Suicide_Run Posted September 25, 2008 Report Posted September 25, 2008 Imagine you wake up after going through surgery for getting a cir!@#$%^&*cision but instead you feel something is missing...guess what? Your penis got cut off instead. How would you feel? Life would suck pretty bad if you were young and were a virgin and that happened to you. The lawsuit states that Patterson received consent to perform a cir!@#$%^&*cision and only a cir!@#$%^&*cision, and that Seaton did not consent to his penis being removed. Kevin George, the plaintiff's attorney, said Patterson amputated the organ after finding cancer, but he only had consent to remove the foreskin. "Sometimes you have an emergency and you have to do this, but he could very easily closed him up and said, 'Here are your options. You have cancer,' and the family would have said, 'We want a second opinion. This is a big deal,'" George said. The lawsuit also claims the plaintiff did not consent to general anesthesia.Man Sues Doctor After Penis Gets Amputated - Source Quote
FMBI Posted September 25, 2008 Report Posted September 25, 2008 (edited) Maybe it's better he was a virgin, so he won't know what he's missing? Edited September 25, 2008 by Finland My BorgInvasion Quote
Aceflyer Posted September 25, 2008 Report Posted September 25, 2008 Poor Mr. Seaton. Poor Mrs. Seaton. I'll note though that Suicide has left out the fact that in this case, this was a 61-year-old married gentleman, hardly young or a virgin. Quote
FMBI Posted September 25, 2008 Report Posted September 25, 2008 (edited) Why, that lying liar. He implied an implication that I was foolish enough to swallow like a piece of salami on a hot summer's day. Spoiler! --Click here to view--Explicit, random, !@#$%^&* below.Spoiler! --Click here to view--I guess now they should just cut off the uninfected parts and start working on a !@#$%^&*oris and vagina for SRS, eh? Edited September 25, 2008 by Finland My BorgInvasion Quote
Incomplete Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 !@#$%^&* man, i'd go on a rampage, kill the doctors that did it before taking my own life. What a way to go. Quote
Cancer+ Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 Yeah, if someone took my penis...I would kill the doctors and then myself. No point to live after that... Quote
Samapico Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 You could live for revenge and cut off all the doctors' penises around the world. You'd call yourself Peniscutter, and have a nice suit, and some superhero would have to fight you. Quote
Audry Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 Sama... you're a geek. man thats baaaaad. The doctor is an !@#$%^&*hole to take the decision himself. Quote
Dav Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 heh doctors have to do whatever it takes to keep someone alive unless told not to. Means anything from cutting off your penis to leaving you as a vegetable for a decade if required. Quote
Sketter Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 The Doctor has no right to remove the penis. There is a reason why paper work is required. Legally, A patent has the right to refuse treatment, even if refusing treatment would be terminal, that is their right. (DNR's is a good example. It is actually a loop hole for a doctor to let some one die, since they take that "do no harm" oath .) Doc should have done his job, then told them what he found. The odds are the doctors will try to settle, and this story will be pushed out of the news. Sketter Quote
Sketter Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 (edited) heh doctors have to do whatever it takes to keep someone alive unless told not to. Means anything from cutting off your penis to leaving you as a vegetable for a decade if required. The problem with this is that it would then need to be determined if it is in fact an "emergency" situations. In an ER situation the doctors have the right preserve life. But in this cause, it was a scheduled appointment for a cir!@#$%^&*cision. The problem with cancer could have been quite severe, but not at the emergency level. With limited information from the article you can only assume symptoms prior to the incident. I don't think if his penis was in pain or if the patient had complained about problems, he would have asked to get cir!@#$%^&*cised. Doctors lose. As to being left in a vegetative state. You can get around that with a DNR, since the patient would required a feeding tube that can be refused with a DNR.The wife, husband, family (sorry but common laws are rejected by law) can sign one, and the feeding tube would be removed. (also applies for ventilator) And you would die in a matter of days from dehydration.(Yes, this does happen more often then you think. I have witness family first hand getting their feeding tube removed. ( she was 85, had cancer, and already asked not to be kept a alive if her cancer ended up putting her in a coma...which it did. ) And death by this means is never a petty sight. Sketter Edited September 26, 2008 by Sketter Quote
Aceflyer Posted September 26, 2008 Report Posted September 26, 2008 It is indisputable (or it should be indisputable) that the doctor in this case overstepped his boundaries by a large margin. As has been pointed out, it was clearly not an emergency (read: imminent life-or-death) situation and the doctor has no excuse for not allowing the patient to decide whether or not he wanted to have his penis amputated. Quote
rootbear75 Posted September 27, 2008 Report Posted September 27, 2008 i bet the doctor was jealous of the size of the old man's penis so he removed it Quote
FMBI Posted September 29, 2008 Report Posted September 29, 2008 i bet the doctor was jealous of the size of the old man's penis so he removed it You'd know about that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.