years in jail, even though no person was harmed or put in danger. Another person sets 30 forest fires so they can get overtime fighting the fires they set, putting in danger the lives of dozens of firefighters and anyone who lived in the area, and what do they get? 3 years.

i have a handsfree bluetooth set I have a penis.

Hey, goofy.

This thread is still going? Am I still the sexiest one to have put my picture up, or has Losa posted n00dz yet?

Well the controversy arises over whether or not the way their actions are dealt with is fair in any way. One point to make is that the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front are both considered terrorist groups by the FBI, and are frequently referred to as being the biggest domestic threat facing America. Yet no one has ever died as a result of an "act of ecoterrorism" so how come "ecoterrorists" get multiple life sentences for committing crimes that only damage property and often don't actually endanger the life of any person at all, along with being labeled terrorists or members of terrorist organizations? And why are those labels thrown onto ALF and ELF but not attached to White Supremacist groups, or radical anti-abortion groups, both of whom have actually killed people? No one disagrees that they are radicals (correction, no one sane) but many believe the government is taking it too far by condemning them as terrorists, handing out over the top penalties, and in some states pushing legislature that will actually make the death penalty a viable punishment for an act of ecoterrorism (again, note that no one has ever been killed in any of these acts of "terrorism"). James Jarboe, the chief of the FBI's counterterrorism division, defined ecoterrorism as "the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature against innocent victims or property by an environmentally-oriented, sub national group for environmental-political reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature.” These definitions of terrorism open the door to violent acts against property only being defined as acts of terrorism, and go against the accepted definition promoted by the International Policy Ins!@#$%^&*ute for Counter-Terrorism, which states that “the targets of terrorism are civilians” and stresses the fact that the acts are usually purposely directed against civilians.

Lawl at you.

Basically it's committing acts of terrorism in the name of saving the environment.

Wait.. since when is it bad to wear shorts in the cold. As a matter of fact I wore shirts and a t-shirt today.. It wasn't too cold. About 34 F.

First snowed about two weeks ago up here.

Discuss your views on it. Is it bad enough to be labelled terrorism as the FBI has, or is it simply like any other belief where there a few radicals and the entire situation is blown out of proportion? Any other opinions and information are welcome. I personally think they're a bunch of bat!@#$%^&* crazy hippies, but I've got about 130 pages of articles, speeches, etc. to read through right now, so I'll post more in-depth after that. I love late nights spent doing research -_-