Aceflyer Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 lol... the NYC subway system is no where near nice. it's dirty, smells like !@#$%^&*, hot as !@#$%^&* during the summer, and is really in bad shape.this is why i always take the car over the subway. See my post above. I clarified that it was "nice" in terms of convenience (at least relative to Boston's system), not in terms of comfort. As far as taking the car: see the section quoted from your own post below. that's probably one of the dumbest things ever. have you even been out of your house to know what NYC is like?taking the taxi is pretty stupid.it's chaos on the streets every minute of every day, and you end up paying for a !@#$%^&* load from your taxi sitting in traffic. This is why I've always preferred taking the subway when I've been in NYC.
darkhosis Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 public transit, what's this? i think tyler, tx might have some busses? *boggle* haha
Hoch Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 Public transport isn't too great in London, it isn't too bad either. I can normally get a train within 5 minutes. Unless there are delays.Which form of public transportation are you talkingabout? The Underground? Overground? Main linetrains? DLR? Buses? I only ask because even though London does nothave the most timely public transportation system(the Germans and Swiss would get that award) itis certainly the best one as far as connections andease of getting around. At least I think so Just curious -Hoch
Incomplete Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 (edited) London Underground. It's all good when there aren't delays. But when there are delays (which is often) it is !@#$%^&*. Then there are the talks of the strikes, which are just even more annoying. Also whenever we have a little bit of bad weather, if its a load of rain, snow, wind then delays are inevitable. Edited April 28, 2008 by Incomplete
ESCANDAL0SA Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 [This is why I've always preferred taking the subway when I've been in NYC. taxi drivers don't give a !@#$%^&* if they sit in traffic, it's more money for them. but when i drive, it's easy to find shortcuts, cut people off, to get there faster. i rather take the car.
Aceflyer Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 [This is why I've always preferred taking the subway when I've been in NYC. taxi drivers don't give a !@#$%^&* if they sit in traffic, it's more money for them. but when i drive, it's easy to find shortcuts, cut people off, to get there faster. i rather take the car. To each their own.
Hoch Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 *I cannot believe I am about to write this* Now hold on now. The Tube isn't all that bloodybad. I will give you the extorted fees. But theOyster card has gone a long way to speeding upthe time you spend at the ticket gate to the plat-form. I remember the pre-Oyster days, and itwasn't nice. Now that's the only !@#$%^&* thing I'llgive Red Ken credit for! I just feel sorry for thepoor (sucker) tourists that visit the city and endup having to pay full fare. Service wise I cannot really disagree. I take theCentral Line in every day, and anyone who knowsanything about London knows that it is the CentralLine that gets delayed the most (it's the red onefor all you foreigners ). Barring a signal failure,which to this day I still cannot quite figure out howin the !@#$%^&* that happens, the service is quite good.Though I do remember going up to Harrow CrownCourt back in February and someone fell on theline. Yikes! Climate control is an issue. Fortunately the pasttwo summers have been relatively mild. But anytime it gets above 20 degress, and when you arepacked in tighter than a Las Vegas !@#$%^&* duringan all male porn convention, it is down right mis-erable. That said, I have yet to come across aEuropean underground system that has air-condi-tioning. Most main line trains do, e.g. the GermanICE or the Swedish X2000, but not an undergroundtrain. -Hoch
Aceflyer Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 Does the London subway ever come above ground? Both the Boston and the NYC subways have significant portions that run above ground, with above ground stations (especially the Boston subway), which is probably why all subway trains have climate control.
Sass Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 Not to burst anyone's bubble, but I gotta tell ya, my gas output has been higher than normal lately! Must be those late night drinking sprees!
Suicide_Run Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 Maybe its about time you switch to hybrid? But those things are god dam expensive.
»doc flabby Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 (edited) Does the London subway ever come above ground? Both the Boston and the NYC subways have significant portions that run above ground, with above ground stations (especially the Boston subway), which is probably why all subway trains have climate control.Most of the london subway is overground. What you may not realise is that the Uk is as normal using majority outdated tech. The is no air conditioning on the tube at the moment. They are considering installing it. In a hot summer temperatures can hit 37-38 degrees celieus underground Still the people who live in London are lucky, they have a public transport system that works. For anyone not living in a major city (aka pop less than 100k) the public transport system is pretty much useless. Trains and bus time tables dont tie up. I live in one of these more "rural" areas (only 30mins train ride from london) Buses run every 30 mins here. Except they stop at 5.30pm. Cost more than driving, even at the current prices. They frequently turn up late, or not at all.Trains come on time (generally) every 30 mins. Except they cost significantly more than driving. The Oyster is great except your details and all your trips are pretty much open season to the security services Edited April 28, 2008 by doc flabby
CRe Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 http://money.cnn.com/pf/features/lists/global_gasprices/ Netherlands is pretty expensive. I've heard that Jamaica is like 60$ per gallon of gas so..
Hoch Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 I wouldn't say most of the London Underground isoutside. If I recall correctly, nearly 65 or 70% issubterranean. Only a handful of lines are moreoutside than in, e.g. the Bakerloo, Metropolitan andHammersmith lines. But certainly rural or outliningareas get the short end of the stick. In general, pub-lic transportation is appalling compared to our Euro-pean neighbours. I have found that there is marked difference in temp-erature depending on the line that you use. For ex-ample, the District line tends to be cooler than theNorthern line. I suspect that is the result of the formeroperating on a wider line. This allows for greater airflow. Nonetheless, it can get pretty miserable as Iwrote earlier :/ -Hoch PS, your article is way out of date cReEmy
Samapico Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 Why would they call it a subway if it wasn't underground?
Aceflyer Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 Why would they call it a subway if it wasn't underground? It's called a subway if there's at least a significant portion that is underground. Most of the Boston system in terms of stations and all is probably overground, but there are quite a few underground stations downtown, so I suppose that's why it's called a subway. The Dallas system, on the other hand, has exactly one underground station, so it generally isn't considered a subway.
Aceflyer Posted April 28, 2008 Report Posted April 28, 2008 most people call it the "metro" No, the Boston system is called the "T" last time I checked.
rootbear75 Posted April 28, 2008 Author Report Posted April 28, 2008 most people call it the "metro" No, the Boston system is called the "T" last time I checked.i wasnt talking specifically about boston. in most places in the US, it is a "metro" system.
ESCANDAL0SA Posted April 29, 2008 Report Posted April 29, 2008 i wasnt talking specifically about boston. in most places in the US, it is a "metro" system. most people in new york just refer to it as the train.
Incomplete Posted April 29, 2008 Report Posted April 29, 2008 Also, I was surprised at the amount of people who throw themselves in front of trains. I've witnessed it twice, one time in Twickenham, another in Isleworth, and my trains been delayed due to it more times than I can remember during the time I've been going to college. Pretty depressing, but I think that Richmond are installing gl!@#$%^&* barriers on all of their platforms to prevent it occurring as often. PS: I hate ticket inspectors. Yeah they do this already to stop people jumping infront of trains. It's a pain in the arse because all it does is create delays for everyone. If they want to die then do it peacefully to cause minimum disruption. I suppose they're just drama queens and want the world to stop because they have died.
Dav Posted April 29, 2008 Report Posted April 29, 2008 simple solution is buy a bike. In many cities it is actually a quicker way around. Bike beat car, boat and public transport when they tested it on top gear in london
Incomplete Posted April 29, 2008 Report Posted April 29, 2008 I saw that. BikeBoatPublic TransportCar were orders they came in. I would buy a bike but I don't fancy cycling 15 miles to get into work have a hard day moving / lifting heavy equiptment and then having to cycle 15 back.
Recommended Posts