Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I've been playing here for a little while now, and lately I've noticed people are sometimes reluctant to be a lanc. I've noticed this most often in smaller games, < 6-8 per side.

 

I don't know why people are reluctant because I've never lanc-ed, but I guess the money and exp-making opportunities are less because lancs often don't get as many kills?

 

So how about rewarding team-player lancs, possibly by:

 

1. At the end of a flag game, giving lancs a higher winning / losing prize.

-Players could abuse this by switching to lancs as the game ends. So only reward those players that have been lancs longer than n minutes.

-Or only reward x players that have been lancs the longest per team (e.g. top-3 longest-serving lancs per team)

 

and/or

 

2. At the end of a flag game, give lancs "assist" money/exp.

-For all players that attached to a lanc during the game, give the lanc some percentage / formula of the money and exp that player earned during the game (e.g. 1 exp + $10 per attached player's 5 kills, or 2% of attached player's earned money+exp or something like that).

-The reward could be scaled according to the number of attaches / have some minimum number of attaches, to prevent players switching to lancs at the end.

-This would reward front-lancs nicely, but back-lancs probably get relatively fewer attaches, so reward back-lancs with the longest-serving lancs described in #1.

Posted (edited)

Money rewards are not the issue.

 

1. Very little exp

2. Very boring

3. Very boring

 

I make more money with lanc than by rush but that does not help the fact that it is boring.

 

4. Very boring

Edited by vetta64
Posted

Lancs already get money from every player that attaches to them. They get twice as much if they have a summoner.

 

 

I honestly did not know this, Brain.

Posted

omg burned

I get $5 per attach with summon. Not sure how much non-summon lancs and lg/meds get. Is it true that lancs have a larger leech range? Do they get higher $ per leech kill?

Posted

omg burned

I get $5 per attach with summon. Not sure how much non-summon lancs and lg/meds get. Is it true that lancs have a larger leech range? Do they get higher $ per leech kill?

Yes to both.

Posted

If you were being sarcastic, and did know that lancs get attach money... why were you posting?

 

 

I must uphold my duty and express my rights as Xog, Poster of the Century.

Posted

 

 

 

I must uphold my duty and express my rights as Xog, Poster of the Century.

I don't like you, and I think that most people don't like you.

Posted

I must uphold my duty and express my rights as Xog, Poster of the Century.

I don't like you, and I think that most people don't like you.

 

 

http://i43.tinypic.com/ny7o5u.jpg

Posted

Money rewards are not the issue.

 

1. Very little exp

2. Very boring

3. Very boring

 

I make more money with lanc than by rush but that does not help the fact that it is boring.

 

4. Very boring

 

you forgot:

 

5. Having your teammates using you as a meat shield

6. Putting up with your teammates blaming you for dying because they all used you as a meat shield.

Posted

Its more a matter of, noone wants to do it but neither do they appreciate the person who actually lancs.

No exp + no respect = what's the point.

 

I also love when people claim that they have no lanc and some one else should do it, but yet they have rly nice tac levi or pd weasel etc and plenty of cash.

Priorities right?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...