Dav Posted May 20, 2004 Report Posted May 20, 2004 1. im from the UK 2. Its not that america doesnt care, its that america is arrogant and seems to thing their way is always right.
A Soldier Posted May 20, 2004 Report Posted May 20, 2004 lol, I think the US should ins!@#$%^&*ute a new foreign policy..... if your county is overruled by a dictator who will act on the betterment of his own behalf by killing his own people, defying the rights of the country's own talent, and enslaving the innocent, we should just.... let it be.I suppose you are refering to dicatorship installed by the US (or supported by the US) in Bresil, Argentina, Chili, Bolivia, Paraguay, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Iran, and God knows what other countries for nothing more than to satisfy economic needs?
shazbot Posted May 20, 2004 Report Posted May 20, 2004 Simply put - What are you gonna do about it. WHINE WHINE WHINE and we are still in iraq stinking it up. Oh, i know how to fix it... WHINE.
»SD>Big Posted May 21, 2004 Report Posted May 21, 2004 Simply put - What are you gonna do about it. WHINE WHINE WHINE and we are still in iraq stinking it up. Oh, i know how to fix it... WHINE."whining" had a HUGE impact in the blunder that was vietnam. iraq is another blunder.
A Soldier Posted May 21, 2004 Report Posted May 21, 2004 yeah... there's a point there. That's like asking the MG staff to stop being corrupt; whine, whine and whine jk Let's not be defeatist (sp?) Seriously though, I don't think it's whining. A lot of people are starting to realize that the true motives of war weren't exactly WMDs, nor to kick off Saddam outta there, but for more economical reasons, as were most wars during history. Unfortunatly, I believe that there is too much media propaganda in the United States (think of the Jessica Lynch affair, for example). Also, the government and big companies are closely linked togheter. Take companies like AOL, Exxon, Disney or Altria (formerly Phillip Morris) that we're big donors for Bush's 2000 campain... Don't tell me you think they expect nothing in return of the money? Who's in charge for the reconstruction right now? This whole thing could have been avoided if we resorted to the UN in my opinion.. Edit: "whining" had a HUGE impact in the blunder that was vietnam. iraq is another blunder.Agreed...
Tascar Posted May 21, 2004 Report Posted May 21, 2004 lol, ur post is a blunder...but hey, it's a free country and if you don't like the donor list from the 2000 campaign, DON'T BUY THEIR STUFF. Outside of that, JC is right.... you're just whining. When it comes down to it, do you have an answer better than simply 'finger pointing'? NO, you don't. Sit down, shutup.
Bacchus Posted May 21, 2004 Report Posted May 21, 2004 hum..no. We don't need "answers" to stop whining about it. US gov. sucks that's it. End of transmission, End of discussion. US blundered in Vietnam they are blundering in Iraq, that's the end of it.What's the fuss about? Isn't it clear enough? All in all, wether there'S conspiracy or not, who cares? USA LOSED THAT FECKING WAR!!!! JUST ADMIT IT! YOU WERE WRONG! that's about it.
Tascar Posted May 21, 2004 Report Posted May 21, 2004 haha bacchus - you're a 'finger pointer'.... nothing more. Stop crying and you'll be ok.
Bacchus Posted May 21, 2004 Report Posted May 21, 2004 haha bacchus - you're a 'finger pointer'.... nothing more. Stop crying and you'll be ok. ok, would you be my friend then?
Tascar Posted May 21, 2004 Report Posted May 21, 2004 sure why not, this whole discussion was Brain's fault. (hahaha)
Dr Brain Posted May 21, 2004 Author Report Posted May 21, 2004 I take no responsiblity for the utter moronicness of people on this thread. It sort of degenerated after I proved my point beyond a reasonable doubt (conspiracy theories are not reasonable).
Bacchus Posted May 22, 2004 Report Posted May 22, 2004 I take no responsiblity for the utter moronicness of people on this thread. Well, you should...after all you're the one responsible for other people posting moronic thoughts about it...
Dr Brain Posted May 22, 2004 Author Report Posted May 22, 2004 Next thing you'll say is that bush is to blame for that beheading video, rather than the terrorists who actually did it. Your moronicness shall not touch me! Back, villian of re-*BAD WORD*-ed thinking!
SamHughes Posted May 22, 2004 Report Posted May 22, 2004 One bomb is not the same thing as stockpiles. It could have entered the country from elsewhere, or it could have been the one bomb that didn't get destroyed by Saddam. We really don't know. This incident does not particularly add to the amount information that we have on weapons stockpiles. In addition, I'd hardly call that bomb a WMD. Remember that WMD is a weapon of m!@#$%^&* destruction: i.e. one weapon that can kill thousands, or even millions. How many people did that bomb kill? If I remember correctly, it was zero. It might have killed a few more than that. However, it is by no means a WMD. Machine guns, on the other hand, they are WMDs.
Tascar Posted May 22, 2004 Report Posted May 22, 2004 My right jab is a WMD. And Dr Brain's zone is a WMD - just watch...lot's of players...then suddenly...woosh! all gone! hahaha, jk
Dr Brain Posted May 22, 2004 Author Report Posted May 22, 2004 One bomb is not the same thing as stockpiles. It could have entered the country from elsewhere, or it could have been the one bomb that didn't get destroyed by Saddam. We really don't know. This incident does not particularly add to the amount information that we have on weapons stockpiles. In addition, I'd hardly call that bomb a WMD. Remember that WMD is a weapon of m!@#$%^&* destruction: i.e. one weapon that can kill thousands, or even millions. How many people did that bomb kill? If I remember correctly, it was zero. It might have killed a few more than that. However, it is by no means a WMD. Machine guns, on the other hand, they are WMDs.The s-*BAD WORD*- was not designed to be detonated in the way it was. The chemicals mixed after the explosion rather than before. *That* is why no one died. That one s-*BAD WORD*- was something Saddam claimed to have destroied before the first gulf war. And where there is one, there are more. Again, the question isn't weather he had them. The question is who has them now? My biggest fear is that one of the missing WMDs is on its way to a US city. Ever thought about what would happen if a nuke went off in the nearest city to you? If the blast doesn't get you, the radiation spread by the winds might.
»SD>Big Posted May 22, 2004 Report Posted May 22, 2004 My biggest fear is that one of the missing WMDs is on its way to a US city. Ever thought about what would happen if a nuke went off in the nearest city to you? If the blast doesn't get you, the radiation spread by the winds might.that's scary, you know, like the kind of scary that comes from a super power invading your country.
Dr Brain Posted May 22, 2004 Author Report Posted May 22, 2004 If you happen to be in power in said country, yes. However, if you are part of the oppressed masses, it would be a good thing.
Bacchus Posted May 22, 2004 Report Posted May 22, 2004 what'S wrong with Iraq then? oh...it's the rebels and the news..it looks like a mess but the truth is that everything is good in a perfect world...a paradise.. ok, now i get it. oh, and pollution is also a WMD.
Dr Brain Posted May 22, 2004 Author Report Posted May 22, 2004 what'S wrong with Iraq then? oh...it's the rebels and the news..it looks like a mess but the truth is that everything is good in a perfect world...a paradise.. ok, now i get it. oh, and pollution is also a WMD.What's wrong in Iraq? Not much (if you don't count the terrorists). You're probably taking the totally biased media's word on everything, correct? The media doesn't want victory in the War on Terror. They want JFK in office more than they care about the lives of the troops over there. They are on the same side as Al Queda. Think about that. They want us to lose this war.
»SD>Big Posted May 22, 2004 Report Posted May 22, 2004 what'S wrong with Iraq then? oh...it's the rebels and the news..it looks like a mess but the truth is that everything is good in a perfect world...a paradise.. ok, now i get it. oh, and pollution is also a WMD.What's wrong in Iraq? Not much (if you don't count the terrorists). You're probably taking the totally biased media's word on everything, correct? The media doesn't want victory in the War on Terror. They want JFK in office more than they care about the lives of the troops over there. They are on the same side as Al Queda. Think about that. They want us to lose this war. how ridiculous
»ZiGNoTZaG Posted May 23, 2004 Report Posted May 23, 2004 sadam proved to the world that he wasnt sane when he invaded kuwait. there is no room in the world for invasion and conquest. Screw the WMD, he should have been and was removed from power by a government not content to sit around and wait for tragic events to take action. Iraq will eventualy be tamed. kill the semi-intelligent leaders, kill enough low iq religious sheep, and their sons. Degrade and berate the prisoners, create more fear than hatred. Just a matter of time. fight terror with terror. quite simply put...the world will be a better place without them. arnt i the humanitarian?
Bacchus Posted May 23, 2004 Report Posted May 23, 2004 lol there is no room in the world for invasion and conquest.200 years of US history: 0.81 war a year Iraq will eventualy be tamed.Iraq is a country, were after Saddam or after Iraq. Get your facts straight plz. That soundd invasive and conqueror-like. kill the semi-intelligent leaders More muslims have died at the hands of killers than—I say more Muslims—a lot of Muslims have died—I don't know the exact count—at Istanbul. Look at these different places around the world where there's been tremendous death and destruction because killers kill."—Washington' date=' D.C., Jan. 29, 2004 "In an economic recession, I'd rather that in order to get out of this recession, that the people be spending their money, not the government trying to figure out how to spend the people's money."—Tampa, Fla., Feb. 16, 2004 "King Abdullah of Jordan, the King of Morocco, I mean, there's a series of places—Qatar, Oman—I mean, places that are developing—Bahrain—they're all developing the habits of free societies."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 29, 2004 "But the true strength of America is found in the hearts and souls of people like Travis, people who are willing to love their neighbor, just like they would like to love themselves."—Springfield, Mo., Feb. 9, 2004 "My views are one that speaks to freedom."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 29, 2004 "In my judgment, when the United States says there will be serious consequences, and if there isn't serious consequences, it creates adverse consequences." "There is no such thing necessarily in a dictatorial regime of iron-clad absolutely solid evidence. The evidence I had was the best possible evidence that he had a weapon."[/quote'] kill enough low iq religious sheep, and their sons.mmh....you didn't thought about it very long, did you? ! Pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands' date=' [b']one Nation under God[/b],indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. btw, before someone starts flaming me for anti-americanism, this isn't meant as an insult (well not quite ), but Zig, you're basically saying:" Don't do as i do, but do as i say". I simply disagree. And your comment is so radical you could end it with "Insh'Allah" or something. Edited: The Picture was offensive... -nintendo64 (ok, understood Nin- Bacchus)
MonteZuma Posted May 23, 2004 Report Posted May 23, 2004 Next thing you'll say is that bush is to blame for that beheading video, rather than the terrorists who actually did it. Your moronicness shall not touch me! Back, villian of re-*BAD WORD*-ed thinking!Fact is, if Bush listened to Blix and most of the Europeans, hundreds of Americans and thousands if Iraqis would still be alive, and so would the guy who was beheaded. Was the war worth it? What are we being protected from?
Recommended Posts