world poll:Who would you vote for?

[white_0men]

Wrong.

 

Iraq tried to invade both Iran and Kuwait. He also g!@#$%^&*ed, m!@#$%^&*-murdered, and abused his own people. But that's not what we're talking about. It's all about Mr. mean-boy with the stupid boyish grin Bush and his policies. We also don't care about the beheadings, and the recently-captured British female captive, now do we? It's all Bush's fault! Him! Him! Him! And only him!

 

Wasn't this why there was a Desert Storm?

 

Wrong yet again.

 

The US already knew of the thread. The President allowed this to happen to mobolize the country into war.

Using the !@#$%^&*umption that you meant threat, and then following your logic. GWB knew and allowed 9/11 to happen to mobilize our country into a war with Iraq?

 

Which is why unimportant countries like Australia don't care much about the war on terrorism. They're far away from the killings, that to them it all seems like fantasy. The media just feeds them fantasies that the world is okay. Which then engenders ignorant people with a false view of the world.

 

Sounds awfully like what you could use to describe the way Americans used terror before 9/11.

 

!@#$%^&* right more powerful nations deserve more say in world issues.

More powerful nations deserve more power...

 

It's so easy to make such an irresponsibale statement when you live in such a small country.  I don't know about you, but I don't like the idea of a country the size of Maine having a say in such things as our security.

 

What does the size of one's country have to do with anything? We've got more land than you, must mean we're better!

 

Where did all this crap about the UN deciding US security policy come from anyway? I missed the memo.

 

The world is not equal. This is a fact of life. Much the same was as destroying nations/iden-*BAD WORD*-ies that only wish harm among others. So we need to neutralize the treath of these Islamo-fascists, all the while not be persuaded by their simpathizers, liberals like you.

 

[Vile Requiem]

Using the !@#$%^&*umption that you meant threat, and then following your logic. GWB knew and allowed 9/11 to happen to mobilize our country into a war with Iraq?

The 9/11 timeline strongly suggests that the people who knew what the F they were doing (Cheney et al) "strongly advised" Bush to sit in Florida reading My Pet Goat while they took care of the 9/11 threats, considering as Bush was told of both planes hitting the WTC and didn't exactly bolt. Personally, i'm kinda glad they didn't let Bush make any decisions that day, it could have been much worse.

 

Now, as to their motives I can not attest, but the evidence is clear that at the very least CHENEY wanted to invade Iraq as of 1998, and he wrote a letter to Clinton advising such.

 

What does the size of one's country have to do with anything? We've got more land than you, must mean we're better!

 

Where did all this crap about the UN deciding US security policy come from anyway? I missed the memo.

 

Manifest destiny PNAC bull!@#$%^&* that is the current foreign policy of the United States. Last I checked, both Bush and Kerry pledged to hunt down terrorists whereever they are, I have no idea where the UN factors into this at all.

 

Perhaps republicans are misled by the "Global Test" remark? This indicates a lack of comprehension. If you piss off the world by your actions, you make enemies. It's almost poetic justice that the "un!@#$%^&*ialable superpower" angle the US has been pushing since Bush was selected is in jeopardy from a country so small as to be rendered "powerless" in some idiots' minds. Yes Virginia, North Korea has the bomb.

 

Desert Storm was wildly hailed as a necessary action. We had a wide coalition that broke Iraq into the !@#$%^&*hole it was before Iraq II, in large part because Iraq at that time had the world's FOURTH largest standing army. Iraq II was an oil grab as the explosives story (explained later) proves because Bush went in with the stated purpose of disarming Saddam Hussein. He did not have a wide coalition because the world for the most part saw through the farce. He cohersed several nations (Poland most obviously) to join it via promises of new military bases in their country and other benefits (I believe a spot in NATO was also discussed). As it stands, because Bush failed to secure the weapons Saddam DID have, al-Zarquai is now a powerful force to be reckoned with instead of an ant Saddam could crush under his thumb.

 

The world is not equal. This is a fact of life. Much the same was as destroying nations/iden-*BAD WORD*-ies that only wish harm among others. So we need to neutralize the treath of these Islamo-fascists, all the while not be persuaded by their simpathizers, liberals like you.

 

As we have seen in Iraq, this gung-ho bull!@#$%^&* creates military jobs, but only serves to piss more people off then you kill. It's gotten to the point where liberal means "common sense morality", which by my observation isn't a bad thing.

 

Remember, life is not a video game. Diplomacy and tactful manuvers are the only way to avoid perpetual chaos. As any student of history knows, the only man to conquer the world was Alexander the Great. If Bush is reelected, look for him to try and make it #2. You can't conquer the land anymore, but you sure can take the resources.

 

Just yesterday the story broke that while the US was busy defending the Oil Ministry in Bahgdad, people were looting a weapons cache of military grade explosives (38 tons) that had been sealed off from Saddam and was held under international protection. Odds are these bombs are now in the hands of terrorists, probably being used to kill our troops as we speak, and they can EASILY take down airplanes. This cache has been looted as recently as last Sunday.

 

That and George "I made the world safer" Bush (see the above paragraph) has a VP running around telling everyone that we could be attacked again at any moment.

 

That is why I today voted for John Kerry. And that brings me to my final point. If you don't vote, you can't !@#$%^&* about the next 4 years ("Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos"). So by absentee now, or on Nov 2nd, go and vote

 

(PS: About that Hitler Picture, Godwin's law states that the first side to envoke the Nazis loses automatically)

[MonteZuma]

Iraq tried to invade both Iran ...

Are you seriously using this to support your argument? The US helped Iraq in the Iran/Iraq war. The US should not have intervened. The US should have worked with the UN in the name of peace.

 

The US already knew of the thread. The President allowed this to happen to mobolize the country into war.

Nothing more than an undergrad conspiracy theory.

 

Which is why unimportant countries like Australia don't care much about the war on terrorism. They're far away from the killings, that to them it all seems like fantasy. The media just feeds them fantasies that the world is okay. Which then engenders ignorant people with a false view of the world.

You know nothing about how other countries view terrorism or the war on terror. About 100 Australians died in a Al Qaeda linked terrorist attack in Bali and the Australian emb!@#$%^&*y was recently bombed in Jakarta. A convoy of Australian soldiers was recently attacked, using a car bomb, in Iraq. Margaret H!@#$%^&*an works for CARE Australia. Most people in the developed world have a much better understanding of terrorism and its implications - and Iraq - than you do.

 

I don't like the idea of a country the size of Maine having a say in such things as our security.

I don't like the idea of a militaristic dolt like GWB having a say in anything related to world security.

[Vile Requiem]

Oh, and just to !@#$%^&* with Bush Supporters (seeing as the gay thread = dead):

 

As of yesterday he officially SUPPORTS CIVIL UNIONS. Goodbye single-issue voters, -*BAD WORD*-o President Kerry $

 

Flip-flopping on a grand scale.

 

EDIT: Links are fun: Newsday