Tiq

There were two sources there...besides, it's not like 6'3 is short. This is one of those times where I just gotta say that you're wrong on this one. If you can present sources to the alternative, then go for it. But even if you google "Eric Snow height and weight" you find the result always being 6'3. Not a big deal, really. Just the point being that Eric Snow is decently tall, but not that tall.

-Sprays MTN with confetti and throws a pie at Vilebox-

Eric Snow Position Point guard Height 6 ft 3 in (1.91 m) Weight 205 lb (93 kg) Team Cleveland Cavaliers Nationality Flag of United States United States Born April 24, 1973 (1973-04-24) (age 34) Canton, Ohio College Michigan State Draft 2nd round, 43rd overall, 1995 Milwaukee Bucks Pro career 1995–present Former teams Seattle SuperSonics (1995–1998) Philadelphia 76ers (1998–2004) Awards 2005 National Basketball Players !@#$%^&*ociation Community Contribution Award 2005 J. Walker Kennedy Citizenship Award Courtesy of Wikipedia.com Born: Apr 24, 1973 Height: 6-3 / 1,91 Weight: 205 lbs. / 93,0 kg. College : Michigan State Years Pro: 11 Courtesy of NBA.com In conclusion, Eric Snow is 6'3

Fortunately for Jessica Alba, LOSA is not her target audience in that photo. Unless she is, in which case....MMMMMM EDIT: Eric Snow is 6'3, 205 pounds. Ideal for a pointguard. Shooting guards are usually made of more height and weight, unless they got the speed to cancel height and weight out.

He has also averaged for his career, over 10 rebounds a game and has shown himself a capable scorer when he gets the ball in his hands. A career fieldgoal percentage of 51% tells me that he is a capable offensive player, and can be relied upon to supplement the offense even if most of his energy is put forth towards defense. Don't knock Mutumbo, woman! The man's a beast, and was a huge part of the Phili trip to the finals. Now...let's get back to the women part of this thread

http://quotes.sscentral.com/index.php?1792 That one made me laugh for a bit

http://quotes.sscentral.com/index.php?1411

Now, everyone should be able to state their opinion about something like basketball without being mocked or insulted. If she were saying that in her opinion, the Holocaust never happened, then I would be right there with you guys. But...it's basketball. That's something that can be discussed without forming negative !@#$%^&*umptions or getting overly arrogant over it.

For me I see a connection between Jordan and championships. Those Bulls could not have won another championship without him. Proven in the mid-90s. As a matter of fact, who the best player is is debatable. In my opinion, Jordan is. And let's not forget, it was he who inspired this generation of great guards. Ask any one of them and they will cite him as a primary influence.

You can tell what type of game he is gonna have based on what types of shots he is taking. If he is driving the lane a lot, then he is gonna have a good night. If he's taking too many jump shots, then he will probably have an off night. I don't put much stock in these playoffs for the Nuggets since they still gotta work on the team chemistry and what not. People would be afraid to leave anybody capable of making a mid-range jumper open. Iverson is best when he attacks, not when he shoots. Back in Jordan's prime, he was unbeatable. In his prime against any of these guys, he would not be the same. There is a reason why Jordan is considered the best player of all time. There were plenty of dominant players during the Jordan era, but they could never beat him. The Malone-Stockton combo, probably the best duo in the history of the league, had two shots at him and faltered. No team in the east had a shot against Jordans' Bulls except maybe the 1997 Knicks. There was Hakeem, Reggie, David Robinson, Charles Barkley, etc. There were plenty of greats during the Jordan era. Let's not forget about Shaq. Shaquille O'Neal only won a championship after Jordan was out of his prime. Carter is too inconsistent in the playoffs to be considered a great. He's real good, but not great. Nash and Amare compliment eachother. Let's face it, the casual basketball fan who just watched games every couple nights new little of Amare until he started racking up 25 a game cuz of Nash. Kobe in his prime could arguably match up well against Jordan in his prime, but Kobe has needed a big man to help him to the finals. Jordan had mediocre to decent big men to help, but he never had a Shaquille O'Neal. T-Mac hasn't been able to get past the first round WITH a great big man, and he had one of his best years this year. I ain't knocking any of these players. Personally, my favorite player ever is Tracy McGrady. But Jordan is the best of all time. Case in point: the Bulls were in the playoffs both years he was gone in the mid-90s, but they were never able to reach the level they were at when Jordan was with them. That is not to say Jordan did it all by himself. He had the perfect role players, and of course, Scotty Pippen. Iverson is a great player, but he is by no means better than Jordan. I would even argue that he is not in the top 10 greatest players of all time. If he was unstoppable, then he would not need a good supporting cast to help carry him. I put NO stock in the all-star games. Those count for nothing. Jordan won a couple MVP as an all-star I think, but they don't count for much. The fact of the matter is, a great player is a player who can adapt to his situation and create something great out of it. That takes time of course. The Melo-Iverson combo could be dangerous, but they have a lot to work on. On a side-note: the pics are bangin'

my ball got stuck neat tho

I enjoy rootbear's photos almost as much as I enjoy Synister's display picture with the penguins.

17th is a part of subspace.

hehehe...ewwwwww

Chambahs has nice chesticles then. EDIT: Finally someone posts pics of hot women. rootbear's a hero.

OMG. You crucify me for saying the place is dead, and here you are typing 17th's eulogy, or as Zoolander would put it "you-googily". Forshame. 17th is dead for now. It could conceivably make a comeback, though. Subspace is not dead yet. Plenty of fun to be had yet.

SPITTIN' HOT FIRE.

I don't think you are appreciating the amount of physical activity it takes to walk into a home and steal jewelry, Dav. Maybe he was on the verge of cramping up. That sofa must have looked mighty inviting. Or maybe he was planning to get a quick !@#$%^&* in, and fell asleep on the job. Such things happen if you get lost in your imaginations. "Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. "

I hope they keep making people like him. They make life funny.

Oh man. That's hilarious.

...I don't follow...

8:Vile Requiem> for a flow, if the reynolds number is < 2100, the flow is laminar 8:Emblazon> mm.. flow.. 8:Vile Requiem> 2100 < Re < 4000 it's transitional 8:Vile Requiem> and > 4000 it's turbulant 8:TiQ> you lost me at "for a flow", vilebox 8:Emblazon> wtf are you rambling about.. 8:Vile Requiem> fluid dynamics 8:TiQ> snoogasm, aren't you busy pleasuring telson? 8:Telson> so X? get that sex change yet? 8:Emblazon> he climaxed, its over 8:Vile Requiem> for a laminar flow, you can use the pouiselle's equation to find the flow rate 8:Telson> dude, snoo that was just the warmup sex 8:TiQ> enough vilebox. it is clear that you know things 8:Emblazon> what about vaginal flow vilebox 8:TiQ> lol