»Blocks Posted February 11, 2008 Report Posted February 11, 2008 If we are deleting Moon Lander, we should also delete games like Bankers Deal where there is a maximum possible score.
Samapico Posted February 11, 2008 Report Posted February 11, 2008 well, moon lander gave 10k even if you just died at the beginning... so it's much worse than bankers deal.
»freakmonger Posted February 11, 2008 Report Posted February 11, 2008 well, moon lander gave 10k even if you just died at the beginning... so it's much worse than bankers deal. moon lander was either bugged or coded extremly poor. Plus you can still play for 2nd and 3rd place in bankers deal, unlike moon lander where its whoever clicked on play moon lander first got 1st/2nd/3rd....
Sound Posted February 11, 2008 Report Posted February 11, 2008 What's the use of 2nd or 3rd place? In my opinion there shouldn't be that possibility of the maximum, like bankers deal. I don't see the problem with moon lander though - nothing's wrong with a base point number of 10000 - whoever goes farthest still gets the most points.
»freakmonger Posted February 11, 2008 Report Posted February 11, 2008 uhh 2nd and 3rd place add to your total trophies rank..... And last I checked, it didn't matter if you died at the start or if you advanced, you still got 10,000 points. Which would be the reason why it was deleted, not because it had a base point system........
Samapico Posted February 11, 2008 Report Posted February 11, 2008 And last I checked, it didn't matter if you died at the start or if you advanced, you still got 10,000 points. Which would be the reason why it was deleted, not because it had a base point system........Exactly... Even if you completed the whole thing 3 times, you still get 10000 pts. Everyone who played scored exactly 10000. And games with a maximum... we could reset scores every X weeks or something. So far, only freak had 1 million in Banker's deal, so... unless several people can hit the million, I see no point in removing it.
Recommended Posts