Dr Brain Posted May 17, 2004 Report Posted May 17, 2004 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html Basicly says that they found a sarin nerve gas s-*BAD WORD*- used as a bomb. No one was hurt, thankfully, even though a couple were exposed. But It proves, just like I have been saying, that there were WMDs in Iraq at one point. I personally think that the question isn't weather Saddam had them, but rather where are they now? If he didn't have them, he would have had no reason to not submit to inspectors. Well, I said two months ago he had them. And, he did. The UN did fail. You are drawing the entirly wrong conclusion from the lack of weapons in Iraq. The question is where the -*BAD WORD*- are they now? Seems that some of them are STILL in Iraq. But I think most of them are elsewhere now.
Tascar Posted May 17, 2004 Report Posted May 17, 2004 The CIA put them there...it's all part of a conspiracy theory! hahah Next.
MonteZuma Posted May 17, 2004 Report Posted May 17, 2004 I wouldn't be surprised if the sarin gas was staged. We'll probably find out soon that it was a Mr Gaspo helium balloon cylinder that went off in a party store. The woman who was 'exposed' to the gas was blowing up Thomas the Tank Engine balloons for a kids party when the accident occured.
Dav Posted May 17, 2004 Report Posted May 17, 2004 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html Basicly says that they found a sarin nerve gas s-*BAD WORD*- used as a bomb. No one was hurt, thankfully, even though a couple were exposed. But It proves, just like I have been saying, that there were WMDs in Iraq at one point. I personally think that the question isn't weather Saddam had them, but rather where are they now? If he didn't have them, he would have had no reason to not submit to inspectors. Well, I said two months ago he had them. And, he did. The UN did fail. You are drawing the entirly wrong conclusion from the lack of weapons in Iraq. The question is where the -*BAD WORD*- are they now? Seems that some of them are STILL in Iraq. But I think most of them are elsewhere now. At one point being the opperative word, it was know there were WMDs at one point. The war was over WMDs when they were being searched for of which there were none found (still arent) so does it not stand to reason that saddam may have finally listend to the UN and got rid of them?
Bacchus Posted May 17, 2004 Report Posted May 17, 2004 lol, the only thing it's proving right now is that they found a sarin nerve gaz s-*BAD WORD*- somewhere in Iraq.
Dav Posted May 17, 2004 Report Posted May 17, 2004 lol, the only thing it's proving right now is that they found a sarin nerve gaz s-*BAD WORD*- somewhere in Iraq.S-*BAD WORD*- being the opperative word, it litterally means nothing but it will be hyped for the purposes of properganda
Dr Brain Posted May 18, 2004 Author Report Posted May 18, 2004 so does it not stand to reason that saddam may have finally listend to the UN and got rid of them?If he did, then why the -*BAD WORD*- didn't he allow the weapon inspectors back in?
Bacchus Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 hey, i suspect the usa to use torture on prisoners at Guantanamo bay...if i go there with Amnesty international, will they let me in?
Tascar Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 well, u know what they say.... "stupid is as stupid does"
Ancient Power Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html Basicly says that they found a sarin nerve gas s-*BAD WORD*- used as a bomb. No one was hurt, thankfully, even though a couple were exposed. But It proves, just like I have been saying, that there were WMDs in Iraq at one point. I personally think that the question isn't weather Saddam had them, but rather where are they now? If he didn't have them, he would have had no reason to not submit to inspectors. Well, I said two months ago he had them. And, he did. The UN did fail. You are drawing the entirly wrong conclusion from the lack of weapons in Iraq. The question is where the -*BAD WORD*- are they now? Seems that some of them are STILL in Iraq. But I think most of them are elsewhere now. Last I checked nukes were made of uranium and plutonium... not sarin...
Dr Brain Posted May 18, 2004 Author Report Posted May 18, 2004 Don't forget hydrogen. But sarin is a chemical weapon. Chemical weapons are WMDs, along with nukes and bio weapons.
50% Packetloss Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/sarin/basics/facts.asp
50% Packetloss Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 lol, the only thing it's proving right now is that they found a sarin nerve gaz s-*BAD WORD*- somewhere in Iraq.S-*BAD WORD*- being the opperative word, it litterally means nothing but it will be hyped for the purposes of properganda a s-*BAD WORD*- is the device that is used as motor. So you shoot it off from the ground and hopefully it hits the target. This weapon stems back to WWI so go read some history btw, operative* literally* propaganda*
Tascar Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 didn't the CIA plant that too? I think the CIA planted Baccus and 50% Packetloss too....wait, maybe they planted me to mix it all up and confuse you all with what is right and what you think is wrong! haha Ok...so, has anyone bothered to ask the most simple question here....who is to benefit in the future from the things occurring daily? Maybe that will help you figure something out? Then again, if you're a conspiracist, forget it.
50% Packetloss Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 I wouldn't be surprised if the sarin gas was staged. We'll probably find out soon that it was a Mr Gaspo helium balloon cylinder that went off in a party store. The woman who was 'exposed' to the gas was blowing up Thomas the Tank Engine balloons for a kids party when the accident occured.The CIA planted me to correct forum spelling. occurred* BTW, montezuma, please get rid of that ugly avatar and get a smaller banner so that I can read your posts
Dav Posted May 18, 2004 Report Posted May 18, 2004 so does it not stand to reason that saddam may have finally listend to the UN and got rid of them?If he did, then why the -*BAD WORD*- didn't he allow the weapon inspectors back in? Weapons inspectored were allowd in, they found nothing but the US withdrew them and attacked anyway.
Dr Brain Posted May 19, 2004 Author Report Posted May 19, 2004 Two words, dav: Serious mental problems.
Vile Requiem Posted May 19, 2004 Report Posted May 19, 2004 Hooray for topics over nothing! Rummy hasn't even confirmed it to be Sarin yet, or perhaps Cool Whip?Thus we have to currently label this substance "Mystery Fluid" Is saddam's urine a WMD? It could be that too
Vile Requiem Posted May 19, 2004 Report Posted May 19, 2004 Then I retract my statement, though it's still unmixed sarin.
Dav Posted May 19, 2004 Report Posted May 19, 2004 well its definatly no WMD then. This makes the US seem more wromg about all this.
MonteZuma Posted May 20, 2004 Report Posted May 20, 2004 I wouldn't be surprised if the sarin gas was staged. We'll probably find out soon that it was a Mr Gaspo helium balloon cylinder that went off in a party store. The woman who was 'exposed' to the gas was blowing up Thomas the Tank Engine balloons for a kids party when the accident occured.The CIA planted me to correct forum spelling. occurred* BTW, montezuma, please get rid of that ugly avatar and get a smaller banner so that I can read your posts 50%, You'll make someone a nice secretary. Who knows, maybe I'll let you work for me some day? Do you have nice legs? As for the avatar/banner. Ummmm. No. My advice: My Controls-->Options-->Board Settings-->Do you wish to view members avatars when reading topics?-->Select "NO" My Controls-->Options-->Board Settings-->Do you wish to view members signatures when reading topics?-->Select "NO"
Tascar Posted May 20, 2004 Report Posted May 20, 2004 lol, I think the US should ins!@#$%^&*ute a new foreign policy..... if your county is overruled by a dictator who will act on the betterment of his own behalf by killing his own people, defying the rights of the country's own talent, and enslaving the innocent, we should just.... let it be. there dav, when your country (wherever you come from) is screwed, we should turn the other way...isn't that how you want it? It seems that most of the world thinks that the USA DOESN'T care.....i would hate to see that day.
Recommended Posts