Robbel Posted July 10, 2004 Report Posted July 10, 2004 read the !@#$%^&*le.ballers should not be able to rep, or the repel range should be shortened
Delic Posted July 10, 2004 Report Posted July 10, 2004 Omg I get the best idea ever Change back to old setts! And make a new zone for all these ambitious young people who will make 1 change thinking they're fixing something and cause 5 more problems by doing so! Yay!
Telson Posted July 10, 2004 Report Posted July 10, 2004 Only two ships have repel Warbird=1Terrier=2 If the repel had shorter range it would be useless.The Problem is.. you're trying to chase the baller and hes repeling your shots...that my friend is called trying not to die play better defense...
Greased_Lightning Posted July 11, 2004 Report Posted July 11, 2004 Delic had a good point, lets not just dismiss this, but yeah Robbel, you need to just play the game and not -*BAD WORD*-
Vile Requiem Posted July 11, 2004 Report Posted July 11, 2004 Delic's wonderful point is that changing even 1 ship setting in a finely tuned cfg file will result in problems with either gameplay or ship balance. This is why I'm not taking any more concerns about these sets. If you want to gripe, do it with the 90% done ?go tobeta ones
Tipme Posted July 11, 2004 Report Posted July 11, 2004 you knoqw,,,tge okd setd had stronfer repeks so deluic doent kniw wgat hes talkunh abouyt
Delic Posted July 11, 2004 Report Posted July 11, 2004 I never said they weren't stronger.. I just said the line I always say when bïtching about settings are mentioned ;DGotta keep the tradition alive!
reload Posted July 12, 2004 Report Posted July 12, 2004 you knoqw,,,tge okd setd had stronfer repeks so deluic doent kniw wgat hes talkunh abouytIo canm';t takj tiooi
Recommended Posts