Want to make money faster? LEGAL Idea

[»D1st0rt]

Alright lets see.... Mod bends rules to kick possible dev for zone ya that's neat.

No bending of the rules is required and I have no idea why you're calling this "dev". NEXT!

 

ps it's not about the money, its about the cooperation, I already said I don't give a f*** about the f****** jackpots and money and never will. I want to see cooperation, not f****** money you jerk.

I'm sorry, what's the title of this thread? OH RIGHT, "Want to make money faster? LEGAL Idea", but no money never came into consideration at all. If you want to see cooperation get people to cooperate to WIN a flag game, not lose one. Or can you only win flag games if every other game the enemy tries to hand it to you?

[aquarius]

I'd have much more fun trying to ruin this

i plan on being on the same frequency as samapico when this goes down.

[aquarius]

I'd have much more fun trying to ruin this

i plan on being on the same frequency as samapico when this goes down.

Really op2, it would be fun to ruin this. Try something that is logical instead?

 

dev for zone

Do that.

[Kilo]

I have to agree though, nothing would be more hilarious than people getting angry at you playing the game correctly instead of doing this.

[Samapico]

I'd have much more fun trying to ruin this

i plan on being on the same frequency as samapico when this goes down.

Really op2, it would be fun to ruin this. Try something that is logical instead?

 

 

WE SHALL ASSEMBLE A REBEL ARMY!

[adi]

rebel army? it looks like you are the malevolent majority

[BDwinsAlt]

I can see how it's possible. But it really sucks the fun out of the game. It's like, dang man it's there turn to win. Well I'm gonna go, I got other stuff to do. It defeats the purpose of the flag game. Everyone wants more money, that's why the team that works the best together usually wins. It's all about team work. If people start laming the flag games, I hope the raise the prices by the percentage of higher income on average of each player. So it will defeat this, sort of like opression. . I don't want to hate, but I really don't like that idea. It might kill the zone. A good way to make money is all these people who store it and never use it, give it to someone when they need it instead of listening to crickets churp when they ask for it.

[Cheese]

this idea will fail simply because its a dumb idea, and that theres collectively less cooperation in hs than in a hockey match between gorrilas and giraffes with mohommed as referee.

 

 

It's like balancing a broom on your palm. No one's saying that it can't be done, but you've got everything working against you, and the slightest hiccup will cause the whole plan to fail.

 

wtf dude, have you ever tried that?

its actually quite easy due to the length of the broom and inertia

 

 

PS lol at @ pickle penis

 

also loled at this

Edited January 6, 2010 by Cheese

[»D1st0rt]

its actually quite easy due to the length of the broom and inertia

Alright then, give me the closed loop transfer function with a PID controller.

[op2rules]

Actually you know what guys? I was going all out for this but I changed my mind. I'd rather smoke weed all day and fuck my hs enthusiasm... first person to quote this gets 700+k (person who said they would cooperate)

[Unix]

Actually you know what guys? I was going all out for this but I changed my mind. I'd rather smoke weed all day and fuck my hs enthusiasm... first person to quote this gets 700+k (person who said they would cooperate)

Do I win?

[op2rules]

Actually you know what guys? I was going all out for this but I changed my mind. I'd rather smoke weed all day and fuck my hs enthusiasm... first person to quote this gets 700+k (person who said they would cooperate)

Do I win?

 

ya free 750k for u thx for cooperatin nicely unlike everyone else here; have fun with it

Edited January 7, 2010 by op2rules

[op2rules]

Oh ya ships too forgot, next person to quote (other than unix) that said they would cooperate gets 1.2M free

[Unix]

Oh ya ships too forgot, next person to quote (other than unix) that said they would cooperate gets 1.2M free

sersiouly, i cant win?

[»Ceiu]

Oh ya ships too forgot, next person to quote (other than unix) that said they would cooperate gets 1.2M free

 

Don't forget to save at least 50k for me to cover the bet.

[op2rules]

Oh ya ships too forgot, next person to quote (other than unix) that said they would cooperate gets 1.2M free

 

Don't forget to save at least 50k for me to cover the bet.

 

Oh yha, make that 1.15M to whoever quotes that message...

[kid]

Actually you know what guys? I was going all out for this but I changed my mind. I'd rather smoke weed all day and fuck my hs enthusiasm... first person to quote this gets 700+k (person who said they would cooperate)

i would cooperate for 700k

[op2rules]

K since no1 claimed it (courage that was an epic joke, you didn't read anything) I'm gunna give away frees. Cya guys

[Corey]

Just to start things, off, I will explain this now and give a date later for when this will occur.

 

Here is the plan, there are 2 flagging freqs. The jackpot is eval'd by how many players are playing on each team, therefor fighting over it is a horrible way to win. My idea is that if Team 91 would let Team 90 win once, and then Team 91 would win the next round, and vice versa. It is NOT illegal to do this and mods are NOT allowed to fine you for doing this unless stated otherwise by bending rules.

 

Now your probably thinking that teamwork in this zone is shit, and this will never happen right? Well look at it this way, if you're willing to do this, state so here. Now there will always be people on the attacking freq who don't trust this plan and will attack anyways, but if only 2/3 or 1/2 or even 1/4 of the attacking freq is attacking, vs all 100% of the defending freq, they will still win.

 

The goal is to do this for 4 games, twice per freq. If you are GAME into doing this, please state so here and I will assign a date sometime in the near future where we can all go ahead and do this.

 

Edit:

 

Again guys, even if you think the idea will completely fail, I say it's worth a damn shot. Just give it ONE try, that's all I ask.

 

Edit2:

 

Also, if by any chance a mod decides to pull something stupid here, like fining you all 50k each whatever for doing something 'illegal' I WILL REFUND YOU AS BEST I CAN. EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU. But you NEED to post in here to get more people!

 

lol there are so many things wrong with this idea. I got to the third paragraph and had to stop reading.

 

1. No one will co-operate

2. If you havent noticed by now, mods could care less as to what happens

3. If by some fluke way this ends up working, in a couple of days it will become illegal.

[Aileron]

Alright, I have a variation of this idea, one that I have already employed myself for what its worth.

 

If you are losing, don't rage-quit.

 

If everyone does this, people will make more money in the grand scheme of things. Yes, sticking around to lose the flag game does not benefit *you* in the *short term*, but having a climate where players get the jackpot they earn benefits *everyone* over the *long term*. It gives players more reason to flag.

 

Yes, you might not win *this* game, but if you stick around for somebody else, they have reason to stick around for you the *next* game when *you* win.

 

 

Unless you are PC and never win a flag game, you actually gain something by not rage-quitting.

[»Ceiu]

Rage-quitting doesn't affect the jackpot; but thanks for playing.

[Dr Brain]

It does if the team quits before the other one has a chance to collect all of the flags.

[»Ceiu]

...

[kid]

It does if the team quits before the other one has a chance to collect all of the flags.

It seems like this would cease to be ragequitting. More like regularquitting or spontaneousquitting.

[Samapico]

It often happens that one team has control of all the flags, but doesn't necessarily 'own' them all at that moment... Some can be neuted in the FR. If people RQ then, it sucks