A Soldier

omfg.... I'll comment once I get back

OH PLEASE! And what the -*BAD WORD*- did Canada do to deserve that uh? ????????????? So the website that shows Canada donates a good portion of it's GDP is an illusion? Come on aileron, you know better than that. The point is, you can't compare in terms of money since we don't have the same economy, unless you like comparing oranges with bananas.

Hypocrite.

Such a predictable answer. Thanks for giving me the last word.

I never said the US don't send aid. In terms of economic aid per GDP, Canada donates more though. Your ratio is bull. http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/eco_eco_aid_don_gdp Again, I seem to know so little about my country. So why don't you help me out and tell me what's wrong with it? .....??? Well, at least, being peaceful sure does help eh? So what else prevents my country from being attacked? I've posted links to prove my points, it's your turn now. If you have time to post on a forum, you certainly must have some left to give me credible arguments. Why don't you start by showing me that [Compared to the US, Canada] has equally killed and bombed in defense of its own agenda.

And I am not sure what you are trying to prove... Canada is a peaceful country, renowned for it's diplomacy, peacekeeping efforts and the aid it provides for countries in the need of it. I'm pretty sure we can both agree on that. Now, you claim it has blood on its hand because we were involved in Kosovo, Cambodia, etc., you name it by sending troops to keep peace and order and giving humanitarian aid? I don't see how I am hiding history. Perhaps you could enlighten me?

"Insults: arguments employed by those who are in the wrong." - Jacques Rousseau

Uh... 1. Taken from NATO's FAQ: Q: What does NATO do? A: The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) is an alliance of 26 countries from North America and Europe committed to fulfilling the goals of the North Atlantic Treaty signed on 4 April 1949. In accordance with the Treaty, the fundamental role of NATO is to safeguard the freedom and security of its member countries by political and military means. NATO is playing an increasingly important role in crisis management and peacekeeping I don't even see why you mentionned NATO... :/ 2. ..? 3. Was there not a resolution proposed and accepted by the security council for Gulf War? Isn't Canada a member of the UN? ... 4. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/kosovo.html http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/asia/country/...05-01-03-en.asp Do you need more links? Now, I will ask you the same question again: ever wondered why Canada is never threatened (as far as I'm concerned) by foreign terrorist organisations..? Ridiculous statement.

Actually they have. I wasn't alive during the time however (I think). I think they had a bout of bombings in the 70's (???) Monte chime in, im sure you know the dates. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think you are refering to the FLQ (Front de libération du Québec), a terrorist organisation who kidnapped a diplomat and a minister because they wanted Quebec to obtain independance from Canada. What I don't get though is Rec's comment. Understand what? Did you ever ask yourself why Canada never (as far as I'm concerned) got threatened by foreign terrorist organisations?

But then, out of curiosity, is that not what you want?

ok my bad here. I meant what media(s) and why/how?

What do you mean by biaised, seriously? Personnally, I believe I could say the same thing about american medias. Take Fox for exemple. The few times I had the chance to watch it while I was in New York last summer gave me an idea on the channel's objectivity - poor. :/ Perhaps Europe didn't think Saddam Hussein presented a direct threat to their region..? I think monte posted a link of it before about how Saddam's regime did not pose a threat to his neighbors. How could he strike on Europe?

Sigh. Being an american citizen, the website wasn't even aimed at you, yet you had to step in to insult me while not even getting the point of the poll: people disagree with american foreign policies, the main reason why they prefer Kerry over Bush.

Funny how you are easily offuscated by a website offfff course citizens from around the world should not vote in the US elections, but the point of the website was to gather opinions from people that do no live in the US to see, if they were americans, who they'd vote for. Bush isn't even listed in the top 3

A website I saw on an other forum http://www.usworldvote.org

Though they were speaking of Baraka Obama (not sure if spelt correctly) - Illinois. I'm not sure Rice would make a good candidate for presidency :/

SP2 is buggy as -*BAD WORD*-

I wish I could tell you more but that's classified info:/

You know nothing fool! Never heard of our deadly grizzly bears that kill anything that moves?? Cross the border man, and you'll know what it feels to live in winter 24/7 I'll make you visit my igloo some day.

Your army can't stand canadian winters

Are you blaming the terrorist attacks because of foreign countries..?

http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/mam/ WAHAHAHAHA

lol, thanks. I'll stick to my old one though

No... nobody wants to live in the illusion that everything is alright. People want to know why they are daily terrorists act on the coalition. Or why is there so much violence in Iraq caused by angry citizens? Why does the world believe you are wrong? heh. The world needs the US and the US needs the world. So nope

I never thought you'd be dumb enough to say that. When the army crashes into your house, taking away your family members you don't say "it's a lack of respect" (even if it is); it's worse than that. Next time you want to make a personnal attack against me, keep it to yourself. Let me simply add this. You don't justify illegal actions by saying former ruler was a tyrant and did worse.