A Soldier

I agree that Saddam was an evil man and had to be taken out of power. Although, when I turn on the TV and see that innocent Iraqis have been tortured by US soldiers, who are here to liberate the people, there is a problem. If that's what you call a step up, I totally disagree. Tortures are violations of human rights.

yay for reagan

Ironically, I've seen some reports on TV a few months ago of people giving their opinion about the occupation. One of them said something like this (refering to arrests made by the army - and which you won't see on CNN): Guy: "With Saddam, at least he knocked on the door before taking away our family members. Now with the Americans, they don't even knock. They storm our houses at night and take them out to places we don't even know. I think that's a complete lack of respect." (saw @ Radio-Canada) That last sentence kind of made me smile, although the situation isn't funny at all. Ever since the coalition stepped in Iraq, they arrested whoever they want for any reason. Of course, they would say they're linked to either Saddam or terrorists, but late reports show us most of them had nothing to do with it. My question is this: how are they more free now? I might even add the tortures US military used on prisonners in prisons like Abu Ghraib. Please don't say they only individuals were the problem, as people like Rumsfeld or chiefs at the US defense department were linked to the scandal. http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/08/1702022.php

Sigh... this article was made to show how much the world disagrees with Bush's overall decisions... of course they don't vote.

kinda ironic coming from you.

uhh, if you mean the poll results, they are on the first post

A new poll in 35 countries suggests that people around the world would prefer Democratic challenger John Kerry as US president over George W Bush. Full article @ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3640754.stm Thoughts?

Hey, dont get me wrong here. I condemn the attacks of September 11; where does it say I find it funny? But come on, saying there is terrorism because of the Crusades..? No serious historian or political analyst would ever come up with something like that...

my controls change email adress ?

hahahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WAHAHAHAHAHAH! <_< *chokes* You made my day

Take his stance on religion for exemple or how he dealt with the economy (favoring the richs) or with the environnement what he thinks of steam (sp?) cells amendment on gay marriages etc.. etc.. (I don't know if there is some place that lists all of what he was for/against during his 4 years, but it would help) According to the politcal comp!@#$%^&* analysis, he's the furthest one on the right http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalc...tionalchart.jpg

Are you saying Bush is not a right-wing radical?

So... you !@#$%^&*ociate terrorism with Islam?

I watched the republican convention yesterday and something funny happened. During Bush's speech, cameras were filming people's reactions. At some point, they decided to make a close up of where Bush senior, his wife and the person sitting next her (I can't remember who she was) were. Anyways, Bush's wife leaned over that woman and told her something, which she reacted like she was saying "yeah -*BAD WORD*-, is it over yet?". saw at 22:58 on CBS news

merci. Je regarderai ça quand j'aurais fini mon CEGEP aujourd'hui

Yeah please

...but people kill people with.. guns?

Or how about compare him with republicans instead? To me, you are comparing apples with oranges. Arnold vs Ashcroft for exemple. Like Monte said, and I agree with him:

:steve: :frusciante: I think theses two smilies should be removed too, since no one really use them.

Thanks. Won't it scare rich investors away from your country?

hahahahahaha I have a question though: I saw in the papers today that Kerry said he would reduce taxes I think by 98% for the lest wealthy people and increase thoses of the wealthiers... how does he plan to do that?

http://nextl3vel.net/forum/html/emoticons/thumbs-up.gif ^not bad either edit: umm.. not that good after all

Except that the purpose of a gun is to injure someone or terminate lives.

ROFL.

If you followed the whole story, what are your opinions on it? For or against Chavez? I'm glad he stays, for my part.