Biller is down (back up now)

[»Nude For Satan]

recycling is legal. so get use to seeing me use it a ton.

 

3. Picking up greens is TOOOOO HARD for hunters. What we need in this zone is an ATM machine. You go up, and shoot the ATM and then my ship will be full of toys. I shouldn't have to work at greening, that's stupid. My mommy thinks it's dumb also. Greens help turrets more then hunters. Remove greens from the zone, hunters don't need them. All i have to do as a hunter is ship change and get a new ship with the toys i want. If i don't get a ship with rockets and burst i just instantly ship change again. As soon as i ship change and get a COOL ship i then rocket the turret and slam into it trying to kill it. However if a turret recycles for toys lets yell and scream and ban them.

3. Toys are too easily gained through greens, bonusing etc, agree. Would rather the bonus system be scaled back than removing greens tho. Means there is still some actual legwork involved in gaining the toys. I think you SHOULD have to work at greening. Hence scale back bonuses and let people green their toys more than gaining them through automatic means.

*actually good point inside the sarcasm here from Gad* - how about, when !fullship becomes available, its time to make !sc tougher. !sc only from safe, too?

Edited April 8, 2011 by Nude For Satan

[»Nude For Satan]

But i wonder if [Esc Q] or ship changing to avoid deaths ..... by which you artificially affect stats (which seems pretty important to you) ..... would fall under 'cheating' ?

Its very very lame but for purposes of action taken, is not considered cheating. On a ... umm ... layman-term, I guess ... basis, yes I would call it cheating. But its not actionable.

However, there is a reference amongst the rules to acting in a way that is detrimental to the zone in general. I would consider that this falls under that heading. Personally I would like to see this be actionable. Its more complicated than that (don't ask me to explain because I don't fully really understand every part of it from A to Z), though.

 

But then again, youve already used multiple-computers, for various other reasons to 'cheat' and nothing was done ...... so chances are nothing will be done anyway. Which would explain why you continue to do it

My understanding is that this is incorrect.

 

And Ethy ..... he ALREADY did get his way. So he found that it works ..... therefore, why change

As long as he cries, he doesnt need to actually do anything else

I gottah get back to that thread shortly to continue our argument. Apologies but I'm squeezing it in with work. But in short, this is also erroneous. It might have worked out handy for Gad that the resultant action was how it was, but Gad & Co did not force the result.

[Jazz]

Im not sure what part you think is incorrect ?

The multiple-computers was already mentioned by two admins ..... and what was done ? Hes till DOING it.

 

But anyway ..... if you want, msg me. But i think we're going to have to agree to disagree

Beyond what ive already mentioned in how things played out, and the lack of info and the RESULTING appearance, there are other reasons that make that appearence seem likely that i may tell you in pvt if you want to discuss

[»Nude For Satan]

The multiple-computers was already mentioned by two admins ..... and what was done ? Hes till DOING it.

 

Yes it was, something was, and no he's not afaik.

[AnselAdams]

Why do people get upset about others using various legal aspects of the game to their advantage? I especially don't understand why this thread turned into a flame war against Gad.