Anti-Ragequit Idea

[omnomnom]

Hopefully I didn't miss a thread about ragequits recently...

 

 

Anyways reward could be higher for losing team if the team ragequits. Also just making the reward higher during imbalance might motivate people. Also, maybe people not on flagging teams should get loss money from flag game.

 

So its 3 ideas. Any good?

[espo]

reverse flip the script type shit ftw

[Zasso]

Easy way to guarantee no RQ.

 

Total Loser JP = Most # of players on losing freq * 25% winner's jp.

To split loser's jp, just divide number of players on freq at the end when they lose.

 

That way if you RQ, you not only lose out on your own jp, you increase the share of the people who stay behind. $

Doublepunch. WhamBam.

 

This might even incite people to join losing team on purpose, cause they might end up getting more money than winning team. $

 

 

Perfect idea imo. Implement pls.

[espo]

Right now I need xp more than money so I don't mind being on the losing team because they usually get rewarded more xp than the winners. I do like Shuuhei Hisagi's idea though.

[Unix]

Award more exp to losing team. 10 exp at most for losing isnt that big, considering the money not gained compared to the winners could be 10-15k on average in good games.

[OrangeeoZ]

Make jackpot worth $0

 

Make kills worth double/triple the amount in BASE.

 

That way, this will promote longer flag games, less RQ, and more EXP.

[Cheese]

translation: bring back bountying

[OrangeeoZ]

translation: bring back bountying

 

"Bountying" still results in people ragequitting.

[spidernl]

translation: bring back bountying

 

"Bountying" still results in people ragequitting.

 

Making basing into 100% organized tradekilling is just stupid.