Dr.Worthless

Sorry, Genetically a human and mold are vastly different, if you're honestly trying to say that killing mold == killing a baby, I must fold out of the conversation, I cannot compete with ignorance. So you'd be for abortion up until a certain point? When does an embryo qualify as a person? As early as 7 weeks a heart has developed and began beating.. At 3 months babies begin moving and have all their digestive organs in place.. If I had to comprimise on the subject, I'd say pre-7 weeks.. .. So the arguement you are presenting is since the child is dependant on another human being for life.. that it isn't yet a human.. correct?

Wow, so you're compairing a human being to mold.. gg Yet she was old enough to have sex... You're still lowering the value of a human life.. Because the human isn't born yet does not make his/her life of ANY lesser value to that life that is already born.. Show me how a newborn can sustain life on its own and i'll give your arguement validity...

The fact that you discount a life, ducky, is appauling. I really don't see how people justify murdering a human being because "Its dependant on the mother until birth.." So? Its still a life... You can argue all you want, Its still a life, a human being. "independance" isn't a criteria for life.. If that's the case I suppose I can treat the blind/deaf parapalegic living over at the YMCA as a sub-human. How about folks in coma on life support.. guess they arent humans either.. While I see where you're coming from.. this is a social issue. One deals with the right to marry, the other deals with the right to live... Life/Death > Marriage Certificate... See above.. how can it not be a person? Statistics dont have anything to do with culture.. If you want to attack the statistics given it could easily be done, especially in that example... Right.. It has to do with women justifying murder because the child is dependant on them. I seriously don't understand that arguement.. When the child is born its dependant on the mother for the first year (arguably more..) So is it justifyable to kill them, then?

Pro life arguement is pretty simple. At the moment of conception the embryo is human. Killing a human is murder. As for my personal belief, I voted "Yes in extreme cir!@#$%^&*stances" ie rape, health conerns, etc. I believe that this is the view of probably 85% of the US/world. Killing a baby because it doesn't fit in your lifestyle is wrong.

The top 50% of the tax bracket in the US provide 95% of the tax revenue.

So were you equally as appaled by Kerry's "remove tax cuts for the rich" plan? Who has the right to say because you make xx amount of income, you are not en-*BAD WORD*-led to the tax cuts every other citizen receives?

First of all, the soldiers on the carrier put the sign up, it was unbeknownst to the President until he got onto the carrier. Second of all, The president said multiple times in that speech that there was still alot of work to be done, and that the road would be long and tough. Thirdly, I'd rather have a president that looks like a baboom than be living in a country that has to get their !@#$%^&* bailed out by the world community everytime It participates in a war. I don't blame Chirac for not wanting to help in Iraq, If France would have contributed to the coalition the casualties would be well over 10k by now.

You're getting off base folks.. Bacchus said "You're getting quite a beating if you ask me" The simple fact is we're not taking any kind of beating... 1k casualties in 1+ year of involvement is excellent.

Actually, I'd call 1k deaths in a 12+ Months of operation quite a success. I wouldn't expect a frenchman to have any scope of military success, so i'll forgive you.

HOLY !@#$%^&* THOSE EXIST!? P!@#$%^&* on the code please..

All this was brought up in 2000 by gore, no one gave a flip then either. And oh yeah.. Cheney talked about kerry's voting record.. you know the guy thats running for president. I guess Cheney could have brought up edwards record, but there isn't much of one because he's spent most of his time being a trial lawyer.

WOW I don't know what debate you were watching... Cheney attacks Kerry's voting records.. his supporting the war, then calling it the "wrong war at the wrong place at the wrong time" Every "Fact" that Edwards proposed was met with a "counter fact/statistic" by Cheney. Defining Quote. "Senator, your rhetoric would be more effective if Mr.Kerry had a voting record to support it."

Draft bill defeated Don't worry you liberal media -*BAD WORD*-s, the dreaded bill that was going to re-instate a draft was defeated about an hour ago. Ironically, the Bill was drafted by a Democrat.. All of you can rest easy.. Hitler isn't going to draft you to go kill children.

Ok.. this is the first and only time I'm going to say this, and I expect it to be followed. Don't make fun of people who participate in anal sex with kangaroos. Capiche?

POTTY MOUTH

ROFL See that !@#$%^&*.. thx for digging that up vile. If I could edit my above post i'd change "liberals" to "politicians".. this whole !@#$%^&*ing presidential election is turning into one giant joke.

To above link Um.. wow Why is it that this year the liberals are so fancy to throw around accusasions that they have absolutly 0 factual backing of?

A simple case of the liberals trying to stir up trumped up information. I remember when the war first started and this e-mail was circulated around. It eventually died away because everyone realized how utterly stupid it was. Now that the election is close the liberals have dug it up again and started circulating it. There won't be a draft, come back to earth.

It would turn into a partisan battle, in which case sorry, we've got the TERMINATOR on our side. He'll be back

Or mabye god is the universe...

TIME for a republican view of things.. woot woot. Overall debate score for Kerry. C- Overall Debate score for Bush. D Personally I thought both candidates sucked a giant !@#$%^&* tonight. I seriously didn't hear a valid answer to a single question proposed by the moderator all night. The person first addressed with the question would take a general stab at the opponent, with which was replied with another attack, which then caused a response that eventually spiralled into Iraq. War in Iraq was the common theme of the whole debate, even though there was mabye 2 questions on it during the whole debate. Kerry. He was obviously a better public speaker, we all knew this going in. Key points I thought he was weak on. Pointing out America is leading the war in Iraq. Name me a major conflict in the last 50 years that HASNT been led by the US. Saying we had no alliance backing. Britain.. Poland.. 28 other countries? Hardly no alliance. Kerry constantly claiming that Iraq was a debunked war.. yet having voted for the war is pretty !@#$%^&*ing. Furthermore a constant "This is the wrong war at the wrong time" statements. Yet, His plan to be successful in Iraq is to gain more international support. Bush caught him on this.. "So how does my opponent plan on gaining international participation, convincing them to participate in a war that he views is the "wrong war at the wrong time". Kerry was at times promising the world to the american people. He'll cut taxes, yet increase social spending. He'll have increased success in Iraq, yet bring our troops home. Etc. Strong opener, was weaker as the debate went on. "Favorite Quote!!" "Its foolish to have sent our troops to war without body armor." (Yet I voted against funding them). Bush points this out.. Kerry responds. " I've made a mistake on my wording of this war.. The president made a mistake going to war, which is worse?" I was just PRAYING Bush would respond with "A vote is alittle more than wording.. Senator" But alas.. Bush isn't the sharpest crayon. BUSH WEAK POINTS Obviously wasn't very prepaired. I really liked him pounding away at various quotes that Kerry has. Particularly his "Any man who believe the world isn't safer with Saddam in it, isnt fit for the Presidency" Though his lack of public speaking prowess really showed. Seemed caught off guard by some question proposed. Was also visibly flustered and frustrated at times. I can't blame him really, though he is equally at blame for the reason, the debate spun off into a finger pointing !@#$%^&*storm that really had no resemblence to a true "Debate". General mis-use of the English language. I know alot of people dog him for some phrases and other things that he is prone to do. -*BAD WORD*-, I'm from Arkansas and I can relate to him and understands everything he says. I'm use to catching !@#$%^&* about it also, so I can relate. Favorite Quote "Amb!@#$%^&*ador NigerPontey". Heh, somehow I doubt thats how you say his name He also went on a southern induced slur at one point, creating "Im out of there in 6'th months" into "Imoutadeer in 6months" I nearly fell out of my chair laughing. Overall. Terrible debate. I was disappointed by Kerry throwing out every liberal left wing extreme conspiracy theory in the book. With references to being in Iraq for "Oil", and for "Halliburton" and "To busy catering to the wealthy to care about anyone else". Bush just didn't look prepaired, and his lack of public speaking reall caught up to him. I dont feel this debate will effect either candidate for the good nor the bad. Just was a poor performance by both parties.

Oh, you think that the intelligence is lies, sorry I didnt realize that. Obviously then we shouldn't have believed it.

Heh, it doesn't make it *not* a miracle either. Does open your mind mean anything to you?

You are so grossely misinformed Omen that its almost not worth responding to you. There's alittle thing called congress that makes the decision on goin to war or not.. And the British, Russians, Israelis, Pakistanis, etc, etc, etc. Um.. ok. I feel that the 405k americans that lost their lives in world war 2 didn't die in vain. I guess you're right however, that was for sure not worth it.. Huh, we're not? How old are you again dude? English. You're kidding right? Iraq already has women parlimentary members. Women gained more civil rights when the US occupied than they ever had in the history of the middle east...

Exodus = Old Testament (Before Christ coming and passing) Mathew = New Testament (After Christ) The Old testament is just that, Old. None of the rules setup in the old testament apply to those existing after Christs coming. New Testament = What we should be following now.