Jump to content
SSForum.net is back!

Recommended Posts

Posted

so this might not seem like too big of a problem to other people, but has anyone found a way to open up a second client on windows 7?

i upgraded from xp awhile ago, and it seems to be a mild improvement

however, it is terribly inconvienient to try to talk to other people in pm or on a chat while trying to develop an asss zone, play a non ssc zone, or just to switch zones frequently, or use another name required for staff access

nothing critical, but still terribly annoying

SSC Distension Owner
SSCU Trench Wars Developer


3:JabJabJab> sometimes i feel like when im in this mood im like a productive form of Cheese
Dr Brain> Pretty much everything you said was wrong. Except where you called me a lazy jerk with no time. That was true.
3:KrynetiX> do you ever open your web browser and type ?go google
5:Ceiu> Wow. My colon decided that was a good time to evacuate itself.

Posted

unfortunately, that was one of the first thing i tried

 

it has 2 options: run as admin or run as another user, and both just draw focus to the one already running

SSC Distension Owner
SSCU Trench Wars Developer


3:JabJabJab> sometimes i feel like when im in this mood im like a productive form of Cheese
Dr Brain> Pretty much everything you said was wrong. Except where you called me a lazy jerk with no time. That was true.
3:KrynetiX> do you ever open your web browser and type ?go google
5:Ceiu> Wow. My colon decided that was a good time to evacuate itself.

Posted

using vms is cheating

 

also very slow and unwieldy with a huge overhead

SSC Distension Owner
SSCU Trench Wars Developer


3:JabJabJab> sometimes i feel like when im in this mood im like a productive form of Cheese
Dr Brain> Pretty much everything you said was wrong. Except where you called me a lazy jerk with no time. That was true.
3:KrynetiX> do you ever open your web browser and type ?go google
5:Ceiu> Wow. My colon decided that was a good time to evacuate itself.

Posted
Game was made 17 years ago. Computers are 2^(17/1.5)=2580 times as powerful today, according to Moore's law. Serously, who cares about the overhead? Even if a VM ran 200 times slower, it'd be fast enough (and a web search suggests the average program is between 1.5x and 20x slower).
Freedom is the right to be wrong.
Posted
you people -_-"

SSC Distension Owner
SSCU Trench Wars Developer


3:JabJabJab> sometimes i feel like when im in this mood im like a productive form of Cheese
Dr Brain> Pretty much everything you said was wrong. Except where you called me a lazy jerk with no time. That was true.
3:KrynetiX> do you ever open your web browser and type ?go google
5:Ceiu> Wow. My colon decided that was a good time to evacuate itself.

Posted

i can confirm that sandboxie works, but i wish there was a way using os facilities

 

feels like such a hack

SSC Distension Owner
SSCU Trench Wars Developer


3:JabJabJab> sometimes i feel like when im in this mood im like a productive form of Cheese
Dr Brain> Pretty much everything you said was wrong. Except where you called me a lazy jerk with no time. That was true.
3:KrynetiX> do you ever open your web browser and type ?go google
5:Ceiu> Wow. My colon decided that was a good time to evacuate itself.

Posted (edited)

You could do it if you could find a way to delete the mutex that the client creates.

I don't know any easy to way to delete it with code. It would be very easy to create a wrapper to delete it every time you launch it if you could find a way.

 

A work-around to delete it is to use SysInternals Process Explorer. Click on Continuum.exe in top pane. Press Control + H and find the mutex in the bottom pane. You have to do this every time you start Continuum.

 

The mutex is named "mtxsscont".

 

edit:

 

I did a little research to find a way to close a mutex created by another process.

 

http://pastebin.com/2q2xGqKX

Tested with visual studio 2010 and mingw.

 

The argument is the path to your continuum.exe.

Edited by jareth
Posted

and thats the winning ticket

sandboxie was limited to +1 program

 

do you think theres any negative consequences to closing that handle?

SSC Distension Owner
SSCU Trench Wars Developer


3:JabJabJab> sometimes i feel like when im in this mood im like a productive form of Cheese
Dr Brain> Pretty much everything you said was wrong. Except where you called me a lazy jerk with no time. That was true.
3:KrynetiX> do you ever open your web browser and type ?go google
5:Ceiu> Wow. My colon decided that was a good time to evacuate itself.

Posted

do you think theres any negative consequences to closing that handle?

 

Could be, I haven't tested anything. I would bet that the mutex is only to limit the processes though.

Posted

that was my assumption as well

id bet youre correct

SSC Distension Owner
SSCU Trench Wars Developer


3:JabJabJab> sometimes i feel like when im in this mood im like a productive form of Cheese
Dr Brain> Pretty much everything you said was wrong. Except where you called me a lazy jerk with no time. That was true.
3:KrynetiX> do you ever open your web browser and type ?go google
5:Ceiu> Wow. My colon decided that was a good time to evacuate itself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...