SSShield Spam

[Gravitron]

Diwa has best one yet.

jabjab...one word: FUgly.

 

 

Juan had the original Photoshop file for the logo posted on his website a while back. It may be what Maverick has linked to.

You can probably make a very large version out of that one.

[»jabjabjab]

What the fuck? I was just responding to aquarius's statement on how he said mine was an obomination and I was just trying to be creative. I love Diwa's shield... seriously wtf..

[Gravitron]

Creative?

You were just imitating this, and rather poorly if I may say.

[»Lynx]

Yes, putting down people who are doing new works for Subspace makes sense, Ori. You're doing a good thing. You're a decent guy.

 

Prick.

[Gravitron]

Yes, putting down people who are doing new works for Subspace makes sense, Ori. You're doing a good thing. You're a decent guy.

 

Prick.

Oh, I beg your pardon. Here, allow me to roll a carpet at his feet and worship the "new works for Subspace" that are being produced, obviously, out of pure genius!

 

 

Nothing like the use of an insult and name calling me to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that my statements are factually wrong and your opinion is the only truth that matters.

I humbly withdraw as per given your overwhelming wisdom, my argument was shattered flat and proved baseless to stand the trial of logic. I am defeated.

Edited December 27, 2009 by Ori Klein

[»Lynx]

Some stupid bullshit. It's not even a reply, but I had to reply anyway.

 

 

I like how you've used the term 'factually wrong' to impotently power your argument. There is no fact in what you've said, just useless words. But, I'd like to mention that throughout your other long-winded condescending blabbering posts, you've been whinging that there should be less talk and more action. Now there's more action, you're putting the people who are actually doing anything. You sir, are an idiot.

 

For now, I beg you take your own advice.

 

...Stop the jabber and get cranking, and if you can't crank, then remain quiet...

[»Maverick]

Would a moderator mind splitting this topic up, splitting the useful posts related to the question of the topic starter from the pointless flaming?

(Remove this post if necessary.)

Edited December 28, 2009 by Maverick