Jump to content
SSForum.net is back!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Ya, makes no sense. If I had BanG and access to banc-bot I would've done it as soon as Foof banned him heoh
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/9940/makaveliaq0.jpg
Posted

Okay, it seems there is a general consensus that the ban was unfair, but as i was talking to an upper staffer earlier, we needed to have logs and our word isnt worth crap any more. Of course there have been lots of witnesses to edit's rash temper, of course i apparently got him mad cuz i am a 56ker,and lord knows you cant have 56kers in continuum, no no....boo the hoo. So the only question im asking is if you instill the mod protocol, y is edit still staff and Cord the only one fired? muy interesante chicos y chicas.

 

Anduril/Guest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG LIVE THE 56kers! MAY WE KICK -*BAD WORD*-!

Posted

Yeah, it was my fault I shoulda logged it. See, the reason i didnt is cuz i've gotten kicked a few times and i thought he just kicked me. If i knew at the time i was banned for a week i woulda saved it.

O.o

Posted
there is a general consensus that the ban was unfair
I don't mean for this to sound harsh, but consensus is meaningless. We can't simply act upon general consensus without evidence. This shouldn't resemble a witch-hunt.

 

our word isnt worth crap any more

 

It isn't that your word is worth nothing, but that your word is worth as much as anyone else's word.

Posted
logs?? wouldn't logs be needed to prove he's guilty too?? but noone has logs, so, how can we not suppose he's innocent... You need proofs to prove someone is guilty, not to prove he's innocent, according to the law. I know this is just a 2d online space game blum.gif but still, this is common logic
Posted
logs?? wouldn't logs be needed to prove he's guilty too?? but noone has logs, so, how can we not suppose he's innocent... You need proofs to prove someone is guilty, not to prove he's innocent, according to the law. I know this is just a 2d online space game  but still, this is common logic

 

Think of it this way.

 

When a mod bans someone, it's like passing sentence. Mods are supposed to be trustworthy, in the same way as judges are. Mods act on evidence 'at the scene of the crime', as it were.

 

If, however, you wish to argue your innocence, you submit a formal appeal (to pern).

Posted
When a mod bans someone, it's like passing sentence. Mods are supposed to be trustworthy, in the same way as judges are. Mods act on evidence 'at the scene of the crime', as it were.

 

If, however, you wish to argue your innocence, you submit a formal appeal (to pern).

 

You must therefore have evidence to present if you wish to overturn your ban.

 

Only if you pay for it ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...