JoWie

http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/5/d/5de47_ORIG-cool_story_bro_gif.gif

Only 2 of those in C&C are mine. Which are merely there because C&C has SSC, hyperspace crashes to much and I can relax the flood filters. One of them is a SSC Chat game, the other is a relay bot between subspace ?chat and an irc server. All the others I do not even know why they are there (they are chatnet).

That is not very hard. The hard part is having the bot fly to the optimal position.

why not? is it because of a personal issue with smong, because you dont like the way its coded, or because of its system resource usage? I think the most likely reason Smong would release a closed source module is that it has a backdoor in it. He's consistently refused to give me a copy of the source, so I've given up trying. Without source, I'm also unable to improve it to support bursts, repels, decoys, bricks, etc. Better question is why would *anyone* use it? Want to have it?

I have a few, this is from 2005

The algorithm would not have changed a lot, if at all, between continuum versions. Maybe even between the subspace and continuum client. The old versions of continuum were easy to unpack, maybe one could start there.

I think i posted about it a long while back but i do not remember where, I think i even posted an alternate solution with some code. I just remembered it because I still have nav.js adblocked, when I did that ssforum.net loaded a lot smoother The issue was/is using document.write to output s in a script that is loaded in the . Half the elements in the end up in the

You do not have health insurance or something?

Looks good, but the last version broke the DOM and affected page loading. Does that still happen?

Discretion should be rewritten in XUL and Javascript

.SubChat2FE_1.0.zip

They do that because they are assholes, not because they have testosterone. Vitamin T is one little variable in that behavior. Divorces occur because people get married for the wrong reasons and monogamy is against instinct (note that there is a lot of debate about human instinct and polygamy and this may not be true). For me personally, marriage is not even important or necessary. If marriage would make a huge difference, something is fundamentally wrong in your relationship. ----------------- You should also look at the opposite point of view, a non scientific book I really liked is http://www.amazon.com/Atomic-Dog-Testosterone-Principles/dp/0977306313

Never said it was a result of castration

Do remember that castration BEFORE and AFTER puberty have two different sets of results. Those studies apply to both, they are about low test, a complete lack of it would worsen the symptoms. If you are going to do this, why not take some female steroids like estrogens and go shemale? As I stated before (or I think I did), I am not a homosexual (and strictly will not go that route). I'm straight, but I think the human race is disgusting. I do not believe that homosexuality is right or correct in anyway. However, I believe that castration (if within good reason) is okay because it isn't like eunuchs were ever questionable (in fact, wasn't Daniel from the Bible a eunuch or something? Or maybe that was someone else in the Bible). Setting aside all Christian beliefs, I still would believe that man was never meant for man, nor woman for woman, but was meant as man for woman. The biological makeup of both genders clearly indicate both were meant for each other, as they have the correct anatomy to match together. So in my case, if "not this," then "neither." You do not have to be homosexual for that.

Do remember that castration BEFORE and AFTER puberty have two different sets of results. Those studies apply to both, they are about low test, a complete lack of it would worsen the symptoms. If you are going to do this, why not take some female steroids like estrogens and go shemale?

Although there is no difference in life expectancy (however some diseases will occur less and some will occur more, this will depend greatly on your genes), it has a huge effect on your appearance in a negative way. Also, slight weakening in physical strength is an understatement, you will become weaker then most untrained females. Also note that low testosterone causes depression, increased aggression, weaker bones, decreased energy and motivation. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8885586 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20524974 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20153946 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?Db=pubmed&term=hypogonadism http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?Db=pubmed&term=low%20testosterone

Since every position packet has a c2slatency field, this could be a factor in the (inter|extra)polation as well. You could set up a simple experiment in ASSS, where you have 3 players and 2 of them see very different c2slatency for the third player (game.h: A_PPK EditIndividualPPK). I actually want to test this myself but I do not have the time this week.

You should try some nice tools in firefox like venkman and firebug, etc. If you want easy internet explorer support, use an abstraction layer like jquery. I have a LOT more trouble debugging things in flash then in javascript, although I do not support internet explorer in my applications. For chat only stuff, it wouldn't be that hard to add support for XMLHTTPRequest / WebSockets to that chatnet bouncer in perl I made. Only downside is that it would be one script per user. Plus point would be support for things like the iPhone. The nature of the always online bouncer could also be great for when you have bad connectivity, like 3g in a subway. If you want any user to login, you must either accept everyone coming from the same IP and the server admin being able to see your password, or using something else that does not work natively in browsers. Another option would be an ASSS module that implements WebSockets. But a full playing client without some sort of browser plugin (flash, java, etc) is not really doable yet. While modern browsers have support for bi-directional TCP sockets, there is no UDP. For most people the latency would be to big.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p99a6K81zqM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtTvJVmXneI?rel=0&hd=1&fs=0&showinfo=0

Beyond interface changes, some stuff that I find interesting (not all of them are in the first beta): SCP (HTTP header which tells from what domains you may load specific content (images, script, flash, etc) to prevent XSS) Account Manager (better integration with pages and the password manger, page delivers own rules) A lot of performance optimizations in the javascript engine, not all of them in beta 1 CSS3 Transitions CSS3 -moz-any (i wish this was supported a lot sooner, would have saved me a ton of code) WebGL(OpenGL) WebM video format Direct2D for windows vista etc WebSockets HTML 5 forms HTML 5 SVG & MathML lazy frame construction (changes to the DOM are delayed until they are actually needed, major speed improvement in my own applications) CSS3 calc: width: calc(50% + 5px); -moz-image-rect, great for having all your interface components in one image. File API url (unique identifier to preview images that are about to upload) ForceTLS (noscript already had it) I personally noticed a huge performance increase in beta 1 in our very heavy web application.

a drama filter

My e-penis is this big: =================================================================================================>

2 shemales 1 suction cup?