adi

There is not a paucity of lancs, just a lack of interest in anchoring. Also, l-f-s was abused; I don't think re-introducing it would be a good idea.

Godmode would be too powerful, and would cause a disorganized team to rq and an organized team to brickspam. Either way it's not going to be any fun for the person who has shell. Hijack: It would be nice to have multiple ways to complete a shell, like a flag game win subtracting 5 kills, a loss subtracting 4 etc.

Sign me up. Ad chaining is the best part of HS, it involves strategery, teamwork, and coordination. At least 3 lancasters should be allowed. also: it's my !%#@$ name. Unrelated: http://imgur.com/lHSFQl.jpg

Cya in nov

Prop P: Allow a subarena or maybe just an event where a freq captain (voted by other players?) can select 7 teammates to flag with. Everyone else who joins the arena will be assigned to the other team. This would not necessarily break down into organized 8 player priv vs 20 player unorganized rabble since all players that join apart from the 8 player priv will be assigned to the same team and so can stack with whoever they like.

It's so-so.

this is relevant

In case you can't read: August 24, 2009 I like Cheese's suggestion, but I would be happy with almost any fix.

If you're going to have a video as "evidence of skill" or proof... it makes no sense to cut parts of it. btw thanks, D1, I never knew that.

He's switched to zephyr and now speed jav. He's not a bad duelist* Either way, he is entitled to his own opinion. *compared to HS population. Don't bring up arbitrary elite standards from 2001. They aren't relevant right now

BZAP, could you restate that purpose in a way that is easier to quantify? I think a clear, simple purpose will help us to know how we are supposed to play.

What is it? I'm guessing something like.. "To determine which team kills other teams better" Regardless, whatever the purpose is determined to be... when other arguments are made, they should be viewed through this lens. So if there is a debate about whether mass driver should be allowed or not, and, assuming that the purpose is what I had guessed in the beginning of the post, then the "lens" would be, "Does mass driver being allowed in league prevent us from determining which team kills other teams better?"

Uh oh, spagetti-oh, other players are having fun in HS!

afaik: both teams started the flag game even we collected all of the flags and went to base Other team RQ Assuming rare evened automatically without targeting our sole backlanc, what is the point of evening one person when the other team has shrunk to half or a third? It only cuts the evened person out of the win, since one person (unless it's the winning team's only backlanc) would have little to no hope of reviving a 1/3 sized team. This seems awfully punitive. pictures below: http://imgur.com/bP1MNl.png http://i.imgur.com/nTQY6l.png

Is there anyway to switch easily between who you have ticked in the f2 box? I get excited when my lancasters are listed next to each other so I can only pg up or pg dn once to switch between. Would it be possible for us to sort our F2 boxes in a custom order or in some other way switch easily between which lancaster is going to be targeted with /?attach PS Another option could be to :lancaster name:?attach for temporary macros. Is there anyway to use the ?lancs command to insert attachables there? I guess :?lancs1:?attach would be really neat. edit: punctuation

1. I was reading this article. Its focus on "cooperation in large, not-personally-connected-groups" brings to mind a certain spaceship game I like to play. 2. I think a slightly larger stats tracker at the end of a flag game would be really cool with things like total damage dealt, total team damage dealt etc (if possible..) 3. If you combine the two then players on a frequency can make informed decisions on who to punish.. by voting. There would not always have to be a scapegoat and it might be accurate to punish multiple players, also this could lend itself to bullying, but overall I think it would be effective & worth implementing. my $.02

rootbear75, you spend the vast majority of your time trolling.

Okay, now I don't want to blow your mind or anything but I have traversed the barren peaks of Central Asia and I bring back to you this ungodly tactic. I present to you: ((i'm already sick of this. how can you stand yourself?)) Repel so the offending lancaster's ad goes backward and it loses ground on respawning. The phrase "so their ad goes backward" means that you fire a repel especially when the lancaster is dying. Also, I agree with Dr. Snyder. Your photon wzl speaks through the heavens to my crystal ball and I realize that I may disregard the bulk of your drivel with no consequence!

I ?cheatered Weebles Wobbles earlier today because some of my teammates complained to him and he replied by wallbombing them a few times.

kilo you are right. I was mostly taking a jab at aileron because i disliked his conspiratorial tone and he comes across as arrogant in a lot of his posts.

i'd rather troll with honest hostility than ingratiate (poorly) with an agenda

Credits to Dr. Snyder, it was his idea first. What are the caveats? I don't really see any area for abuse - it might encourage more rushers, but I think that makes camping more profitable.

that'd be true if i were less selfish.. i haven't anchored at all this reset

Dear Dev, Will you think about increasing the attach cost (and money paid to lancasters)? Also, can you implement a tk tax, paid by the tker to the tk'd? You probably don't have time or interest, but thanks for reading.

rebel army? it looks like you are the malevolent majority