1587200

The zones can ban whoever they want. Who are you to tell them how to run their zone?

function

Dude, he was supporting you and you come out and attack him? I think you're some punk !@#$%^&* kid who can't use proper punctuation and who needs to try and attack others online to make yourself feel better about being a lowly !@#$%^&* who has nothing to show for himself in life. I also think you need to read the previous threads you've created, and the responces in them. You were justly banned, end of discussion. The evidence was presented, the desision was made. Starting topics on this forum or anywhere else isn't going to get you any sympathy from us, as we really don't care about your pathetic attempt at trying to feel important. I may not agree a lot with MTN, but he was justified in his banning. Your repsonce was to come on here and !@#$%^&* and cry like a kid with a skinned knee, then you start taking shots at Shock for supporting you? You're way out of your leauge pal. Go find another game to play, because posting and !@#$%^&*ing here aren't going to get you anywhere except banned from the forums as well. Punk !@#$%^&* little 13 year old !@#$%^&* who thinks he knows about world politics because of what his parents have told him. Go die in a fire you !@#$%^&*.

Up top, along the navigation bar, under "Game Websites"

Another reason to fire mackie.

rawr

pee

It's still there, near the bottom.

What if God isn't the answer to why, but how?

Darkwing Duck anyone?

It's true, check out http://www-move.info/1861-news.html and do a search for my name. A quote that was posted on the quotes page ended up there for some reason. Kinda nifty. It's amazing what you find with google.

The council has no right to do anything anymore after the way the majority of it's members have ruined this game. Scroll up and read my posts.

Wow. Someone call the Guinness Book of World Records!

Thunder Cats Voltron 'nuff said. Those two shows own all.

Never eat a bannana then drink a beer, frickin nasty...carry on...

That's why you go to a wedding dude, to support the couple getting married.

Kinda, but I went out with her best friend instead..heh.

it sux Wow, you guys are great at adding relevent content to the topic. Sounds interesting, can't wait for it to be posted, even though I Have no idea who that guy is...

So a good friend of mine is getting married, problem is, she's marring a total !@#$%^&* bag. He used to be a friend of mine, but pulled some pretty dirty and low !@#$%^&* durring my best friend's wedding (most of which she doesn't know about, as far as I know), and frankly I'd be happy spending a few months in jail for assault just to beat him within an inch of his life. She doesn't know I think the world would be a better place without him in it, and she'll probably never know. Oh, he also thinks I still like him, mainly because I don't want to damage my friendship with his fiance. Anyway, do I go to the wedding in show of support to her and sit on the bride's side just to spite him, or do I just not go at all? Frankly, I don't agree with this marriage because I think she's too good for him, but she's also been a long time friend who's been more of an inspiration to me than 90% of the people I know. Also, the reservation says " ___ of 1 will be attending" which kind of seems insulting to me, even though I'm single. It almost says to me, "you're not good enough to get a date to come with you". I could be wrong though...I tend not to trust anyone these days. I've been back stabbed so many times that I barely trust my own mother, which is probably why I'm still single, but that's a whole 'nother can of worms we won't open right now.

Someone could get the encryption protocol, start programming cheats, infeltrate the biller, steal passwords, steal names, make themselves a god on the biller, and I'm sure there's more that I'm not thinking of right now.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19191611/ http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,280993,00.html In short, Bush wants to legalize all the current 12 million illegal border jumpers from Mexico, saying that legalizing them is the first step in enforcing our border. *read the articles for the full stories* Questions: 1) Would granting citizenship to 12 million illegal immigrants be the first step in securing our borders? Or is the USA sending a message saying, "Jump the border and hide from the government long enough, and they'll make you legal"? 2) Would legalizing 12 million illegals help, hurt or have no impact on the current US work force? Why? Personally...this is going to be such a huge issue at the next election it's not even funny. If Bush gets this bill passed, then the Republicans have 12 million more votes for the next election. As far as my questions... 1) No, the first step would be to send all 12 million of them back, and keep them out. Yes we are sending that message with this bill. We're also sending the message that votes are more important than our border and our current US population. At the risk of sounding like a bigot, I think we need to completely shut down our borders and take care of our own tired, hungry and hurting people before we start worrying about the rest of the world again. 2) Possibly hurt. We already pay for the benifits and taxes on the current illegals. The only adverse effect it would have on the work force is that minimum wage could be lowered, and there'd still be people willing to work for it. Your thoughs? I think Bush found an old stash of coke and started powdering his nose again. After this second term, I'm really pissed that I actually voted for this guy. Then again, the only other option was Kerry, so I went for the lesser of two evils.

What's the point in expressing yourself in different languages if no one can read your expressions and comprehend what you're trying to express? (How's that for a run-on sentence?!) And on your unrelated note. everything seems to be in working order using firefox. A few css errors, but nothing major.

The only reason I can think of is that he cares enough to not want the game and source to fall into the wrong hands. However, it also shows he doesn't care enough (or have enough time) to continue development. which is kind of a double negative, but whatever. I still think you guys should get someone new into the council. Promoting someone who already does nothing to do something more is kinda pointless (ie, Mackieman). Give the responsibilities to someone who actually gives a !@#$%^&* about this game, then something good might happen, not that anyone cares anyway (except the players, who have been crying for as long as I can remember for someone reliable to get in a position to help them). But as it stands now, those with power sit around and wait for someone to come along who's willing to pleasure them oraly, then, MABYE, something gets done, but who wants an !@#$%^&* kisser (SVS) running the show eh? Certainly not I.

How many people on this forum do you think can read that?