Is that a statement subtly hinting that mods have never abused before? Methinks doc doesn't watch his zone carefully. ... What counts as corruption to you, doc? From what i've seen, quite a few mods would be OUT if it's the definition of corruption we're going for. And as for the Gar vs Arnk thing. I agree with Gar on this Arnk. You DO act like everytime someone logs in and says "wtf nerf" that it is an aimed directly at you. I also agree that mods and devs represent their zone and should remain conducted in normal behavior.I agree with arnk however, if you are being explicity rude to a mod/dev. Chances are they won't be golden to you. It's reciprocity and remains the number one golden rule in the world. Arnk, You do not have to act like a little three year old towards everyone just because you get all pissy about a post or sentence they write. Taken back to the arguement we had over the forums. When it ended you kept trying to get it to come back again. That showed serious insecurity and the immaturity not usually associated with moderators and developers, especially of a zone that is essentually unique and needs people to come and see it. Now, I am not implying that you are immature or insecure, just a moment of it. I actually have quite a bit of respect for what you do for this zone and the time you put into it. I would just like to point out that you CAN act like a comment posted is aimed directly at you and you DO tend to warp it into a huge arguement. Russky, quiting proves nothing, in my opinion, if you wanted to spite someone. Stay online and just ignore them. You give them to much satisfaction in knowing they made you quit.