Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was curious as to which one is preferred when adding staff lists to zone pages? Or rather which one looks better?

 

In the linear version, the list can drag the page down a lot, depending on how much staff you have, and if you're including former staff as well. The advantage to this however, is that it's easier to add descriptions on the side of a player's name. Example:

http://wiki.ssforum.net/index.php/Devastation

 

In a table'd version, the list is more neatly organized and it doesn't drag the page on forever. The disadvantage is that it's more difficult to add extra information, although this could be included in the player's page instead. An example can be seen here:

http://wiki.ssforum.net/index.php/User:Hakaku

Posted

actually, as long as you know how the table is formatted, it's fine.

worst comes to worst, you have to count, or re-edit ur edit

 

but, i like the linear, cause 1, its a lot easier to add people to the list, and 2, it looks cleaner

Posted
I was curious as to which one is preferred when adding staff lists to zone pages? Or rather which one looks better?

 

In the linear version, the list can drag the page down a lot, depending on how much staff you have, and if you're including former staff as well. The advantage to this however, is that it's easier to add descriptions on the side of a player's name. Example:

http://wiki.ssforum.net/index.php/Devastation

 

In a table'd version, the list is more neatly organized and it doesn't drag the page on forever. The disadvantage is that it's more difficult to add extra information, although this could be included in the player's page instead. An example can be seen here:

http://wiki.ssforum.net/index.php/User:Hakaku

 

I think the linear one looks simpler and is less likely to be accidentally screwed up in terms of formatting by someone who drops by and edits it. Just my opinion, though.

Posted
I have to say i like the table version, looks a lot better and is easier to see vast numbers of staff on a single screen.
Posted

Yeah... I guess a template for that would be nice. The table is indeed nicer imo. But without a template, it's a mess in there blum.gif

 

Have no idea how templates work though... if it's something that requires admin, tell me, but if you wiki mods can do it, have fun smile.gif

Posted

Well I like both, but my main reason for trying out the table'd version was because I didn't like how the page dragged on endlessly, making it seem like there's more content then there actually is.

 

If you're going to make a template out of it though, make sure to design it using HTML, not WikiMarkup. And if no one's done it already, I'll see if I can get a dummy template up for comparison.

Posted
Well I like both, but my main reason for trying out the table'd version was because I didn't like how the page dragged on endlessly, making it seem like there's more content then there actually is.

 

If you're going to make a template out of it though, make sure to design it using HTML, not WikiMarkup. And if no one's done it already, I'll see if I can get a dummy template up for comparison.

 

Its in html. I'm already half way complete.

Posted

Alright, I updated the page with comparisons between three different ways to obtain relatively the same effect. The first being the original code, the last being a template*, so that the syntaxt needed is simplified:

{{Table
| sysop=
| mod=
| smod=
| botop=
| dev=
}}

http://wiki.ssforum.net/index.php/User:Hakaku

 

*Note: It's not a fully functional template, so if you omit one of the criterias, it'll still appear.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...