CDB-Man Posted July 24, 2009 Report Posted July 24, 2009 Why was ship change delay changed to (almost) nothing? As we witnessed, it led to mass thors. Instead of putting limit on thors, why not undo the change to ship delay? I don't see any need for 0 delay to shipchange. This would also allow antiwarp to slow thors. Currently, antiwarp's usage in base is only to stop (rare) portals and prevent flag warpouts. It should also be a utility to stop thors. Also, is antiwarp in center a glitch or an intended change? It should be fixed.
BZAP Posted July 24, 2009 Report Posted July 24, 2009 Why was ship change delay changed to (almost) nothing? As we witnessed, it led to mass thors. Instead of putting limit on thors, why not undo the change to ship delay? I don't see any need for 0 delay to shipchange. This would also allow antiwarp to slow thors. Currently, antiwarp's usage in base is only to stop (rare) portals and prevent flag warpouts. It should also be a utility to stop thors. Also, is antiwarp in center a glitch or an intended change? It should be fixed. Agreed 100%
LeftsideChaos Posted July 24, 2009 Report Posted July 24, 2009 I love the 0 delay for ship change. Add a fair bit more action being able to go from a rush lanc to a jav chasing flaggers. As for thors, I bet theyll end up getting nerfed in the near future. Removing prox on them or lowering their damage would be acceptable. Also, IMO aw in center should be bannable.
Samapico Posted July 24, 2009 Report Posted July 24, 2009 You can't remove prox from thorsAnd if their damage is lowered, all bombs' damage will be lowered too
Kilo Posted July 24, 2009 Report Posted July 24, 2009 the simple answer to your question is that it became unimplemented
Samapico Posted July 24, 2009 Report Posted July 24, 2009 How does something 'become' unimplemented? It got destroyed in a core upgrade or something?
CDB-Man Posted July 25, 2009 Author Report Posted July 25, 2009 I love the 0 delay for ship change. Add a fair bit more action being able to go from a rush lanc to a jav chasing flaggers. As for thors, I bet theyll end up getting nerfed in the near future. Removing prox on them or lowering their damage would be acceptable. Also, IMO aw in center should be bannable. Left, for the most part, the ship delay ran out by the time a rush lanc dies. I think having a 10 second delay is reasonable. Thoring takes no more than 6 seconds in my opinion. the simple answer to your question is that it became unimplemented What are you referring to when you say unimplemented? Are you referring to ship change delay or AW in center?
Corey Posted July 25, 2009 Report Posted July 25, 2009 Rofl, cdb you should edit your post to just say. "arnk do you love canadians?"
Sound Posted July 25, 2009 Report Posted July 25, 2009 I could whine about thors for hours... agree. + ban lsc for delay love, nazi
Acer Posted August 5, 2009 Report Posted August 5, 2009 I also love the ship change. It makes it so I can help out my team more and faster then I could do with a delay on changing ships.
Samapico Posted August 5, 2009 Report Posted August 5, 2009 The server should prevent shipchange when antiwarped, however. It makes evading AW far too easy, and restocking takes 1 second.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now