»doc flabby Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) Report back if it runs at all! http://subspace2.net/demo.zip If it doesnt work try this one http://subspace2.net/demo_noVBO.zip run subspace2.engine.exe Controls: arrow keys = move pgup/pgdn = zoom Report back on your average FPS Edited December 30, 2007 by doc flabby Quote
CRe Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 Doesn't even run for me. It crashes right away Quote
Hakaku Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 Tested and it works for me (if all I was suppose to see was a green/red/blue/yellow cube on a purple grid, and move/spin/zoom) Average fps is 375, but either 475 or 1265 when minimized. It seems to depend on how much color is on my screen, so if I zoom in or zoom out it'll change. Quote
rootbear75 Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) runs fine... average FPS around 500-520 all it is, is a cube on a grid right? SubSpace II Init: GLFW Driver: NVIDIA Corporation Version: 2.1.1 FPS: 536 FPS: 600 FPS: 608 FPS: 638 FPS: 749 FPS: 651 FPS: 656 FPS: 540 FPS: 480 FPS: 608 FPS: 593 FPS: 623 FPS: 574 FPS: 596 FPS: 616 FPS: 588 FPS: 578 FPS: 612 FPS: 615 FPS: 609 FPS: 572 FPS: 576 FPS: 631 FPS: 590 FPS: 596 FPS: 598 FPS: 620 FPS: 639 FPS: 633 FPS: 622 FPS: 593 FPS: 612 FPS: 625 FPS: 627 FPS: 615 FPS: 612 FPS: 536 FPS: 541 FPS: 516 FPS: 394 FPS: 455 FPS: 498 FPS: 504 FPS: 512 FPS: 519 FPS: 511 FPS: 529 FPS: 540 FPS: 545 FPS: 491 FPS: 506 FPS: 516 FPS: 516 FPS: 508 FPS: 548 FPS: 510 FPS: 522 FPS: 512 FPS: 505 FPS: 517 FPS: 510 FPS: 510 FPS: 530 FPS: 506 FPS: 487 FPS: 516 FPS: 507 FPS: 519 FPS: 521 FPS: 512 FPS: 439 FPS: 438 FPS: 505 FPS: 504 FPS: 512 FPS: 508 FPS: 516 FPS: 530 FPS: 515 FPS: 503 FPS: 487 FPS: 462 FPS: 518 FPS: 507 FPS: 505 FPS: 504 FPS: 509 FPS: 515 FPS: 503 FPS: 505 FPS: 524 FPS: 508 FPS: 514 FPS: 530 FPS: 535 FPS: 538 FPS: 533 FPS: 509 FPS: 517 FPS: 518 FPS: 496 FPS: 477 FPS: 394 FPS: 501 FPS: 505 FPS: 508 FPS: 510 FPS: 504 FPS: 508 FPS: 508 FPS: 509 FPS: 499 FPS: 498 FPS: 415 FPS: 483 FPS: 508 FPS: 498 FPS: 509 FPS: 508 FPS: 512 FPS: 512 FPS: 508 FPS: 515 FPS: 520 FPS: 513 FPS: 498 FPS: 523 FPS: 514 FPS: 513 FPS: 524 FPS: 515 FPS: 588 FPS: 600 FPS: 443 FPS: 466 FPS: 499 FPS: 473 error: 1282 Closed Window Terminated. Press any key to continue . . . Edited December 30, 2007 by rootbear75 Quote
»doc flabby Posted December 30, 2007 Author Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) Tested and it works for me (if all I was suppose to see was a green/red/blue/yellow cube on a purple grid, and move/spin/zoom)Ya thats all there is to see. If it doesn't run at all. Please post the error if possible what is says in the console window, and at what point it crashes. Also post your graphics card name + model. Edited December 30, 2007 by doc flabby Quote
PoLiX Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 avg fps in the 150-200 range. Spins and moves fine. Maximize, and it crashes. Quote
Ghetto D Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 Opens the main window, then crashes. Error Message: Subspace2 has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.blah blah would you like to report this problem to microsoft. On board graphics, 16mb shared, intel Xtreme driver, not sure of the version. (crappy I know)Windows XP sp2. hope it helps some, can't wait to check it out. Quote
rootbear75 Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) Maximize, and it crashes.didnt think about that before... tried it and it worked fine for me when i maximized it... however i saw a decrease in FPS, to about half of what i stated earlier (~225fps when maxi'd) Edited December 30, 2007 by rootbear75 Quote
»CypherJF Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 The zoom in / out; move around is too quick to be useful. I have to barely touch my key before I lose track of anything. Quote
tcsoccerman Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 Same thing as creamy i believe. I get this far on the commandprompt: SubSpace IIInit: GLFWDriver: Microsoft CorporationVersion: 1.1.0 while this happens "The continuum project - pre alpha .1 opens. It turns white and gives me this error: EventType : clr20r3 P1 : subspace2.engine.exe P2 : 1.0.2919.42340 P3 : 4776d8c9 P4 : tao.opengl P5 : 2.1.0.4 P6 : 463c3cb2 P7 : 207 P8 : a P9 : system.nullreferenceexception with the usual error reporting thing looking like this: subspace2 has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. i'm windows xp dell. intel celeron. not sure how to find the graphics card information..although i know it isn't that great. Quote
rootbear75 Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 not sure how to find the graphics card information..although i know it isn't that great.Device Manager -> Display adapters or something equivalent(This is vista so im not 100% sure if xp is the exact same) Quote
»doc flabby Posted December 30, 2007 Author Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) Driver: Microsoft CorporationVersion: 1.1.0Its using the Mircosoft Opengl driver which sucks, your computer will normally have come with its own graphics driver, you might just need to update it. For those people who the demo crashed for, please try this versionhttp://subspace2.net/demo_noVBO.zip This should work for everyone as it uses no graphics extensions. The disadvantage of this is slower performance, any relatively modern card should be able to run the original demo. Edited December 30, 2007 by doc flabby Quote
tcsoccerman Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) Good news and bad News. Bad First:I don't have the cd rom for my graphics card to update with. Good News:The demo_noVBO version worked. It had an average fps of (Get ready to cry)....8. Crashed when i maxamized. Good work though. Also, if i were to get a graphics card, what would i need to run the better version and what would you suggest. Edited December 30, 2007 by tcsoccerman Also,... Quote
Cancer+ Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 Tried the first one and it worked. Average FPS is between 250-400. If I zoom out, it increases to 400-600, same with if I zoom in. Also if I maximize, it crashes. Going to test the other one too. EDIT: Tried the second one. Same thing. Crashes when I maximize. Also, what Cypher said is true. Too fast on the zooming. Quote
»doc flabby Posted December 30, 2007 Author Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) Bad First:I don't have the cd rom for my graphics card to update with. Also, if i were to get a graphics card, what would i need to run the better version and what would you suggest.Go to the manufactures website for your graphics card. They will have the driver there. The reason your performance is so bad is you are using the MS inbuilt drivers and they suck for opengl. you really have to use the manufactures drivers for any kind of performance. I think pretty much any modern card card will run the better version. Its uses openGL 1.5 (equivalent to dx8) New cards tend to support 2.0 or 2.1 which allow pixel shaders (dx9/10) Bascially the HL-2 test. If you can play Half-life 2 or an equivalent game, you should be able to run both demos. The speed of zooming/moving is directly related to your frame rate. This will obviously not be the case in a real version. Edited December 30, 2007 by doc flabby Quote
»CypherJF Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) The smaller sized numbers are full screen, avg. 638.The larger sized numbers are the normal window, avg. 1611.Combined average 1124. Card - Nvidia GeForce 7900GS 256MB SubSpace II Init: GLFW Driver: NVIDIA Corporation Version: 2.1.1 FPS: 1196 FPS: 1778 FPS: 965 FPS: 819 FPS: 653 FPS: 529 FPS: 676 FPS: 802 FPS: 685 FPS: 761 FPS: 606 FPS: 601 FPS: 614 FPS: 622 FPS: 611 FPS: 603 FPS: 625 FPS: 576 FPS: 558 FPS: 537 FPS: 522 FPS: 589 FPS: 591 FPS: 530 FPS: 609 FPS: 817 FPS: 854 FPS: 883 FPS: 719 FPS: 833 FPS: 737 FPS: 737 FPS: 571 FPS: 509 FPS: 476 FPS: 494 FPS: 529 FPS: 511 FPS: 429 FPS: 492 FPS: 573 FPS: 587 FPS: 740 FPS: 1933 FPS: 1954 FPS: 1293 FPS: 1349 FPS: 1334 FPS: 1482 FPS: 1493 FPS: 1302 FPS: 1268 FPS: 1269 FPS: 1420 FPS: 1639 FPS: 1765 FPS: 1659 FPS: 1652 FPS: 1660 FPS: 1528 FPS: 1459 FPS: 1495 FPS: 1565 FPS: 1606 FPS: 2185 FPS: 2266 FPS: 1847 FPS: 1806 FPS: 1978 FPS: 2238 FPS: 1607 FPS: 1240 FPS: 1122 FPS: 1910 FPS: 1229 error: 1282 Closed Window Terminated. Press any key to continue . . . Edited December 30, 2007 by cypherjf Quote
PoLiX Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 my fps went up by like 10, but otherwise same results when maximized. NVidia Go 7100m if I remember right. Quote
CRe Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 I get the same error as Ghetto D. I'm running Windows Vista & my graphics card is a ATI XPRESS 200M Series Quote
rootbear75 Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 tried the NoVBO one.. works fine either way..averaged around 1k when i resized the window smaller.aver 250 when maxi'dand i think 400 when regular (default) size 2250 when mini'd xD Quote
»doc flabby Posted December 30, 2007 Author Report Posted December 30, 2007 (edited) I get the same error as Ghetto D. I'm running Windows Vista & my graphics card is a ATI XPRESS 200M Serieshave you tried the noVBO version? Did that work. Also please post the Driver and version it gies before it crashes in the console window. I've looked it up and that card SHOULD support VBOs. you might need a driver update. Edited December 30, 2007 by doc flabby Quote
Samapico Posted December 30, 2007 Report Posted December 30, 2007 If it's the same thing as in your branch, it worked fine for me @ 645 FPS Quote
PoLiX Posted December 31, 2007 Report Posted December 31, 2007 SubSpace IIInit: GLFWDriver: NVIDIA CorporationVersion: 2.1.1 GeForce 7150m, 128mb dedicated, 495 shared availabe. Quote
tcsoccerman Posted December 31, 2007 Report Posted December 31, 2007 Could someone lead me to the right update website for my intel (posted above). Doc, it appears that some people are going to have problems with VBO's, so just make sure to distribute both versions. Quote
Shock Posted December 31, 2007 Report Posted December 31, 2007 (edited) Gotta download .Net Framework and then I'll post. Works, 158 FPS in full screen. Using Intel Extreme Graphics 64MB (8286G) Edited December 31, 2007 by Shock Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.