Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

Posted
Oh really? mind to explain to me why i was banned when i actually never came into this zone before last night?

 

Oh right, there is no real reason.

 

Suck to be you.

 

I wouldn't usually respond to ban 'appeals' in threads like this, but I'll make an exception this time.

 

One does not need to actually enter a zone in order to violate zone rules via such antics as cross-zone har!@#$%^&*ment or advertising other zones in said zone's official chat channels (antics which may not always be netbannable but may certainly be locally bannable).

 

You were banned for 2 days on 08/24 for participating in X`terrania's re!@#$%^&*ed group har!@#$%^&*ment effort, You were banned for another 2 days on 08/27 for various reasons, the most prominent of which was your antics in this thread. L Y N X was banned for 3 days for his collective efforts against SWE - including starting this thread, but also including various other incidents. (Yes, this thread initially didn't involve SWE, but it was patently obvious from the beginning, given the nature of this thread, that SWE would get drawn into the mix sooner rather than later.) All of this is per SWE ban policy, which calls for a "1-3 day ban" for violation of the "respect" rule. Personally I would have preferred placing longer bans against some of you, but instead I placed bans of only 2 or 3 days in accordance with SWE ban policy.

 

Also note that SWE ban policy was a collective product of SWE staff, and that this exact same policy has been in place - untouched, unedited, unmodified - for over 5 months now.

 

As for why I placed bans of 2 or 3 days instead of bans of 1 day, SWE ban policy only specifies a "1-3 day ban" and leaves the exact duration to the judgment of the operator. One of the factors I use in determining ban length is whether the player in question has contributed positively to the zone in the past. Another factor is whether the player in question is likely to continue the objectionable behavior in question in the future. None of you, except for CRe>, have contributed positively to the zone in the past. All of you seem quite likely to continue your re!@#$%^&*ed behavior in the future.

 

(Before X starts whining again, as I know he will: In X`terrania's case, he was banned for 2 days for violating the "respect" rule. The remainder of his ban pertains to a local copy of a yearlong MG ban for IRL har!@#$%^&*ment as well as various other incidents of har!@#$%^&*ment.)

 

What exactly is this "IRL har!@#$%^&*ment" ban you're talking about? Do share more on this one, please.

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'd just like to add something about that errr? "har!@#$%^&*ement" i did?

 

I sent you one single ?msg, cause ter asked me too, since you wasnt answering his, and he wanted to know the exact reason for his ban. I fail to see how this single message can be called har!@#$%^&*ement...

 

You should really put that oh so big e-ego on the side ace... seriously this isnt good for anyone.

Posted
You know, if you all stopped caring as much about space ship life than about real life you would have something productive to do.

 

Lol.

Posted
You know, if you all stopped caring as much about space ship life than about real life you would have something productive to do.

 

I agree with Purge. I also want to thank Purge for closing the other thread. While I understand that cir!@#$%^&*venting a thread closure by starting a new thread to continue the closed thread is typically frowned upon at SSForum.net, I also understand that this is the Spam Lounge. In any case, I, at least, will respect Purge's decision, and will bow out of this thread starting now.

Posted
You know, if you all stopped caring as much about space ship life than about real life you would have something productive to do.

 

I agree with Purge. I also want to thank Purge for closing the other thread. While I understand that cir!@#$%^&*venting a thread closure by starting a new thread to continue the closed thread is typically frowned upon at SSForum.net, I also understand that this is the Spam Lounge. In any case, I, at least, will respect Purge's decision, and will bow out of this thread starting now.

 

Yea I'll bug you ingame then.

Posted

God, you guys act like females. (granted in x's case, he sortof is a female)

 

What's the point in bugging Ace? Like it's going to solve anything. All you are doing is making yourselves look like morons.

 

I mean seriously, you should all grow the !@#$%^&* up.

Posted
God, you guys act like females. (granted in x's case, he sortof is a female)

 

What's the point in bugging Ace? Like it's going to solve anything. All you are doing is making yourselves look like morons.

 

I mean seriously, you should all grow the !@#$%^&* up.

 

who r u

Posted

I honestly agree with Sneakerz.

 

You guys spend so much effort har!@#$%^&*ing the guy, if you took that same effort and put it towards something more productive, you could probably out do him seeing the amount of time you have on your hands.

Posted
Wasting time har!@#$%^&*ing someone is a bad thing to do, but it only takes a minute or two to make a post on here, so that argument kinda fails.
Posted
Except the fact they seem to spend so much time in game har!@#$%^&*ing him. Referring to that more than here where yeah, takes like 30 secs to post.
Posted
Polix, lol, in case you didn't notice Aceflyer seems to make !@#$%^&* seem like it's more than it actually is. Check the other topic.

 

I'd agree on that.

Posted

(I figure posting in this thread is fine now that PoL has entered it. blum.gif )

 

Let's review the facts, shall we?

 

> I made a local (SWE) copy of a yearlong MG ban.

X`terrania then coordinated a group cross-zone har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

> I placed short-duration (2-day-long) local (SWE) bans against the participants in said har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

massive amounts of crying and whining ensued here.

> I placed a few additional short-duration local bans for some whiny posts attacking SWE here.

More crying and whining ensued here.

> Purge, a SSForum.net Moderator, closed the thread to stop said crying and whining.

X`terrania then promptly started a new thread to continue said crying and whining.

 

[sarcasm]Yeah, I'm obviously the one making mountains out of molehills.[/sarcasm] :D

Posted
(I figure posting in this thread is fine now that PoL has entered it. blum.gif )

 

Let's review the facts, shall we?

 

> I made a local (SWE) copy of a yearlong MG ban.

X`terrania then coordinated a group cross-zone har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

> I placed short-duration (2-day-long) local (SWE) bans against the participants in said har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

massive amounts of crying and whining ensued here.

> I placed a few additional short-duration local bans for some whiny posts attacking SWE here.

More crying and whining ensued here.

> Purge, a SSForum.net Moderator, closed the thread to stop said crying and whining.

X`terrania then promptly started a new thread to continue said crying and whining.

 

[sarcasm]Yeah, I'm obviously the one making mountains out of molehills.[/sarcasm] :D

 

>He had not entered SWE in a long time.

>There was no group har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

>Attacking SWE? You've got to be kidding me.

>Bleh can't come up with something on that.

Posted (edited)
>He had not entered SWE in a long time.

 

Irrelevant.

 

>There was no group har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

 

[Aug 22 22:06] can i have a hug?: hi x wants to know why he's banned for 24 days randomly, so how about you stop hiding and tell him

[Aug 22 22:07] BELLEND: hi x wants to know why he's banned for 24 days randomly, so how about you stop hiding and tell him

[Aug 22 22:08] wO: hi x wants to know why he's banned for 24 days randomly, so how about you stop hiding and tell him

[Aug 22 22:08] Betemoth: hi x wants to know why he's banned for 24 days randomly, so how about you stop hiding and tell him you racist !@#$%^&*

[Aug 22 22:09] MaRBReD: hi x wants to know why he's banned for 24 days randomly, so how about you stop hiding and tell him

[Aug 22 22:10] Audry: hi x`ter wants to know why he's banned for 24 days randomly, so how about you answer his pm and tell him

 

The facts beg to differ.

 

>Attacking SWE? You've got to be kidding me.

 

There were posts which indicated that random people have entered SWE and promptly gotten banned for no reason at all. There were also posts which indicated that the above has been a common occurrence in SWE.

 

>Bleh can't come up with something on that.

 

Thank you for ceding the point.

Edited by Aceflyer
Posted
You've got to be kidding me. You banned people from SWE for ?messaging you regarding X`terrs ban which he has been asking you about which you've completely ignored. But if you want to be so specific, if I'm correct the SWE ban policy requires people to know why they are once they are banned hence making your ban defected. Really "you racist !@#$%^&*" shouldn't really be considered har!@#$%^&*ment.
Posted
(I figure posting in this thread is fine now that PoL has entered it. blum.gif )

 

Let's review the facts, shall we?

 

> I made a local (SWE) copy of a yearlong MG ban.

X`terrania then coordinated a group cross-zone har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

> I placed short-duration (2-day-long) local (SWE) bans against the participants in said har!@#$%^&*ment effort.

massive amounts of crying and whining ensued here.

> I placed a few additional short-duration local bans for some whiny posts attacking SWE here.

More crying and whining ensued here.

> Purge, a SSForum.net Moderator, closed the thread to stop said crying and whining.

X`terrania then promptly started a new thread to continue said crying and whining.

 

[sarcasm]Yeah, I'm obviously the one making mountains out of molehills.[/sarcasm] :D

 

 

Lol, way to obsess over me more by looking for ways to ban me from your zone even when I don't go in there.

 

You were banned for 2 days on 08/24 for participating in X`terrania's re!@#$%^&*ed group har!@#$%^&*ment effort, You were banned for another 2 days on 08/27 for various reasons, the most prominent of which was your antics in this thread. L Y N X was banned for 3 days for his collective efforts against SWE - including starting this thread, but also including various other incidents. (Yes, this thread initially didn't involve SWE, but it was patently obvious from the beginning, given the nature of this thread, that SWE would get drawn into the mix sooner rather than later.) All of this is per SWE ban policy, which calls for a "1-3 day ban" for violation of the "respect" rule. Personally I would have preferred placing longer bans against some of you, but instead I placed bans of only 2 or 3 days in accordance with SWE ban policy.

 

(Before X starts whining again, as I know he will: In X`terrania's case, he was banned for 2 days for violating the "respect" rule. The remainder of his ban pertains to a local copy of a yearlong MG ban for IRL har!@#$%^&*ment as well as various other incidents of har!@#$%^&*ment.)

 

It's also quite funny how when we had our bans removed by someone else in your zone immediately me and several "offenders" came in to play, and actually had a 30-60 minute game going for awhile in SWE. Maybe if you left the zone - no, the game! - permanently then SWE could actually prosper for awhile with some decent pop?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...