Attach cost & TK tax

[adi]

Dear Dev,

 

Will you think about increasing the attach cost (and money paid to lancasters)?

 

Also, can you implement a tk tax, paid by the tker to the tk'd?

 

You probably don't have time or interest, but thanks for reading.

[»Purge]

Sounds like you're trying to make some extra money...

[adi]

that'd be true if i were less selfish.. i haven't anchored at all this reset

[Kilo]

TK tax is actually a pretty good idea, with some caveats...

[adi]

Credits to Dr. Snyder, it was his idea first. What are the caveats? I don't really see any area for abuse - it might encourage more rushers, but I think that makes camping more profitable.

[Kilo]

I mean it couldn't be used as an automatic punishing system. What happens if you have $0 or low enough anyway? Also, bypassing the ?give restrictions. With attaching that doesn't matter so much because it's just meant as a bonus to lancasters.

[Samapico]

If you have 0$ and you tk... most likely you didn't intend to and you're just a complete noob.

 

What if you have 0$ and you try to attach? Does it tell you that you suck too much to be part of a flag game? Perhaps it does... but creating money with teamkills would be really stupid... you could create even more money by switching freq and getting real kills. By "creating money" I mean, the teamkiller has 0$, and yet the guy who gets teamkilled gets some money... In the ?attach case I guess it would be easy to abuse if it was that way... But it could simply not transfer money if you have 0$.

 

 

 

Not sure if that made any sense, I drank a bit tonight

tldr: good idea