Dr.Worthless

You scored as Christianity. Your views are most similar to those of Christianity. Do more research on Christianity and possibly consider being baptized and accepting Jesus, if you aren't already Christian. Christianity is the second of the Abrahamic faiths; it follows Judaism and is followed by Islam. It differs in its belief of Jesus, as not a prophet nor historical figure, but as God in human form. The Holy Trinity is the concept that God takes three forms: the Father, the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Ghost (sometimes called Holy Spirit). Jesus taught the idea of instead of seeking revenge, one should love his or her neighbors and enemies. Christians believe that Jesus died on the cross to save humankind and forgive people's sins. Christianity 75% agnosticism 75% Islam 54% Hinduism 50% Buddhism 46% Paganism 46% Satanism 42% Judaism 42% atheism 42% A tie between Christianity and Agnostic... actually pretty !@#$%^&* close to how I feel at the current stage in my life. I'm fairly confident that a god does exist, i'm just not exactly sure that he exists and operates the way that Christianity teaches.

In a sea of liberals could I be any more moderate? Your political comp!@#$%^&* Economic Left/Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

I'm against a Cons!@#$%^&*utional Ban on gay marriage, I don't think it has any place in the Cons!@#$%^&*ution. It should be an up-to-the-states issue. If the states want it, put it up for vote. The citizens of a particular state can vote on it. I also agree with Monte, I don't think Gay couples should be adopting children, on the same grounds that he cites.

Glocks are quality pistols.

Karl Rove was hired to do a job, and he did it !@#$%^&* well. That being said, I don't like being accused of being a propogandist, brainwashed, etc etc.

If cussing offends you astro, my sincerest appologies. I take it personally insulting when a liberal tries to label me something i'm not, and does so by using statements that have no factual basis. The situation was hightened by your complete lack of even wanting to find out the facts. Its all available out there on the internet from credible sources, seek and you will find. PS. Reliable sources aren't filled with political cartoons.

Prepositions Way back in the day when I was in fourth grade, we were taught an english system called "Shirley English" It was a learning system that focused around repe!@#$%^&*ion and nifty little jingles to help you learn. For some odd reason I still remember the preposition jingle. The "B" category Preposition, preposition starting with a B Before Behind Below Beneath Beside Between Beyond But By The above link lists but as a preposition also.

Seriously dude, what makes you even more pathetic is you can actually find all of the information you want on the internet quite easily. Concentration Camps A quote from the website above. In Auschwitz, which is easily one of the most deadly and efficient concentration camp that the Nazi's used to execute the Jewish Solution did most of its killing BEFORE the Unitd States even entered the war. So in fact, the Nazi's were in a rush to kill people while they were winning the war. When the Nazi's began losing is when the death output curbed downward. Are you seriously this !@#$%^&*ing ignorant? Do you think I don't check the facts myself? Dude, once again, before you open your mouth !@#$%^&*ing check your facts, you've been wrong on all of them. If researching the facts and being right puts me on Karl Rove's team, then !@#$%^&*ing sign my !@#$%^&* up. ROFL, I hear crow is nice with alittle ketchup and mus!@#$%^&*. You'll have to remove your foot from your mouth before putting a nice heaping s!@#$%^&*ful in, of course. Oh, and by the way, considering 6 million jews were exterminated over roughly 4 years that the camps were running, I highly doubt the "camps" had a combined 1,000,000 in them at any given time. UN Security Councel Resolutions UNSCR 687 - April 3, 1991 # Iraq must declare fully its weapons of m!@#$%^&* destruction programs. # Iraq must not commit or support terrorism, or allow terrorist organizations to operate in Iraq. UNSCR 688 - April 5, 1991 # "Condemns" repression of Iraqi civilian population, "the consequences of which threaten international peace and security." # Iraq must immediately end repression of its civilian population. # Iraq must allow immediate access to international humanitarian organizations to those in need of !@#$%^&*istance. After the first gulf war, these were among the resolutions passed as part of the cease fire. I know you've never read any of the resolutions, because if you had you would realize my arguement isn't about WMD's its about the plethora of other resolutions that Saddam said "!@#$%^&* you" to the UN over. UNSCR 1441 - November 8, 2002 * Called for the immediate and complete disarmament of Iraq and its prohibited weapons. * Iraq must provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA full access to Iraqi facilities, individuals, means of transportation, and do!@#$%^&*ents. * States that the Security Council has repeatedly warned Iraq and that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations. 11 !@#$%^&*ing years later, we're telling Saddam the SAME THINGS WE TOLD HIM TO DO in 1991. This is the "decade of throwing the bird" that I described. I understand you didn't realize that a decade equals 10 years, hopefully thats cleared up for you. Again, !@#$%^&*ing go out and do your research before you come on the forum and spew !@#$%^&* out of your mouth in a half vained attempt to show that you are possibly the most brainwashed liberal !@#$%^&*bag i've ever met over the internet. Not only are you ignorant, but you have such delusions of granduer that you actually believe you're smarter than me. Thats extremely laughable. Oh really? Go !@#$%^&*ing read the resolutions sparkey. !@#$%^&* like this proves that you're the one buying into propoganda, not me. Proofs in the pudding cinderella, as to which i've provided and you've only throw around half-!@#$%^&*ed insults. "Something should be done" and "Go to war without any ally support" are two completely different things. Again, I'll !@#$%^&*ing tell you if I support the war or not if I please, until then stick to quotes. OOOOOOHH, Iraq AND Afghanistan. Sorry, I guess that means that 160,000 troops is "most" of our 1.3 million. Were you born thick-skulled and dim-witted or did you have to work at it? I really like your supporting arguement.. You were the dip!@#$%^&* that said most of our troops were in Iraq and Afghanistan. When I said you're a dip!@#$%^&*, you didn't have anything to provide otherwise. Sorry Dip!@#$%^&*, 160,000 will never be "most" of our troops, any way you slice it. ROFLMFAO. Dude, truely delusional people discount facts that are provided them. I've done all the !@#$%^&*ing groundwork for you and provided non-biased websites that provide nothing but factual information. I realize that your opinion of a factual website is one filled with political cartoons and half-witted insults, but the line has to be drawn someplace. Before you reply to this, please, PLEASE, use your brain. If I have to reply to pure and utter nonsense from you again you'll win by default, I refuse to discuss things with someone who has nothing to bring to the table. If I have to teach you anymore I'll be forced to start charging. Reading and comprehending peoples ideas are much more important =) Oh and BTW, the second quote is a run-on-sentence, not to mention the second sentence starting with a preposition. Tisk, Tisk.

Oh really? Companies in general have more influence in Washington than the American Public. Corporate Welfare is the worst thing that could ever happen to a democracy. If we truely want our government to represent us, we need to push to get corporate lobbysts thrown the !@#$%^&* out of Washington. They have no business there. Lol. Just because your nifty little link filled with neat little cartoons and propogandistic BS says otherwise doesn't mean it isn't true. I haven't done alot of research on Social Security, to be honest about it, so I have no comment. Personally, I would enjoy the option to invest my money how I see fit, but if the government wants to do that for me then right on, IMO. A long, long time from now whenever I'm ready to start drawing social security, however, it better !@#$%^&*ing be there for me.

I really, really hate to get into arguements with delusional posters who do nothing but seek venues full of like minded people so they can find others to support their delusions, but here it goes. Strap on your seat belts children. *Edit* I truely attempted to keep my composure through this post, but it became such a pain in the !@#$%^&* that I said !@#$%^&* it. WTF are you talking about!? When the United States entered the war, Hitler wasn't fighting "other fronts", there was no "other front", the only front was on the eastern front against Russia. The "Other Front" came when we, the brits, and the canadians landed on the beaches of France. Guess what sparky, Hitler was waiting for them. Are you really such a !@#$%^&*ing idiot that you tell ME to learn my history? I guess the !@#$%^&* you just got finished learning in 10'th grade world history makes you feel like your a historian, but perhaps you should have paid alittle better attention. Incase you are curious, go read about Operation SeaLion to learn about the begining of the US involvement in World War 2, its apparent you're either stupid or grossly mis-informed. Air-Strikes!? ROFL, Right, Carpet bomb the concentration camps, that will get rid of the Nazi's so we can save the remains of the Jews that are there!! Dude, you are delusional. The end of the war isn't in the discussion, you criticized the World War 2 war plan because it didn't liberate the camps first, I pointed out what a !@#$%^&*ing stupid statement that was. It was in refence to the decade of broken agreements that Saddam has commited. Ever since the first Gulf War ended, Saddam has had certain restrictions on him that he has broken and the UN never enforced. A decade later, somethings being done about them. Kim Jongs situation is correctly being delt with, with negotation. When the time comes that its apparent that negotiations wont work with him, as it was apparent with Saddam, then actions should be taken. From now on read what I say, If I want you to put words in my mouth I'll !@#$%^&*ing inform you, until then stick to quotes sparkey. If you would have taken the time to comprehend what I was saying, I was simply saying let negotations try and work, and if the do not (as in Saddams Case), then something should be done. I know reading comprehension is something that todays public schools don't teach, perhaps you should spend some of your free time learning the skill, its important. You're god !@#$%^&* right I'm serious about what I said. You can !@#$%^&*ing say whatever you want, however I've never said the war was justified and I have never said we handled it well. Nice try What do you mean its not the same thing? Videos are even more relaxed standard wise than print is. You can edit videos to portray anything you want, and for you to say you realize that he has an agenda, but then try and legitimize his agenda by saying he put it down on film is the ONLY thing in this thread that is contradictory. I noticed you used the word above, use this situation as reference so next time you can use the word in the correct context. I never !@#$%^&*ing said the "tri-state" area does not have risk, you were the one that claimed we were low risk, and eluded to the fact that we shouldn't care because we were so far away from the terrorist attacks that we should have nothing to worry about. I simply gave you the facts to make you realize next time before you open your big !@#$%^&*ing mouth to stop and realize what you're saying. For you to be as pompous enough to try and put an importance factor based on the number of lives that could be potentially lost is appauling. Total Armed Forces, census 2000 Read it, 1,366,000 troops in the armed services as of 2000. Are you honestly trying to !@#$%^&*ing attack me as a Conservative propagandist by saying that 160,000 isn't "most" of our troops? You need to remove your !@#$%^&*ing head from your !@#$%^&* and actually go out and figure out the facts before you post. Perhaps you are the one guilty of getting YOUR information from a short cited source. Yes, I !@#$%^&*ing watch Fox News, and watch the Orielly Factor every day, and frankly this post proves that I'm exponentially more informed than you are. Seriously, how could you be so !@#$%^&*ing lost in your own lies that you could believe that the United States of America only has 160,000 troops. Again, If I want you to put words in my mouth i'll give you permission to. I've never claimed the United States was part of a holy war. The only "fact" in this conversation is you are grossly ignorant of the "facts" you claim to know. I truely suggest you become more learned before attempting to get in a discussion over the Internet again. "I am suprised you have not said that God...." If this line doesn't !@#$%^&*ing PROVES that you are a mis-informed liberal biggot, I'm not sure what does. ROFLMFAO, As what i've seen im the only person in this conversation TO back my arguement up with facts. The only thing you've cited is Micheal Moore. Go out and become actually acquire knowledge on your own before you come on here again. I have no problem with opposing opinions. I do have problems with !@#$%^&*bags like you that do nothing but regurgitate democraticunderground.com and Micheal Moore F 9-11 like its gospel without researching on your own. The very fact that you resorted to attacking me personally, instead of attacking my opinions just proves what kind of a !@#$%^&*bag you truely are. Tactics like that may work in your little circle-jerk forums where all you and the trash you hang out with sit around, stroke each-others ASSS and swap conspiracy theories, but when you try and throw them at a semi-intelligent person that actually researches the issues, and attempts to form their own opinion on matters, it goes down quicker than a fifty cent hooker. You sir are no worse that the "Republican Propogandist" you accuse me of being, and the fact that you cannot, and likely will not, see that is truely !@#$%^&*ing pathetic.

Guns dont kill people, people do. Remove guns, replace it with the next most efficient tool for killing. Gun control in the United States is a bad idea.

Worthless to the rescue!!!!!!! You come off as a fairly intelligent guy but bonehead statements like these completely throw off your credibility. Wanna know the reasoning behind not going after the concentration camps at the begining of the US involvment in World War 2? I'm no expert, but perhaps its because they were all located in Germany/Poland and surrounding areas, basically smack dab in Nazi land. I'm sure Hitler wouldn't mind us strolling into the heart of his occupied territory and taking out the concentration camps, then leaving. Sounds like a stellar war plan. The site of Tora Bora is basically a big!@#$%^&* mountain chain that consists of dozens of cave systems. Saying "We knew Osama was at Tora Bora" is like saying the Russians knew Hitler was in Berlin. We're talking a very large landscape, and war is always chaos. Was it a blunder? !@#$%^&* yeah it was. Did the administration let him escape? Doubtful, and frankly you have no proof to support anything contrary. Then again that fits alot of the "theories" against the current administration. I love it when regurgitators throw around other regimes as ammunition to the arguement of why we shouldn't be attacking Iraq. We'll make a deal, whenever we deal with Kim Jong for over a decade, and he consistantly throws the UN the bird like Saddam did, we'll deal with him then. Until that point, lets let diplomatic means of controling psycho paths try and work. At this point in the game only the extreme liberal left and the mis-informed still use the oil arguement for the war. Judging from the content of your posts I really don't want to put you in the category, but then reading you referencing Farenheight 9-11 as a "do!@#$%^&*entary", and citing it forces me to put you there. Are you !@#$%^&*ing serious? Moore has got to be the biggest crackjob the worlds ever seen, he's a self serving liberal maniac who heavily edited "footage" to fit his political agenda. OO, I'm from Arkansas, can I comment? Oh really? I live 50 miles away from Nuclear 1, a nuclear power plant in Russellville, Arkansas. The whole eastern seaboard over to the mississippi is connected to the same power grid, and the nuclear plant serves that grid. If terrorists were to hit the plant, it would reduce the power supplied to that grid. If its a particularly hot day in New York, Chicago, Boston, etc.. say bye bye to power. Not to mention if there's an Easterly wind that day I can kiss my !@#$%^&* goodbye, if there isn't I can kiss it goodbye about 48 hours later. About 200 miles away, outside of Pine Bluff, Arkansas is one of the countries largest Nuclear/Biological weapon stockpiles. I don't suppose that would really be a target of interest though, compaired to New York, right? Try getting informed before you spew garbage out of your mouth. The only comment I have here is the majority of attacks in Iraq are not from suicide bombers, they are from roadside bombs/IED's. While it takes alot of people to produce these en-masse (I'd assume), it does not take a huge army to arm them and set them along side the road and wait for an American to drive by. HuH? You call 160k troops "most". Sorry, again do your research before you spew garbage. Opress other nations? Find a stick and beat that liberal back inside of you, you were posting semi-intelligently before that comment.

The only real tragedy in my opinion was the fact that they actually kept her body alive for as long as they did. If I ever have any form of accident where I'm brain dead or cannot sustain life without the help of machines to breathe for me, I'd only hope my family would honor my wish to just let me pass

As you said above, ragtag groups dedicated to G. Warfare is where the effectiveness would be. The reason the vietcong were so effective was because they knew the terrain, and were very effective in small groups that performed hit and run tactics. Here where I live in the foothills of the Boston Mountains in Arkansas, it would be !@#$%^&* for an organized force to clear people out, for the most part the population isn't centralized, and the combat would be infantry v infantry, heavy armor would be useless. And to comment on the hunting discussion above. Someone said about how pointless hunting is and that it has no practical use, or something along those lines. Living in a state with one of the highest poverty rates in the United States, and knowing more families than I can remember living on well under 20,000 dollars a year, hunting and fishing provides a very cheap food source. Though I recognize your arguement, just wanted to point out that some people do still hunt to feed themselves and their families, however foreign the idea may or may not be to you.

Funny Monte that you're "new information" doesn't include anything backing up the claims of newsweek about a guard flushing the koran down the toilet. You cannot draw conclusions to what MAY have happen based on what was proven to have happened. What we have here is a simple case of Newsweek making up fake stories because what they knew was true wasn't shocking enough. If Newsweek would have published information about the 5 confirmed cases of abuse, then we wouldn't be having these discussions. However, Newsweek chose to attempt to create a story to not only sell issues, but fit their political agenda. That's a shame, and unfortunatly they'll get away with it scot free, because people like Montezuma, and others, are willing to let them get away with it. Attempting to define a nations policy off of .05% and ignoring the 99.95% that obviousy highlights the policy is self serving. Attempting to label the United States as a state that purposfully mistreats its detainees based on 5 cases is ludicrious, and ignorant. The 5 cases that are proven should be acted upon, and the people who abused the koran be punished. However, for having 3000 detainees over 2 years, handing out well over 1500 korans, and having only 5 cases of abuse, in my book, is pretty !@#$%^&* good. I understand though that most people think that its possible to attain perfection...

"In any case, the burglary/break and enter rate is higher in the US (8.3) than it is in Australia (6. and the UK (4.. The stats seem to suggest that gun ownership doesn't prevent break and enters." Does this take into account population differences? How many of the breaking and entering cases were homes owned by a gun owner? One way is to make sure you have a free press that is not railroaded into towing the government line. Another way is to make sure that your government never gets away with abusing human rights. Never, ever. Another way is to turn up and vote and not be swayed by jingoistic, war-mongering politicians that think the only way to solve difficult problems is using overwhelming firepower and screw what anybody else thinks. ....Erm....Maybe Americans should be worried. Where do you live monte? 100 bucks says somewhere in your countries history fits the above description perfectly. ... Mabye you should be worried.

You will never convince anti-gun owners that its necessary to own a gun, nor will you ever convince the pro-gun that they'd be safer without a gun. Then, if I was that same criminal, I'd go to wherever you live Monte, and blow your head off without any worry that you'd be armed and be able to fight back. If I was a criminal in Britain, I wouldn't worry about a 'clean' gun, nor would one in the United States. Making laws against gun ownership does not punish nor hurt criminals, it only punishes law abiding citizens.

Earth to Montezuma, this is the year 2005, if there was solid proof that the Bush Administration made up a WMD threat, it would have been acted upon when the accusation came up, 2 years ago. I realize you think you're smart and all, but please, take a step back, and let reason replace your blind hatred.

Bottom line is, if you print a 3 page manual on how to handle a book, and you p!@#$%^&* out thousands of the books, you're going to have mishandlings of them. There is solid proof of 5 cases of mishandlings, flushing a koran down the toilet isn't one of them. Another source Monte, I know for an anti-bush regurgitator such as yourself, its very easy to take 5 cases of mishandling and spin it into a huge issue. Yes, There is a need for continued vigilance in insuring that prisoners are treated fairly, however, failing to recognize that the United States is in the forefront of treatement of detaines during Modern warfare is ignorant. You're letting your political agenda cloud your judgement, constant blabber from foreigners is what turned me off from this board in the first place. The very fact that this thread has 15+ replies, yet there isn't a single thread about the virtual colapse of the European Union is further proof that the only thing that appeals to you all is bush hating.

The United States is so saturated with fire-arms at this point that if your removed the right to bear arms, the only people who would have guns would be police officers, and criminals. There's rules against suicide, buttsex, crossing in the middle of the street, and not wearing a shirt in public, in all of these cases the law doesn't prevent people from doing it.

Man, if even .01% of the claims the left wing media has made against this president and his administration were true you'd have a !@#$%^&*ing SLAM dunk case to not only remove him from office but throw him in jail. To bad accusations have been made ever since the day after he was elected, yet he's been in office for what, 5 years? Do not kid yourselves, if even a s!@#$%^&*ch of this was true the democratic party in the country would be all over it like stink on !@#$%^&*, just like they would have been if any other of the accusations against the president had been true. The very fact that nothing has been done is even more proof that even though the democrats are ALWAYS right (in their minds) and the president can do no right, they could not be further detached from reality.

Newsweek fiasco Tell ya what Monte, I'll go find me an "inside source" that claims to know for fact that you like to have sex with goats while drinking a !@#$%^&*tail made from blended up babies. When you sue me for slander I'll just have the source say "Well, I'm not so sure if thats accurate" and I'll just say "oops, sorry". 5 reported mishandlings of the koran!? Chicago Tribune According to this link there was a 3 page instruction guide on how to handle the koran. 3 PAGES of instructions. With the number of detaines and the number of korans being handed out, 5 mishandlings of the koran when the instructions for doing so are 3 pages long is something you should be proud of. Name me another country that hands out religious media to its detainees... Everyone caught up in the liberal spin machine should be absolutly ashamed. How the United States has conducted itself is 100000000000000000000000x better than any other nation has ever conducted itself during a time of war. If you really want something to !@#$%^&* about, !@#$%^&* about Nazi's using their POW's for life experimentation, or Japan raping/pillaging/working people to death. THOSE are real attrocities, this petty bull!@#$%^&* is just the liberal media trying its best to find some nit picky bull!@#$%^&* to bring down the administration, god knows they can't win an election and do it the old fashioned way..

We'll estimate that the US has been in Iraq for 15 months now. Acording to IRaq Body Count.net The current Max for Iraqi civilian deaths is 17158 17158/15 = 1143 deaths a month. Saddam gained power of Iraq in 1980, and kept power until 2003. Thats 23 years, or 276 months. According to Saddam Regime body count estimate a conservative estimate for the number of people killed as a direct result of Saddam's actions would be somewhere around 330040. 330040/276 = 1195 deaths a month. Very close, numbers wise. To be fair, montezuma, only a fraction of iraq's provinces are violent right now, somewhere along th elines of 5 out of 30 I think? The Sunni Triangle (Where the largest majority of Saddam supporters were, since the Sunni were Saddams Tribe) is where the majority of the dissent is, and rightfully so, these group of people face the prospect of falling from top dogs, to be ruled by the majority shiia. I believe many people either don't know or choose to ignore the real reasons behind the violence currently occuring there. News paints a picture of complete and total country wide dissent in iraq, when the fact is that just isn't the case.

Heh, you're a joke. I'm done with the thread, enjoy =)

Heh, since you brought hitler into the discussion, he didn't build the first fully mechanized war machine with idiots, nor did he come up with tactics that he revolutionized warfare with idiots, nor was he on the verge of nuclear weapons with idiots, nor did he invent jet engines with idiots, (I could go on) WHAT!? Smart people supported Hitler OMG!?!?!? Thank you for being the internet police on my spelling, rather than counter-point the facts I present all you can do is Nit-pick. Very typical of this forum, there's about 3 folks that can hold an intelligent discussion, then the refuse comes in and spews useless !@#$%^&*. Wow, Logging onto the internet and posting on a forum puts you in the "Have brains" category!? SIGN ME UP BABY, I QUALIFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or do you have to be anal and proofread peoples posts to qualify? If you can justify calling people stupid because they didn't support your candidate, then I can justify calling you a loser, because you've been voting with a losing party for the last 8 years. Tell ya what, I'll just fall back on the catchall republicans enjoy right now. You can continue to believe you're smarter than everyone else, me and my party will just continue to run the country.