Tankdan Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 i don't know if anyone has brought this up, so delete the topic if you must. What do you guys think happend with JFK seeing thats its going to be 40 years since it happend soon. Do you think Oswald acted alone? Or was there someone else in the "grassy Knoll". Do you think its possible for one man to shoot three bullets that fast with a sniper rifle in 1963?Any thoughts on any of this is alright...
Bueshtak Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 The Illuminatus tells us the truth!
Guest feef Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I think Micheal Jackson was a co-conspirator. I once heard that the government, when performing black ops, will do things in such a silly, absurd, non-sensical way that if you ever saw what they did or found out about it, you'd sound like a nutball when explaining it to the authorities.
madhaha Posted November 23, 2003 Report Posted November 23, 2003 All hard evidence we know of has already been carefully destroyed. JFK's brain (which could have given us lots of ballistic info) although sectioned and preserved in the autopsy is now missing. Tissue samples, color slides of the autopsy and all evidence pertaining to the number of shots fired and the trajectory is missing. Files on Lee Harvey Oswald concerning his connection to US intelligence and his Civil Air Patrol youth leader and Mafia/CIA pilot David Ferrier are missing. The Zapruder film has several frames missing. JFK's cabinet were flying en-route to Japan at the time of the assassination. The code books that would have allowed them to communicate with Washington were found missing after a search. They were forced to radio in on regular insecure channels. Newly released information show that the Warren Commission report was altered in wording (the part pertaining to where JFK was shot) in a way that more closely followed the official version of events which casts doubt on the "single !@#$%^&*!@#$%^&*in" theory. 1999, newly declassified information showed that JFK's br!@#$%^&* casket (and body) was dumped in the Alantic in 9'000 feet of water. The casket was reported missing in since 1964 and the GSA claimed they had no idea what happened to it up till 1998. The dumping was said to be authorized by Robert Kennedy but was authorized by General Nicholas Katzenbach, the same person who was said to express concerns in an FBI memo about convincing the public that Oswald was the real !@#$%^&*!@#$%^&*in. In feb 11, 1966, Katzenbach stated in the letter ordering the dumping "I am unable to concieve of any manner in which the casket could have an evidentiary value nor can I conceive of any reason why the national interest would require its preservation". JFK was originally in a Mahoghany casket (which might have floated) but this was swapped because it was "damaged". The coffin was brand new and had only journeyed via private plane and ambulance. How did it sustain sufficient damage to require another casket? Why was the body moved from a public (Parkland hospital Dallas) hospital to a naval hospital and his autopsy performed by inexperienced military doctors under the direction of senior military officers. There are large discrepancies between the wounds found in the public hospital and the one in the military autopsy. The body left the public hospital in a sheet and arrived in a military body bag. There are strong arguments for wound alteration. Gerald R. Ford, last surviving member of Warren Commisision: "We could find no evidence of conspiracy". There is a new do-*BAD WORD*-entary that claims to reveal all on the assassination comming up on the BBC.
Guest Guest Posted November 23, 2003 Report Posted November 23, 2003 Look, the BBC doesn't know either. Nobody knows, they hid the information, and it is simply easier to just be patient and wait until it becomes public. There is one thing that really disturbes me. They had a date for release recently, but they put it back for political reasons. In the 1960s, they (whoever "they" are, I do not know) decided to release the information sometime in 1999 if I recall correctly. This time was decided because they figured that their careers would be over and they would be retired. However, when 1999 rolled around, they were still in active politics. That is what disturbes me. Whoever "they" are, they have had the same job in the US government since 1963. Not only that, but they were in senior positions at the time, meaning they had already spent a long time serving. How old are these guys? Yes age brings experience, but after a point it can create problems. First off, these guys a aloof to modern problems, especially social security, since by the standards they should be retired. Secondly, old people have a tendency to not want to cause trouble, to compromise on things that should not be compromised, to make peace when differences are irreconcilable. Bottom line, these guys should be retired and replaced. Gosh, from what this looks like age could have been a motive in the !@#$%^&*asignation.
Aileron Posted November 23, 2003 Report Posted November 23, 2003 Oh btw, that was me. stupid log in ~mumble~ ~mumble~
madhaha Posted November 23, 2003 Report Posted November 23, 2003 The makers of the do-*BAD WORD*-entary claim "new evidence" and from the trailers it appears they have used simulations extensively. Perhaps they've found a way to eliminate all other explainations leaving only 1 plausible one. OR they know how the assassination was carried out now but not by whom. I think we can easily implicate several people already who are involved in the conspiracy. Finding hard evidence is probably going to be this side of impossible though.
Aileron Posted November 25, 2003 Report Posted November 25, 2003 I don't like simulations, they really are only as good as the programmer. The only conclusion I came to was that there was more than one shooter. It could be an international conspiracy, or it could have been Oswald's hick friends. I really don't want to go into it any farther than that.
madhaha Posted November 28, 2003 Report Posted November 28, 2003 At the end of the day its old news that dead and buried (or thrown in the sea as the case may be) and he got what was comming to him.
»nintendo64 Posted November 28, 2003 Report Posted November 28, 2003 There is no doubt that JFK was the most "benevolent" (less hostile) USA President towards the Caribbean and Latin America. He even used a Dominican chair that was custom made because of his back problem, so i guess we dominicans helped shape USA in a "furniture for presidents" kind of way j/k. -nintendo64
Recommended Posts