Aceflyer

I agree with Audry.

the first version I had of that about 6 years ago blocked an essential process and caused excessive memory useage till my PC BSOD'd. I guess it has improved since then though Yep, the version I have allows one to set permissions for each program. Works pretty well for me...

Thank you for letting us know.

Can you pm me his contact info, everything I have is out of date and I havent seen him on ss in ages. He's been on SS recently. ?find Ghost Ship

I use the McAfee Security Suite. It's a classic but a goodie.

What Kn|ght said.

You finding this chain of events funny makes it that much more irritating for me. To clarify, I find Slicer's cartoon depiction funny. I don't find the actual events funny, at all.

Since you've already submitted a netban dispute ticket, the best thing to do is to simply wait for a response. There is a delay with processing netban disputes atm, as per this thread.

epic lulz I wub dis!

I'd recommend submitting a netban dispute ticket.

May be more effective to talk to people via IM or in-game. Just a suggestion.

It's the principle of the matter. cReEmY, for example, is still able to play in Continuum even though he is netbanned, but his netban still stands. That's actually all I want - for him to leave me alone. I have L Y N X on my ignore.txt - and have had him there for some time now. The ignore.txt did work as it was supposed to for a while. This whole thing started because somehow he was recently able to get around my ignore.txt.

I can't believe this nonsense. In the first place this thread shouldn't even be here. SSC netban disputes are supposed to occur via a netban dispute ticket. In any case, I will attempt to illustrate some of the facts surrounding this situation. If you are ignored, I'm not supposed to be able to see messages from your alias. The fact that you were on my ignore.txt, that you knew you were on my ignore.txt, and yet were able to force me to see your messages - against my will - indicates a willful attempt at evading my ignore. How am I being a newb exactly? When players put someone on ignore.txt they expect that they will not have to see any further messages on Continuum from said ignored person. Cross-zone evasion of a zone sysop's ignore, with accompanied 'wisecracking' (which I deem har!@#$%^&*ment, due to the evasion of ignore), which continues after a clear warning to stop, is a netbannable offense. I knew the above 'hacking comments' were jokes. Did I ever indicate that I believed that bull? I never accused L Y N X of "pm spamming." I did not tell Nighthawk what to put in the ban comment. The relevant excerpts from logs: That's all. As you can see I represented the situation accurately. Nowhere did I state that L Y N X was har!@#$%^&*ing me via cross-zone PMs. Generally netbans are made without first checking with a biller op. Or do you seriously believe BlueGoku/Mackieman get bothered every single time a netban is being made? And didn't you just admit to evading my ignore? You asked me if you were still on my ignore. You should not have been able to ask me that, since you were, in fact, still on my ignore. Generally netbans are made without first checking with a biller op. Or do you seriously believe BlueGoku/Mackieman get bothered every single time a cross-zone spamming netban is being made? Furthermore you weren't 'informed' of anything. You said (in a post you made on the SSC Forum) that that was how you were doing it. Flaming isn't the issue. Cross-zone evasion of ignore is the issue.

Very nice.

I don't think he ever handed the server over.

I am with Hakaku. ASSS offers much potential - much potential for good, and much potential for stirring up lots of problems for the inexperienced user.

More SSC hosts are always good to have, in my humble opinion. Before SSCW, zones looking for SSC hosts were pretty much limited to SSCC and SSCI.

Yes, what Stukie said.

It's rather hard to be sure of hitting someone only in the knees, which comprise, after all, a relatively small area.

What Samapico said. Awesome work, thanks Cerium!

What cReEmY said. There are no indications whatsoever that Chambahs has stolen, or has attempted to steal, credit from other players.

Just out of curiosity, why would you trust Google with personally identifying information more than Viacom? I too agree that it would be best if Google were able to anonymize the logs before handing them over to Viacom. The fewer the people who have access to sensitive information, the more secure that information generally stays.

My god. This is rather ridiculous. On the other hand, I'm not so concerned over the alleged privacy violations; it's highly unlikely that Viacom would use any personally identifying information it may obtain in any manner that would noticeably affect the lives of the average YouTube user. If Viacom is foolish enough to intrude on the lives of private YouTube users, there's going to be a truly massive public backlash against Viacom.