Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

Posted
?  Can you summarize your thoughts?

What I get is that perhaps you were wrong on that point:

Nuclear capabilities are not only within the US. Most US allies have active nukes with ICBM capability....let's move on shall we?

You might also want to check out what the website has to say about WMDs also, it's quite interesting

Posted
Unless you're referring to nuclear weapons, I have no idea what you're talking about when you say that we're pushing other countries to disarm. If you are referring to nuclear weapons, then you're conveniently ignoring all the disarmament pacts that the U.S. has with Russia, the world's second-biggest nuclear power.

Just as the United States is conveniently ignoring the same treaties?

The missile shield your administration is developing is a direct contravention treaties you had with the former Soviet Union.

Posted
Unless you're referring to nuclear weapons, I have no idea what you're talking about when you say that we're pushing other countries to disarm. If you are referring to nuclear weapons, then you're conveniently ignoring all the disarmament pacts that the U.S. has with Russia, the world's second-biggest nuclear power.

Just as the United States is conveniently ignoring the same treaties?

The missile shield your administration is developing is a direct contravention treaties you had with the former Soviet Union.

more hippocritical acts, how can a nation morraly enforse treaties when it isgnores some itself.

 

 

 

Kill - if your not gonna post anything sencible in poiltical then dont bother.

Posted
If you want you can ignore that site, and call it just an opinion, but you forget, i am from the Dominican Republic, and i got relatives who lived throught USA invasions and told about the atrocities they did, and what they actually protected.
I don't think that was relivant nor did I know.

 

About what SuSe said, not to be an ingrate, but who called for your aid? AID it's like a gift, but USA gives it to force a nation to do as they say.

 

Agreed to some extent. There are many times when we have given AID and then been refused help later. Wasn't it Turkey that was refusing our Troups during the Iraq conflict?

 

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/02/18/sprj.irq.erdogan/

 

 

There's some saying, that the Country who is triumphant over another, will have their version of the truth, and of course one that glorifies itself.
Completely Agree.

 

I've no doubt most USA Citizens prefer to say their country could never predict what it did, even when CIA classified reports has been opened to the public containing their plans of funding guerillas, coups, war, dictators, etc...

 

We'll I believe we're brutal, a soldier is a soldier afterall. However I doubt that our soldiers where just murderous -*BAD WORD*-s. A conqered country isn't likely going to like those who attacked it, even if the other country is justified. Also I think that the USA is by far the best country to deal with prisioners. We obide rather well to the Geneva Conventions rules, and I doubt any outher country would. Given we still must gain information as a priority... (Don't bring up that recent thing in the news kuz I think its horse-*BAD WORD*- and it is very rare)

 

 

Well the UN is biased anyway, I mean its a good step twoards a Internation Government System and Policies, however its a small one.

 

As for the Train of the US. We are on top of the food chain, and what we say goes. I realize this, but the way I also look at it who would be better and more fair than we have been?

 

Also Note, A Country's Interest not necessarily represents most people's interest in that country.

 

Well I can agree with that, however most times it does, though maybe not directly.

 

Anyway I actually have to do some work so I'm done now, sorry about the late responce I missed it earlier. Peace

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...