P Nut

Why? I understood when my posts were deleted; that is fine. Although, now I am seeing legitimate posts disappearing and an entire thread locked. Whose betterment is this for?

Show me logs where I said anything like that. Oh, Lets blatantly ignore what Spider has said in response and stick to it being a scam, again, Ponzi Scheme. I mean, lets first ignore the fact that Spidernl is jrmod. Let's also ignore the fact that this isn't the first time he's made a bot and those previous bots didn't turn out to be scambots. Let's also ignore Spidernl's character. Ok, Maybe he could be scamming us, if we ignore all that.On the other hand, how about we don't ignore it and look at the facts head on. 1. I seriously doubt that any of the higher-ups would look all that kindly at Spidernl scamming the players of HS. His position is one of authority and that means that he must set an example for others, not just in chat, but in his actions while logged into HS. Willfully disregarding his position would cost him his jrmod status and quickly make him as popular as PC. (I wouldn't even wish that on you P Nut.) 2. His other bots. Out of the time I've spent in HS, and the conversations I've had with him about bots, I've yet to see anything that actually comes close to being a scam bot. It makes no sense, why keep developing bots for use in HS if you're gonna scam your potential users? 3. I've had the pleasure of getting to know Spidernl, and while he can be a bit of an ass, which same could be said of anyone, doubly so of me, I just don't see it in him to spend all this time developing a bot, putting his own money into it, just for the express purpose of a Ponzi scheme. Much less any other bot. If I even began to think that my HS funds were not safe in his hands (Or his bots hands) I wouldn't use the service, at all. It'd be much easier, and safer for me to create an alias and to just put money on that account. I'm sorry, I just don't see it possible. Let's blatantly ignore me saying it's not a scam too. Maybe then you'll have something to argue about. Yes. Keep replying, though. I love watching you fall on your face. It's getting funnier and funnier.

Vodka I can tell by the pixels.

Oh god, I lol'd hard. You either haven't read a single thing I have said or have zero comprehension skills. The title of the thread is UB-HyperBank. I was expressing my concerns of how it operated. I don't need to have a stake in the bot to be concerned about it or the people that use it. Obviously, I do care what happens to everyones' money. Your opinion is no greater than mine. It is equal. We are both players of this game and we both have opposing views. That does not make one worth more than the other. I never once said, "I told you so" because I never once expressed my thoughts on the bot before this thread. (Not that it matters anyway; the incident had nothing to do with what I was concerned about) This thread seemed like the appropriate place to have a healthy discussion about the bot. I also never said that this bot was a scam. However, now that Spider has cleared a few things up, I no longer have any concern. He assured me that interest would not be distributed once the donations are depleted. But none of that matters to you, does it? You aren't here to talk about the bot, the way it's operated, or the incident with Unix. Clearly you are here to talk about me.

You aren't even making any points. You just strut in here telling people their opinion means nothing. Not even giving any valid reasons why, either. You're just talking hot air. If anything, I would say your opinion is invalid because you did have money invested in the bot. That's what we call conflict of interest.

You point is invalid until you show me why I should invest in this bot if I was wholly against it.

cool logic bro Incorrect. The bot had about 2m in capital. If everyone withdrew only the original donators would have lost money. And since they weren't expecting it back, ever, it is hardly a loss.

use

Think about what you just said. He should think about what he's doing although he didn't know about it? Under any other circumstance a harmless arena message prank is harmless. You edited your previous post after I had posted. Unintentionally, I assume. You never spoke of this before, it is suspiciously sudden.

People are expecting a return of interest. If they receive more money than they put into it, it is a profit. You are promising them .5% weekly profit.

Every person that has money in the bot is an investor. The original donators only pooled in capital to get the ball rolling. From here on out I will cease to use the word "scheme" to avoid its negative connotation. However, the mechanism is still Ponzious.

I'm not saying you are intentionally scamming people. The current arrangement to yield interest is a clear definition of a Ponzi scheme. Now, I understand your ultimate goal is to have a loan system. I, however, do not see that ever being possible without the bot being assisted by staff power. Since I do not see or sense any concerted effort in this direction, I can only assess the bot for what it is currently. Ponzious.

<_<

I consider boxduel a large success.

So you're going to hold 10m of everyone's money hostage because of your design choice? Don't make innocent players responsible for this. The only logical move to do now is return everyone's money without interest and shut down the bot. The entire concept behind this bot is a Ponzi scheme and would have been bound to fail sooner or later. It is better this incident happened before the system collapsed, possibly scamming the majority of people that used it. Also, a harmless arena message is hardly abuse, Dav. Masaru knows nothing about bots, he should not be held accountable by any means.

I watch Castle solely for Nathan Fillion

wah woh trolls trolling trolls

I would not recommend any of these builds.

Degenerates, the lot of you.

wat Also, sign me up.

Bases are broken. TKing doesn't make a strategy any less effective. If anything, it only proves how effective it really is at utterly destroying people. I would argue that the rushers are the ones being ineffective. In these tight corridors, concentrated gun lines make it difficult for any rusher to get anything done. They end up just being cannon fodder, for the enemy team and their own. An important dynamic to flagging was removed when the old bases were uploaded. Will it be missed? Some people will, some people won't. Either way, these bases were not designed for our current environment. The balance between offense and defense diminishes with our higher populations and present item set. From every aspect, these bases do not belong in the map.

http://imgur.com/LIEh4.jpg

Oi, this guy just confessed to flagtrading. Degrant

cry

Except I only rush in Warbird.