lol dude, you got SimpleCDN to write on your post. My favorite part is when someone tried saying the person writing the article and someone replying as SimpleCDN were the same person: "Don't know who BlueToast is - and I am sure Slashdot can confirm this for you that it isn't us. I've been up for about 72 hours straight helping customers move to CloudFront and MaxCDN, and just happened to refresh /. and saw this post. How do you say that we "over use" bandwidth? We purchase dedicated servers from a company that provides 100TBs of bandwidth with each server, and the majority of our servers use MUCH LESS than 100TBs of bandwidth. This is the service that has been sold to us, so how are we "over using" bandwidth? Again UK2 did confirm that their business model fully supports offering 100TBs of bandwidth with each server. And again, we're using much less. If they can't provide this service, then why are they offering it? Why did they terminate SimpleCDN, but continue to offer the service to others, knowing they can't provide it? Why did UK2 say the decision was "out of their hands"? Did SoftLayer force them to shutdown SimpleCDN? But then why SimpleCDN? Why not all of their customers doing 100TBs on their servers? So many questions, and so far no answers from the "giants". Thanks, John SimpleCDN Support" Do have to admit though, he does sound like you.