Tascar Posted May 28, 2004 Report Posted May 28, 2004 So today I read this: Insurgents in Najaf attacked U.S. forces and a U.S. military base today, a day after the coalition agreed to halt its offensive operations in the Shiite city to see whether radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr carries through with his pledge to withdraw most of his militia from the region. Meanwhile, two Japanese journalists are feared dead after an attack by gunmen. Now, if I'm not mistaken, both sides agreed to pull out of the area so peace can be made. The USA was withdrawing, but still...the insurgents decided that they would attack despite their leaders vow for peace. (They hold up posters of their leader while urging for an attack). If you aim for peace, and you comply with peace, and you withdraw and allow the area to become peaceful, what should be done if you get attacked? Most forces would retaliate and obliterate the area, but I think the USA will still seek a peaceful resolve to settle the area. There you bunch of anti-USA, war-mongering pigs, you call the USA the devil yet you attack them when their guard is down. That is destiny for destruction of a civilization.
Bacchus Posted May 28, 2004 Report Posted May 28, 2004 why not just gtfo of Itaq? then USA would stop being a victim. If the world must accept that USA is the strongest, purest, cleanest..what else? the archetypical ideal in the platonician sense of a truly GOOD nation. Then you should accept that those not in "the garden of Eden" long for redemption and prsence in the eye of the earthly gods...in fact, its their way of saying "we love you america". ok...now i can go back and rest my hangover.
A Soldier Posted May 29, 2004 Report Posted May 29, 2004 (edited) -nvm- Edited May 29, 2004 by A Soldier
Recommended Posts