2:ER>Greased> she's my perfect woman of the week 2:ER>Greased> cuz shes almost as smart as me 2:Vile Requiem> I'm smarter then you greasy, want to !@#$%^&* me? 2:WileE> my remote is smarter than reasy 2:ER>Greased> let me qualify my last statelemt, she's smarter than me... and shes HOT 2:ER>Greased> note the "SHE"s about 2 minutes later.... 2:Vile Requiem> Is there a problem with being gay? 2:ER>Greased> yes 2:TiQ> no 2:ER>Greased> yes 2:nahtaiveL gniK> everyone once and a while 2:TiQ> i will tolerate it vile. 2:TiQ> i won't shun you 2:Vile Requiem> sounds like you're raping tiq 2:Vile Requiem> yes...NO...yes...NO 2:WileE> it isnt rape if Tiq likes it 2:TiQ> or if he does not know about it 2:Vile Requiem> It's kinda hard to not know that something is repeatidly thrusted up your !@#$%^&* 2:TiQ> so i wouldn't know. right now, i am sitting on a swivel chair 2:TiQ> and i don't think my swivel chair is sodomizing me 2:Vile Requiem> yes...yes it is 2:TiQ> prove it 2:WileE> can you prove it is not 2:TiQ> yes. 2:WileE> how? 2:Vile Requiem> It's very hard to prove a negative 2:Vile Requiem> thus the burden of proof is on the prosceution 2:WileE> then disprove a positive 2:TiQ> no it isn't. because either my swivel chair is sodomizing me, or it isn't. and it is not. if it was, then...well, i guess i would have a problem *Edited out the pub chat stuff