I have no idea where to start.each of your post i could write a 4page paper on how far you have ur head up ur !@#$%^&* ,soo ill just mention this one post you said "but woodstock was not singularly important to the music industry, and there are many other more noteworthy events that are far more deserving of a museum than woodstock." ...It is widely regarded as one of the greatest concerts in music history and was listed on Rolling Stone's 50 Moments That Changed the History of Rock and Roll..whats that History..?omg you said ..woodstock was like anything other concert.. Only 500,000 came to watch ..thats verrrrrry far from "any other concert" you said "it was started to simply make money" your kinda right about that ,but for get to say that it became a free festival after it became obvious that the concert was drawing hundreds of thousands more people than the organizers had prepared for. you all so said that the line up was crap? ...ill mention a FEW .Grateful Dead. Creedence Clearwater Revival (ccr) .Janis Joplin .The who.Jefferson Airplane .Blood, Sweat & Tears .Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.Santana.Jimi Hendrix. Led Zeppelin was asked to perform, their manager said, "We were asked to do Woodstock and Atlantic were very keen, and so was our US promoter, Frank Barcelona. I said no because at Woodstock we'd have just been another band on the bill." the only other bands that canceled worth mentioning is The doors and Bob Dylan.. as u can see the bands that played out weight the bands who didn't by far.