Tankdan Posted September 28, 2004 Report Posted September 28, 2004 While im listing off crazy -*BAD WORD*-s i might as well add Isrealies, Cheachins, Frenchies, Palistinians and the Chinese: Im sure the list is endless.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> add to that us, americans....Do you really not understand things? Yes, there are some front line extremeist who don't know -*BAD WORD*-. On the front lines fighting for america more then 60% are below the poverty line, and most of those didn't even get a high enough grade on their act's to get accepted into any college. It's a known fact that not everyone in the army are smart, yes their are some conciderably smart people but still. And in the arab world there are deffinitly intel people high up who know probally more then any of us do about certin things. I'm not at all supporting them, I'm just saying open your eyes, we aren't the only semi-smart society out here.
Dr.Worthless Posted September 28, 2004 Report Posted September 28, 2004 All this is spawned from an arguement over if the pentagon was hit by a missle, which was already proven to be false, so why is this discussion still happening?
50% Packetloss Posted September 28, 2004 Report Posted September 28, 2004 No idea, people keep coming on here making arguments about things that no one even talked about.
white_0men Posted September 28, 2004 Report Posted September 28, 2004 Sadly people pay more attention to this than to the legality of the War on Terror (oops, I mean Iraq.)
Aileron Posted September 29, 2004 Report Posted September 29, 2004 ... This discussion has nothing to do with Iraq moron. Please don't revive dead posts, and please don't make another Iraq discussion out of this topic. Dav, I know this was a while back, but you basically don't like democracies because the real world examples of democracy are not democratic enough. So, you really think that democracy in and of itself is utterly perfect, just that current governments don't represent that en-*BAD WORD*-y. So, what are we going to do about it? I don't know. I DO know one thing about revolutions. All nations are comprised of four things: land, population, culture, and sovreignty. This works as good as an theorhetical defignition aught to. (so, don't nit-pick plz) The point is that if you look back at the revolutions that changed none of these, usually the fought and fought, took over the government and when the dust settled they had the exact same problems as they did before. Examples include the English Civil War, the mul-*BAD WORD*-ude of revolutions in France, every little revolt in Latin America, etc. A revolution merely to replace government will take us nowhere.
Recommended Posts